Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✨19 кругов ада ✨LEM19

@Lem_19MM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,378subscribers

+142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001859520091
TypeChannel
Username@Lem_19MM
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lem_19MM

Growth

13,23613,37813,3076 August 2026 — 13,236 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,257 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,261 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,329 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,367 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,376 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,378 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,215–13,399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:3613,378+2
12 Aug 2026, 01:1313,376+9
10 Aug 2026, 23:1713,367+38
9 Aug 2026, 21:1413,329+69
8 Aug 2026, 23:5613,260-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:1513,261+4
6 Aug 2026, 23:4013,257+21
6 Aug 2026, 07:0413,236first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 13,378 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,230
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held83 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total255,090
Reactions total28,734
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26,896 reactions across 73 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8,91133.1%
❤‍🔥5,17719.2%
🍓3,36612.5%
🥰3,06111.4%
💘1,7016.32%
🎄9363.48%
🤯5392.00%
🐳5281.96%
👍4941.84%
💊3931.46%
💋3871.44%
🦄2530.941%
👾2480.922%
💅2300.855%
🤝2040.758%
👏900.335%
😁800.297%
🤣570.212%
🤩520.193%
🍌260.097%
19 further kinds1630.606%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,734reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 79 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
56
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lem_19MM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,350 views365 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✨!!!КОММИШКИ!!! ✨ Решила поделиться ещё одним крутым коммишком! Арт для : https://t.me/kollihibffwrite Рисовать различные АУ так круто! ☺️🍺 #скайзернAU

❤‍🔥266🔥58😭22🍓9🥰4👾3💊1💋1

12 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈2,030 views143 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вот тг канал если у вас нет тт ❤️❤️

💅106🔥22❤‍🔥9🍓4🎄1💊1

12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,120 views127 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4KUM7pT/ Я прям очень и очень обожаю озвучку этого канала!!💓💓💓

🔥109🎄7💅6❤‍🔥2🍓2💊1

12 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,630 views396 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ура, отсылка

🔥324❤‍🔥41💘18💅4💊3🦄2🍓1🍾1

12 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,870 views163 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @EchoStudioVIVideo

— Эпизод 3: Семья. ———————≈=≈——————— Автор комикса — Тык Lololoshka fandom Озвучено: Джон — Гавейн Саша — Руна Эдвард — Эпик Мари — Полина 3-? (2 часть —> Тык) Наш TikTok —> Тык Наш YouTube —> Тык Мы — Студия Эхо! ———————≈=≈——————— #озвучка #лофд #Вместе #Джон #Саша #Эдвард #Мари

🥰137❤‍🔥13🔥5🎄3🦄2👀1👏1👾1

11 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC≈3,230 views413 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Что за книжки Люц опять начитался 🙄🙄🙄

🔥327🍓42❤‍🔥32👍8🎄1💘1🥰1🦄1

11 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC≈3,250 views820 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Лололюц ждали? Я да. Точно ли это сонный паралич?

🔥609🥰94😁50❤‍🔥31🍓14💋7💊6💘3

11 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC≈3,290 views204 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Съем 😋😫😫😫😫😫

❤‍🔥171🥰16🔥13💊2🎄1🦄1

11 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC≈5,070 views403 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

АВВВВ!!!, Ниша спасибо за подарочек!! Хехе Вот мы КРУТЫШКИ в скетче💓💓💓💓🍺🍺🫢🫢

💘294❤‍🔥62👍28🥰7🔥4🍓3💊3🎄1

11 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈2,670 views421 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @faky0u1Photo

Подарочек для Лем19🌟 Яппиии

🔥309❤‍🔥47🥰40🍓11👏3👾3🎄2💊2

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,320 views246 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Да, я плоха в теориях пхахахахах по этому не судите строго

🍓200🔥21🥰14💊6❤‍🔥2🎄1💘1🦄1

11 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,440 views318 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Возможно это теория уже для всех очевидно или что-то я не понимаю... Но хочу спросить Я думаю что Элия помогательный нпс для Иветт Блин пхпхп Рома возможно прав что она нпс. Почему же не Иветт нпс, ведь на ней использовали устройства тайного знания и ей было видно её прошлое.

🦄239🤯35🔥27❤‍🔥9🍓3💘2🎄1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Lem_19MM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTCAnonymous Poll662 voters

Сделать ли Эбардо из Ау За маской цундеркой ?

  1. Да67%
  2. Да65%
  3. Да68%
  4. Да66%

The shares total 266%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,187 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨19 кругов ада ✨LEM19” (@Lem_19MM), 13,378 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lem_19MM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.