Channel

Травлю тараканов в твоей голове, личный психотерапевт. Про осознанность

@LilitLA111

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002248403043
Type	Channel
Username	@LilitLA111
Created	Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	11 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/LilitLA111

Growth

2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
11 Aug 2026, 05:46	28	no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:54	28	first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 46.4%; avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
Avg views / post: 13.0; 1 post measured
Reaction rate: 15.4%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 1; of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held	14 (24 January 2025 – 2 August 2026)
Views total	13
Reactions total	2
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	11 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos: 29
Videos: 7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime: 3m 37s
Average length: 31s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	32	59.3%
🔥	13	24.1%
👍	6	11.1%
👌	1	1.85%
👏	1	1.85%
🥰	1	1.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC13 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Video

глава «О детях» из книги «Пророк» (1923). И женщина, державшая младенца на руках, сказала: «Расскажи нам о Детях». ⠀ И он ответил: ⠀ Ваши дети — не дети вам. Они сыны и дочери тоски Жизни по самой себе. Они приходят благодаря вам, но не от вас, и, хотя они с вами, они не принадлежат вам. ⠀ Вы можете дать им вашу любовь, но не ваши мысли, ибо у них есть свои мысли. Вы можете дать пристанище их телам, но не их душам, …

❤2

Signed Lilit Психотерапевт. Ты не одна|один.

9 Jun 2026, 04:46 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Photo

Позора не существует. Серьёзно. На днях я танцевала на улице. Просто под настроение, никого не трогала, была в своём кайфе. Рядом стояла подруга и вдруг выдала: «Девочки — ну вы чего, не позорьтесь». И тут самое интересное: я не чувствовала ни капли стыда. Вообще. Мне было весело и свобдно. А вот она — чувствовала. Позор был у неё. За мои действия. За меня. Забавно, да? Получается, я делаю что-то — а стыдно почему…

❤5👍1

Signed Lilit Психотерапевт. Ты не одна|один.

27 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Photo

Успех редко приходит напрямую. Чаще к нему ведут обходные тропы — через падения, боль и неловкое «я снова ошибся». Потому что именно ошибки, а не победы, закаляют характер. Они учат нас переживать боль. А боль даёт нам пощупать наши грани, нашу выдержку, наше «дно» — чтобы оттолкнуться и пойти дальше. Ошибки — это не всё наше «я». Ошибки - это наш опыт. Они обнажают нашу неидеальность, уязвимость, несовершенство — …

🔥1

Signed Lilit Психотерапевт. Ты не одна|один.

7 Oct 2025, 09:50 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Video

Чем опасны нездоровые мотивы планирования детей? (См. Предыдущий пост) ⠀ Проблема всех этих сценариев в том, что на ребенка возлагается непосильная психологическая нагрузка. На подсознательном уровне у человека появляется родительское предписание, лживое предназначение. Он рождается с "искаженным смыслом жизни ": ⠀ · Быть клеем для отношений родителей. · Быть терапевтом от одиночества матери. · Быть смыслом жизни для…

❤1🔥1