💫 🗒 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐍 🗒 1. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 2. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 3. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 4. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 5. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 6. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 7. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 8. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 9. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 10. 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 1. 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 2. 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐃𝐄𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍

Channel
𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭
@Lelouchunion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003956250816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lelouchunion |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 19 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lelouchunion |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 703.3%
- avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 56.3
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,069 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 14
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лист 10
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лист 9
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лист 8
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лист 7
Sticker, posted without a caption
Лист 6
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lelouchunion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,147,560 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Aetherix_inf · 1041 post#𝗔𝗧𝗞 | 𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘
@aetherix_life · 1011 post𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙤/𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘
@BLADEROMANCEINFO · 231 post#𝗕𝗟 || 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢
@bli_info · 431 post#𝗕𝗟 || 𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘
@bli_life · 371 post‹~𝔅𝔯𝔦𝔤𝔥𝔱 𝔓𝔞𝔱𝔥~› ⁱⁿᶠᵒ
@Brightpath105 · 971 post𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝕽𝖆𝖞ᴸᶦᶠᵉ
@CARayLife · 1181 postミ 𝖢𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗅𝗎𝖾ᶦᶰᶠᵒ ミ #𝑪𝑩
@celestialblue_info · 611 postミ 𝖢𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗅𝗎𝖾ᶫᶦᶠᵉ ミ #𝑪𝑩
@celestialblue_life · 641 post[🖥] ─ #𝑫𝑰𝑮𝑰𝑻𝑨𝑳 𝑨𝑭𝑻𝑬𝑹𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬# │ 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹
@DigitalAfterlife_life · 1361 post𑀉ifᥱ | 𑀥i᥎iᥒᥱ 𐌺ᥲⲙᥙi
@divine_kamui_life · 131 post[ 𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘 ] – ⊹₊˚𝗘𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 (✿゙):;
@ETW_lifCH · 381 post𓂃𝗞𝗣 | 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 .·
@KP_infoo · 1281 post_𝗞𝗣 | 𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘 .·
@KP_lifee · 1231 post𝐵𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑝𝑎𝑡ℎ 𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑓
@laifBp · 871 post𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚/𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗘
@life_BLADE_ROMANCE · 181 post𓈒𖥻 ۪ ׁ🍋🟩 .۫𝖫𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 ִ𝖲𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗉𝖾 ׁ𝂅ׄ෪𓈒֕ˡⁱᶠᵉ
@lightstripelife · 1421 post𓈒ִ ꯭ׄ ➤ 𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾 ⸝⸝ 𝔐‼︎𝗡𝔍𝗬𝔇𝗜𝖤 ִֹ .
@mintydieLIFE · 751 post𝜗𝒞 ~ ʍᴏᴏnlighᴛ wisᴛᴇriᴀ infᴏ
@Moonlight_wisteria_info · 691 postlifᴇ
@moonlightwisteria1life · 421 post𝑷𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝑺𝒖𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒕ৎ - info
@pink_sunsetinfo · 231 post𝑷𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝑺𝒖𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒕ৎ - life
@pink_sunsetlife · 171 post[ЗАКРЫТЫ] ☾⋆ 𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚 | 𝙎𝙞𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝘼𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙥𝙨𝙮 ⋆☾
@SilentAutopsylife · 151 post𝖸𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈
@yasashhisa · 1341 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭” (@Lelouchunion), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lelouchunion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.