Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐋𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞ʷⁱˣⁱˢ | 𝟏𝟖+

@Lidocainu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

385subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002440929049
TypeChannel
Username@Lidocainu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lidocainu

Growth

385386385.512 Aug 2026, 09:01 — 386 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:06 — 385 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:0112 Aug 2026, 20:06
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 385–386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:06385-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:01386first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.6%
avg views ÷ 385 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held13 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,133
Reactions total340
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

340 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537081419084598753113940.9%
custom 53731117449462775108123.8%
custom 53527343112650909953410.0%
custom 5334641628386730693329.41%
custom 5832389292445407059298.53%
custom 5334514458700062747257.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lidocainu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC90 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Бляяя мне так сильно нравится этот арт до сих пор

custom 537311174494627751012

10 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC130 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dsplzPhoto

СЕГОДНЯ МОЙ ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ! мне исполняется 16 лет. спасибо всем, кто поддерживал меня в этом году! буду рада репостам и реакциям, а также комментариям. можете писать в анонку. моя карта, если кто то хочт что-то подарить (тбанк) 2200700535311699

custom 53527343112650909959custom 53731117449462775102custom 53708141908459875311

9 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC166 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @EngelOverdrivePhoto

Трейд с лидооо😍😍😍😍😍 черт она так круто рисует https://t.me/Lidocainu

custom 537311174494627751012custom 58323892924454070594

9 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC182 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Трейдиксьц с моей новой девушкой 🛋

custom 537311174494627751026custom 53527343112650909958custom 53708141908459875315

8 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC193 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В конфе скинули пикчу решила скетчик сделать

custom 533451445870006274725custom 537081419084598753111custom 58323892924454070598custom 53731117449462775104

4 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC313 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @scarling4Photo

Гифт второц маме на др 🤗🤗🩷 #gift

custom 537081419084598753118custom 53731117449462775109custom 58323892924454070597custom 53527343112650909954

3 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC280 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @extaridrobbPhoto

ненавижу его ямато

custom 537081419084598753117custom 53731117449462775101

2 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC322 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Посидели с мамою папою и женою отметили, заказали мне ёбырей, вот они справа от меня стоят🌟

custom 533464162838673069321custom 53708141908459875318custom 53731117449462775102

2 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC278 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

С днём рождения, Лида!^^ Желаю тебе всего наилучшего, ты самая-самая! И я желаю тебе всегда оставаться такой, то есть, собой :)

custom 537081419084598753116custom 53346416283867306935custom 53731117449462775101

1 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC271 views30 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо большое за поздравления, ребята, я не смогу отблагодарить вас всех лично, но всем я благодарна. Это правда приятно, приятно получать столько добрих слов, спасибо что вы есть.

custom 537081419084598753119custom 53731117449462775107custom 53346416283867306934

1 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC283 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ура, с днём рождения меня

custom 537081419084598753126custom 583238929244540705910custom 53731117449462775105

1 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC305 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну все меня официально могут трахать мужики 30+

custom 537081419084598753118

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Lidocainu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 432,400 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐋𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞ʷⁱˣⁱˢ | 𝟏𝟖+” (@Lidocainu), 385 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lidocainu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.