А мне кажется, что взрослых тоже иногда нужно воспитывать😈🤣
😱2💯1🔥1🙈1

Channel
@Leshiy_uncensored
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
80subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003794743411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Leshiy_uncensored |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Leshiy_uncensored |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 80 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
223 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 59 | 26.5% | |
| 🤣 | 44 | 19.7% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 13.0% | |
| 😈 | 20 | 8.97% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 7.62% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.17% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 4.93% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 4.48% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 4.04% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.448% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А мне кажется, что взрослых тоже иногда нужно воспитывать😈🤣
😱2💯1🔥1🙈1
Сидели тут с Алёнкой, изучали сайт одного из образовательных заведений для наших детей... Очень много информации о том какие они классные, подготовка... ну просто Гарвард нервно курит в сторонке, большой выбор образовательных направлений... И вот мне вспомнилась песня Высоцкого «Я не люблю». И вот Владимир Семёныч пел, что он не любит, а меня, блядь, при всём моём умиротворении, дико раздражает, когда нет актуальны…
💯10😁2👏1😈1
Вот почему холодильник прямоугольный, а всё что мы пытаемся туда запихать - круглое?! Тарелки... кастрюли... и даже арбузик туда же😈 Но ничего, арбузик подровняем🤣
🔥3😁2❤1
Вот готовишь ты каждый день изыски всякие, а тут взял и испёк слоек с картошкой и печЁнкой... Сидишь, жуёшь, и аж глаза от удовольствия подкатываешь😈🤣 Пост без глубокой мысли, просто поделиться хотелось😉
😁8👍5👏3
Суровые ежи у нас живут😈
❤4😱3😁1😈1
Я конечно понимаю, что значение далеко от рекордов и т.д. Но я сегодня просто немного перемещался по двору🤣
👍4😁2😈2
Сейчас смотрел очередной кулинарный видос, в котором повар готовил в перчатках... И подумалось мне: как же хорошо, что я не стал профессиональным поваром (по образованию)... Ведь это же бездушно разделывать рыбу в перчатках, не чувствуя всю её фактуру... Вот такой вот я кинестетик😁 Подумал про массаж в перчатках, аж противно стало🤣😈
❤5💯4😍1
Поржали с Алёнкой, и решили, что это самый безобидный семейный срач😈🤣🤣
😁6👏2💯1
А руки-то в общем золотые, но вот уж этот палец всю картину портит🤣
💯5😁2
Вчера не зря выложил ролик... Сегодня в течении одного часа, в один и тот же палец, сначала закрутил саморез, а потом порезал его же ножом🤣😈 А три года назад этот же палец дважды сломал за пару месяцев🤣🤣
😈4😱4🙉1🙊1
До слёз 🤣🤣 Прям моя школа😈 Я так раз кувалдой промахнулся... но на бобра похож не стал🤣🤣
🤣10😱2😈1
Фотку нашёл... 2005 год, универ, лавочка. Леший. Начало😈
🔥10😁3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Leshiy_uncensored. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔞Леший БЕЗ Цензуры🔞” (@Leshiy_uncensored), 80 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Leshiy_uncensored.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.