Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luxemburg-Liebknecht-Demo

Channel

Luxemburg-Liebknecht-Demo

@Liebknecht_Demo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

175subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740264077
TypeChannel
Username@Liebknecht_Demo
DescriptionDie Partei der Linken hat ihre einstigen Ideale längst verraten. Nicht genug, dass sie zum Steigbügelhalter der NATO-Doktrin geworden ist, möchte sie Menschen zu Impfungen per Impfzwang zwingen. Liebknecht und auch Luxemburg würden dem nie zustimmen
Created22 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Liebknecht_Demo

Growth

1756 August 2026 — 175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 175 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:01175no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:54175first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
159
Videos
202
Links
260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
49m 44s
Average length
7m 06s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1794.4%
15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2022 to 28 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Mar 2023, 17:09 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

22 Mar 2023, 01:38 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

10 Mar 2023, 10:32 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

28 Mar 2022, 07:50 UTC≈2,070 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WirSindViele_DemoPhoto

Auch kommenden Montag werden wir wieder durch die Straßen von Pankow ziehen! Denkt daran, der Spaziergang ist angemeldet, wir können uns zeigen und laut sein, also bringt gerne Schilder, Megaphone, Trommeln etc. mit! An der Gethsemanekirche wird es dann bis ca. 21Uhr noch einen kleine Kundgebung mit einigen Reden und live Musik von der Basis Band geben🎺🥁!

👍3

21 Mar 2022, 12:05 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @freedomparadekanalVideo

Der Gerichtstermin vom Di. den 22.03.22 wird wohl verschoben❗️❗️❗️ Ein anderer Termin bezüglich meiner Feststellungsklage, das meine Teilnahmeuntersagung wegen einer angeblichen Corona-Infektion am 25.09.21 rechtswidrig war, fand heute statt...

21 Mar 2022, 03:57 UTC≈1,600 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Die ukrainischen Faschisten vergewaltigen Frauen & junge Mädchen, sie töten schwangere Frauen empfinden noch Spaß dabei. In der Zwischenzeit sammeln in Frankfurt am Main ganz offiziell Gemeinden für die faschistischen Bataillone Geld, um diese noch besser mit Waffen auszurüsten. Deutschland sieht zu & beschuldigt weiterhin Russland. http://www.hr-online.de/.../nachr.../indexhessen34938.jsp... Das ist der Terror de

👍31

21 Mar 2022, 02:36 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️NAZIS raus aus unseren Demos‼️ Wir kämpfen für Menschen & für Menschlichkeit, nicht für Nazis, Dulden wir sie in unseren Demos, dann legitimieren wir Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit & werden zu ihren Steigbügelhaltern für neue Verbrechen gegen Menschen. Die Ukraine hat uns gezeigt wie Nazis ein ganzes Land verwüsten und Berge von Leichen hinterlassen. Seht euch Odessa an vom 2. Mai 2014 und vergesst nicht die

20 Mar 2022, 23:38 UTC573 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WirSindViele_DemoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

17 Mar 2022, 13:29 UTC765 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @freedomparadekanalPhoto

Freitag ist Captain Future bei dem Umzug ab 9 Uhr Unter den Linden und ab 11:30 Uhr auf der Bühne am Potsdamer Platz. Gleichzeitig unterstützen wir die Peace Parade 2.0 mit Technik, welche um 10 Uhr ab Ernst-Reuter-Platz startet und ggf. keine Maskenpflicht durchsetzt.

👍1

16 Mar 2022, 13:59 UTC≈6,700 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Klarstellung: Samstag Demo von "Friedlich zusammen" - Nazis in der Demo‼️ Zeugenaussage: "Als ich mit der U-Bahn an der Eberswalder ankam, bemerkte ich schon in der Bahn Aufruhr. Stieg normal aus, ging Richtung Mauerpark, wechselte auf die linke Straßenseite & lief zügig weiter, da ich mir ein Bier & Zigaretten in dem Spätkauf vor dem Kindergarten kaufen wollte. Dann kam ich heraus & wollte meinen Augen nicht trau

👍2

12 Mar 2022, 03:35 UTC795 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DemokratischerWiderstandTelegramPoll

UMFRAGE Haben Sie den Eindruck, dass Sie durch Einschalten des TV-Gerätes oder durch Aufrufen der großen Nachrichten-Apps wie Tagesschau an wahrheitsgemäße Informationen gelangen?

  1. Ja, im Großen und Ganzen sind die Nachrichten wahrheitsgemäß und zuverlässig.2%
  2. Nein, in wichtigen Ressorts gibt es keinerlei Zuverlässigkeit. Es wird absichtlich und viel gelogen.90%
  3. 50-50. Bei manchen Themen wird absichtlich gelogen, bei anderen ist die Information redlich.7%
  4. Weiß nicht / mag die Frage nicht.1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

12 Mar 2022, 03:15 UTC887 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

‼️ Российское видео подтверждает анализ о войне, проведенный страницей Аноним‼️ 19.02.2022 года о развертывании российских войск в Украине уже сообщала страница Аноним. Страница занимается военно-стратегическим анализом с 2013 года, предсказывает перевороты, войны и военные операции, которые также произошли в точности с результатом. В течение многих лет отмечалось, что Россия должна реагировать по соображениям нац

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Liebknecht_Demo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Mar 2022, 03:35 UTCAnonymous Poll3,840 voters approx.

UMFRAGE Haben Sie den Eindruck, dass Sie durch Einschalten des TV-Gerätes oder durch Aufrufen der großen Nachrichten-Apps wie Tagesschau an wahrheitsgemäße Informationen gelangen?

  1. Ja, im Großen und Ganzen sind die Nachrichten wahrheitsgemäß und zuverlässig.2%
  2. Nein, in wichtigen Ressorts gibt es keinerlei Zuverlässigkeit. Es wird absichtlich und viel gelogen.90%
  3. 50-50. Bei manchen Themen wird absichtlich gelogen, bei anderen ist die Information redlich.7%
  4. Weiß nicht / mag die Frage nicht.1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2022 to 28 March 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 351,126 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luxemburg-Liebknecht-Demo” (@Liebknecht_Demo), 175 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liebknecht_Demo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.