Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Light.inc Reviews

@LightRevlews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201856181
TypeChannel
Username@LightRevlews
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LightRevlews

Growth

139140139.58 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers14 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:15139-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:30140no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:34140first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.1%
avg views ÷ 139 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 March 20261 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

чесна эмулятор прекрасен, для игрока бравшего практически 3к в мм, меня блюстаксы, данный оч понравился, настройка особенно, стабильные 180-220фпс при нищем процессоре, и на удивление точная сенса, нью рекорд в треньке поставил (107), вариации коректировки прицела в кфг тоже отличная идея, играющий всегда на 2 я в итоге поставил 808….., эмулятор топчик вообщем, мне все зашло прям сильно

26 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026

Реборн х - это самый лучший по моему мнению эмулятор из всех, что у меня были. Встроенная цветокорекция радует глаз, множество настроек для индивидуальности, очень плавная картинка и стабильный фпс на максимуме, сенса просто идеал, никакой задержки. Рекомендую, не пожалел, что приобрел данный товар!

22 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026

Мы выходим на сверхсветовую скорость, потому что слов «хороший», «отличный» и даже «потрясающий» категорически недостаточно, чтобы описать тот технологический и эмоциональный катарсис, который дарит эмулятор Light. Это не просто программное обеспечение. Это философия чистого гейминга, это манифест против лагов, фризов и всей той цифровой скверны, которая мешает нам сливаться с игрой в единое целое. Я пишу этот отзыв

19 Jun 2026, 19:53 UTC170 viewsread 8 August 2026

@Lightmanager33 спасибо ему большое установил меньше чем за 5 минут дак ещё и винду активировал благодарю

17 Jun 2026, 18:54 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята реально крутые, играл на других многих фри кастомных эму ничего не помогало, было много вылетов и фризов в том числе мало фпса (80-120), благодаря им играю с комфортом и без вылетов 180-240!!🙏🙏 Лучшие!

16 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC174 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

самый лучший эмулятор который я использовал, всем советую купить 400 фпс на ноуте, когда на других эмуляторах 180 макс. менеджер красава, со всем помог)

7 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC197 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

лучший кастомный блюстакс, спасибо менеджеру что помог мне разобраться по моей же тупости, сенса топ эмулятор сам хорош советую к покупке,а это деф -4 на легендах🫡

19 May 2026, 16:24 UTC287 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

эмулятор имба ебейшая анлок фпн вообще самая заебатая функция сама игра очень плавно ощущается так же есть много других функций по типу фриза доджа и тому подобное дизайн заебатый как по мне настроить все можно меньше чем за 3 минуты тк настроек мало что очень хорошо так же забустился фпс есть фикс сенсы за несколько сыгранных матчей ни разу не сорвало не свело и ничего подобного все очень плавно шло у мя аж глаза к

11 May 2026, 13:48 UTC277 viewsread 8 August 2026

Все супер быстро без обмана все топ

7 May 2026, 21:11 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 8 August 2026

настоящий и развернутый отзыв за +- год активного использования: эмулятор • эмулятор очень плавный, сенса приятная и без каких либо срывов. • оптимизация на данный момент пожалуй лучшая (было с чем сравнить). Картинка и фпс стабильные. • в эмуляторе очень приятная и стабильно работающая додж система, что пиздец как важно в нынешних реалиях. • фпс можно раскрыть хоть до 1к кадров и для этого не нужно что-то выдумывать

30 Apr 2026, 09:58 UTC256 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

помогли всё установить очень быстро, менеджер отвечает так же быстро и отвечает на все вопросы, цена очень вкусная за такой товар, сыграл уже несколько игр и игра действительно стала ощущаться куда лучше чем было раньше, +rep компании

19 Apr 2026, 17:22 UTC285 viewsread 8 August 2026

Все четко работает, все как мне и говорили, фпс 200-300, всем советую.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LightRevlews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 459,726 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Light.inc Reviews” (@LightRevlews), 139 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LightRevlews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.