бюджета не хватило #скетч #Sanhez
custom 53146126110425468588custom 53597124949547513986custom 53123243426615557163

Channel
@Lebed993
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
332subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101572385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lebed993 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lebed993 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 332 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 332 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,997 |
| Reactions total | 726 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,278 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312324342661555716 | 309 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5314612611042546858 | 247 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5359712494954751398 | 227 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5312555751204489834 | 154 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5260595030699041182 | 138 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5312439250216583677 | 83 | 6.49% | |
| custom 5215290684868684485 | 31 | 2.43% | |
| custom 5197433787104902262 | 30 | 2.35% | |
| custom 5253782791660785562 | 24 | 1.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.548% | |
| custom 5442895166685859539 | 5 | 0.391% | |
| custom 5312225481104330351 | 4 | 0.313% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.235% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.156% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lebed993. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
бюджета не хватило #скетч #Sanhez
custom 53146126110425468588custom 53597124949547513986custom 53123243426615557163
#коммишен
custom 531232434266155571627custom 53597124949547513989custom 53146126110425468586
жалкие попытки рисования на планшете хотел попробовать полноценку, в итоге все отъебнулось sad, будет скетч скорее всего еще и качество не очень будет,. #скетч #Sanhez
custom 531232434266155571640custom 53146126110425468589custom 53597124949547513989
в главных ролях.. конченный идиот самый сексуальный мужик в мире #скетч #Sanhez #Gl1st
custom 531232434266155571648custom 531461261104254685819custom 535971249495475139817
#скетч #Sanhez
custom 535971249495475139844custom 531461261104254685821custom 531232434266155571617
#скетч #Sanhez
custom 531232434266155571665custom 531461261104254685824custom 535971249495475139815
ходят слухи, что Сгуди рисует шесть персонажей с 9 сентября 25 года
custom 535971249495475139828custom 53123243426615557169custom 53146126110425468587
☝️✌️🤏🫳🖐🤙🤲 #скетч #мш #Sanhez #Just_S #SecB #PWGoood
custom 531461261104254685848custom 535971249495475139819custom 531232434266155571618
о бля #скетч #флуд
custom 531232434266155571649custom 535971249495475139817custom 531461261104254685815
#коммишен
custom 535971249495475139839custom 531461261104254685814custom 531232434266155571611
#коммишен
custom 531461261104254685842custom 535971249495475139813custom 531232434266155571610
извинитесь, резкие изменения.
custom 531461261104254685834custom 531232434266155571612custom 535971249495475139811
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lebed993. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 135,159 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“๋๋⊹ ࣪ ˖ 𝐒𝐠𝐨𝐝𝐲•𝐋𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐝! ˖ ࣪ ⊹” (@Lebed993), 332 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lebed993.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.