2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
58
no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:02
58
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 58 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (7 August 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
369
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
141
Videos
43
Links
58
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👾
9
40.9%
🍓
8
36.4%
💘
2
9.09%
☃
1
4.55%
❤🔥
1
4.55%
💅
1
4.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᅠᅠ⁝ ⃨⃔𖹭⃨⃕ ⁝ 𝐆ᨵׁׅׅᨵׁׅׅ𝕕 𝕞ᨵׁׅׅ𝐫𝐧յׁׅ𝕟𝐠!!! ⵿.ೃ
⺀︬ꢶ🧊 ︬⃜𝂳Солнце медленно поднималось над горизонтом, сменяя безмолвную ночь новым рассветом и озаряя империю своими тёплыми лучами. Юный друг, проснувшись от этих нежных лучей, проникающих через окно, заметил записку на своём столе . . .𔓕ᷓ ࣪
Ж𝕖ла𝕖м вс𝕖м х◌р◌ш𝕖г◌ дня, вы ◌бязат𝕖льно см◌жете д◌стичь св◌их ц𝕖л𝕖й с𝕖г◌дня!!
ܓ𓎢͡𓎢Желаем доброе утро тем кому/кого/кто 𓈒ּꞈ𝅦⃨ۖ︵…
🧊резеф::
Оййй, я вчера забыл "спокойной ночи" пост выложить, был слишком занят заказом и кое-чем особенным для флуда.. И репост тайм в пятницу пропустил, не бейте тапками 😭
┆#Arionshp
“Во дворце объявили бал, в честь соединения двух чистых сердец...”
ᛝ ፝֟ ֖𝐍𝐄 ֖ۙ𝐖 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍!!꒱◟𝆋 ໋ ࣪ ݊ ┈
В этот радостный день
В Союз заключились два
государства.
⏝︶︵ .° ⊹ ︵ ໑ 𖹭 ᰍ ︵ ⊹ ˚. ︵︶⏝
𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐧 и 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐞
|@krdinfo229|@krdlafe228
Так пожелаем же им крепкого союза, как и честь воинов. Пусть этот союз будет долговечен!
┆#newunionArion
ᅠᅠ⁝ ⃨⃔𖹭⃨⃕ ⁝ 𝐆ᨵׁׅׅᨵׁׅׅ𝕕 𝕞ᨵׁׅׅ𝐫𝐧յׁׅ𝕟𝐠!!! ⵿.ೃ
⺀︬ꢶ🧊 ︬⃜𝂳Солнце медленно поднималось над горизонтом, сменяя безмолвную ночь новым рассветом и озаряя империю своими тёплыми лучами. Юный друг, проснувшись от этих нежных лучей, проникающих через окно, заметил записку на своём столе . . .𔓕ᷓ ࣪
Ж𝕖ла𝕖м вс𝕖м х◌р◌ш𝕖г◌ дня, вы ◌бязат𝕖льно см◌жете д◌стичь св◌их ц𝕖л𝕖й с𝕖г◌дня!!
ܓ𓎢͡𓎢Желаем доброе утро тем кому/кого/кто 𓈒ּꞈ𝅦⃨ۖ︵…
ᅠᅠ⁝ ⃨⃔𖹭⃨⃕ ⁝ 𝕊𝐰𝐞ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝐭 𝐝𝐫𝐞ɑׁׅ𝕞𝐬 !!! ⵿.ೃ
⺀︬ꢶ🧊 ︬⃜𝂳Солнце медленно скрылось за горизонтом, уступая место тихой, безвольной ночью, окутывая империю во мрак. Последние лучи растворились в сумерках, а Луна озарила небо мягким светом, с мерцающими звёздами. В эту спокойную ночь юный друг заметил на своём столе загадочную записку. . .𔓕ᷓ ࣪
Н𝕒дꫀׁׅܻ݊𝐞мся, чт◌ в𝕒м при𝕔нятся х◌𝕡◌ши𝕖 𝕔ны! !
ܓ𓎢𓎢Желаем сладких снов тем кому/ког…
𓊪𓊪ּ🧊𝐃𝕚𝐬𝐜◌𝐯𝐞𝕣𝐢݊ꪀ𝕘 𝕚𝐧𝐭ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝕣ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝕘 ◠ 𐧾
۫ 𝐭◌𝕘ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝐭𝐡ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝕣 𝕨𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝔸𝐫𝐢ᨵׁׅׅ𝐧 ֩ᰰᩬ ݄ 𝆹𖫲ۣ⃨۠ⷲ ׂ࣮ ⋮ۣۜ
⟬ 𝐅𝕒𝐜tׁׅ𝐬 ◌𝐟 tׁׅ𝐡ꫀׁׅܻ݊ 𝐃𝕒𝐲 ⟭
ㅤ𓌔 ֺ Волосатый лёд —
Иногда в лесу можно увидеть кусок дерева, покрытый тончайшими белыми "волосами". На самом деле это лёд. Он образуется благодаря особому грибку, который влияет на процесс замерзания воды внутри древесины. В результате …
“Во дворце объявили бал, в честь соединения двух чистых сердец...”
ᛝ ፝֟ ֖𝐍𝐄 ֖ۙ𝐖 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍!!꒱◟𝆋 ໋ ࣪ ݊ ┈
В этот радостный день
В Союз заключились два
государства.
⏝︶︵ .° ⊹ ︵ ໑ 𖹭 ᰍ ︵ ⊹ ˚. ︵︶⏝
𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐧 и 𝕊𝕚𝕝𝕖𝕟𝕥 𝔽𝕝𝕠𝕠𝕕
| @silentf_lood | @podsluhanoflood
Так пожелаем же им крепкого союза, как и честь воинов. Пусть этот союз будет долговечен!
┆#newunionArion
“Во дворце объявили бал, в честь соединения двух чистых сердец...”
ᛝ ፝֟ ֖𝐍𝐄 ֖ۙ𝐖 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍!!꒱◟𝆋 ໋ ࣪ ݊ ┈
В этот радостный день
В Союз заключились два
государства.
⏝︶︵ .° ⊹ ︵ ໑ 𖹭 ᰍ ︵ ⊹ ˚. ︵︶⏝
𝐀𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐧 и 𝑯𝑬𝑨𝑹𝑻 𝑫𝑬𝑷𝑻𝑯𝑺
| @heartdepths | @lifeheartdepths
Так пожелаем же им крепкого союза, как и честь воинов. Пусть этот союз будет долговечен!
┆#newunionArion
ᅠᅠ⁝ ⃨⃔𖹭⃨⃕ ⁝ 𝐆ᨵׁׅׅᨵׁׅׅ𝕕 𝕞ᨵׁׅׅ𝐫𝐧յׁׅ𝕟𝐠!!! ⵿.ೃ
⺀︬ꢶ🧊 ︬⃜𝂳Солнце медленно поднималось над горизонтом, сменяя безмолвную ночь новым рассветом и озаряя империю своими тёплыми лучами. Юный друг, проснувшись от этих нежных лучей, проникающих через окно, заметил записку на своём столе . . .𔓕ᷓ ࣪
Ж𝕖ла𝕖м вс𝕖м х◌р◌ш𝕖г◌ дня, вы ◌бязат𝕖льно см◌жете д◌стичь св◌их ц𝕖л𝕖й с𝕖г◌дня!!
ܓ𓎢͡𓎢Желаем доброе утро тем кому/кого/кто 𓈒ּꞈ𝅦⃨ۖ︵…
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Life_Arion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 184,510 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“۶⬚ ᩫᰰ⵿۶𝒜𝐫𝐢ᨵׁׅׅ𝐧𝒢 ׅ᪲” (@Life_Arion), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Life_Arion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.