Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Châtaine🫀

@Lerthikk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

844subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002421752389
TypeChannel
Username@Lerthikk
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lerthikk

Growth

8448 Aug 2026, 11:05 — 844 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:54 — 844 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:059 Aug 2026, 07:54
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 843–845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:54844no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:05844first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.7%
avg views ÷ 844 subscribers
Avg views / post
917
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held17 (14 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total12,841
Reactions total710
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

883 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541381348356314384917419.7%
custom 544752709134609917914416.3%
💅9811.1%
😈9010.2%
custom 5447120654295913139819.17%
🌚798.95%
🦄718.04%
custom 5447204728280732100475.32%
custom 5402185546803979943333.74%
custom 5235551995519061315202.27%
custom 5373092640931734187151.70%
custom 5312298418238930271111.25%
custom 529897177896453798680.906%
custom 541371947102400207880.906%
custom 541119574824086703340.453%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 883reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lerthikk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC579 views59 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌾МОЯ КЕНТ 🤣 🌾МОЯ РЕШАЛА 🤣 🌾МОЯ ОПОРА 🤣 🌾МОЯ СМЕШИНКА 🤣

custom 544712065429591313927custom 523555199551906131516custom 540218554680397994311custom 52989717789645379862custom 53122984182389302712custom 53730926409317341871

2 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC586 views59 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

А так ПРАВА НА ЖИЗНЬ ИМЕЮТСЯ

custom 544712065429591313930custom 537309264093173418714custom 54137194710240020788custom 54472047282807321005custom 52989717789645379861custom 53122984182389302711

30 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC825 views95 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 544720472828073210042custom 544712065429591313924custom 540218554680397994322custom 53122984182389302714custom 52355519955190613152custom 52989717789645379861

28 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC879 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😇😇😇

custom 54475270913460991797custom 52989717789645379864custom 53122984182389302714custom 52355519955190613152

28 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC848 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/Lerthikk

💅9custom 54111957482408670334

27 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC831 views54 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😈25🦄13💅12custom 54475270913460991794

24 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,060 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😇😇😇 ЛЮБИМКИ

custom 541381348356314384914custom 54475270913460991795

24 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC957 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cadetswoman18Video

🫰

custom 541381348356314384927custom 54475270913460991797🦄5

19 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,230 views107 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Самый красивый

🌚56custom 544752709134609917925custom 541381348356314384921🦄3💅2

16 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,310 views84 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bypryanyaVideo

Боролись, алычу собирали, футбол смотрели, ящериц ловили, аистов видели, в Будапеште были Венгрия - done ✅

custom 544752709134609917940custom 541381348356314384921💅19🦄4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Lerthikk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 719,132 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Châtaine🫀” (@Lerthikk), 844 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lerthikk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.