Channel
@LeonSwiftstorm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002059592274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LeonSwiftstorm |
| Description | My channel just to put some art and doodles.⭐️ https://linktr.ee/leonswiftstorm |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LeonSwiftstorm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 19 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 February 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 239 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
104 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 94.2% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.962% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Attack I did for my love @/leonswiftstorm.bsky.social Featuring his OC Gareth 💕. This cute kitty-cat deserves so much more loving!! 💚🐱 Also peep that nice outfit he's wearing, have I told you guys that I love designing clothes for characters? 💕
❤2
Ninth attack of this year! A last minute attack, I simply had to revenge this one! x3 Snowflake has a very nice design and I like characters with simple color palettes. I'm happy I was able to finish this one just in time ^^ For Uncanny-illustrator @ Art Fight, DA, FA
❤4
Eighth attack of this year! It's been a while since I drew Tyller, so for this year I decided to remake an old drawing I made back in 2019 (original one in the comments), this character has always been one of my favorites so it was fun to draw him again! For @AerialSupernova
❤6
Seventh attack of this year! I choose to draw Katy since she has a very lovely design! She looks a bit puzzled because there is something unusual in her social media numbers (in reality, is just that she has 1 follower less than yesterday). For CoolCSD1986 @ Art Fight, Twitter/X, FurAffinity
❤5❤🔥1
Sixth attack of this year! Bats are very interesting to draw and the moment I saw this character I knew I had to draw her! ^^ For selomon @ Art Fight, Bsky, FA
❤5
Fifth attack of this year! I've wanted to draw one of the characters from this artist for a while and I thought Carlos was a nice fit, he has a very nice design! ^^ For LigPanda @ ArtFight, pandalig @ Bsky, @ligfriendshipgroup
❤4🥰1
Fourth attack of this year! This character has been one of my favorite ones to draw, she has a very interesting design, also looks like she would have a nice personality so I hope I nailed it ^^ For Kottarooi @ Art Fight, Bsky, CooperTheHusky0 @ X/Twitter
❤7🥰1
Third attack of this year! It's the turn of Joel, I really liked her design so I had to try drawing her in my style :3 For icedcofi @ ArtFight
❤5
Second attack of this year, and first friendly fire! I owed a raffle prize to Ketsui, so I decided to include it as an AF attack. I choose to draw Klowngaroo since he is so cute and so much fun to draw! ^^ For ketsuibun @ Bsky, Twitter/X, FA Ketsui @ ArtFight
❤5
First attack of this year! It's Nick Caster, I've known the artist for a while but never had the chance to draw something for him, well this was the perfect excuse, this was fun to draw! ^^ For NickArtistFox00 @ ArtFight, Bsky, FA
❤3
I wanted to give a try to this idea. And I happen to have two dogs with floppy ears who I can use. Have an anxious Bonnie and an anxious Hazel.
❤6
Deltarune is trending so I'm reposting some Ralsei fanart from 2021 which I still like a lot, back when the second chapter was released. I really need to catch up with the game 😅
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LeonSwiftstorm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 10,810 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LeonSwiftstorm” (@LeonSwiftstorm), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeonSwiftstorm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.