тики тики тики тики
custom 52426588650188499552

Channel
@LeawTirey
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
99subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003899522204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LeawTirey |
| Description | Начало — 19.03.26. Бот для вступления — @LeawTireyBot Наш тик-ток — https://www.tiktok.com/@leawtireyy?_r=1&_t=ZS-953DCCm1zwF |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 19 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LeawTirey |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 99 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 99 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
244 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404721759352036608 | 37 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5199777116966656333 | 33 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5242658865018849955 | 33 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5325894330487960938 | 20 | 8.20% | |
| custom 5346237387250885911 | 20 | 8.20% | |
| custom 5242598787016315142 | 19 | 7.79% | |
| custom 5323349923142324009 | 16 | 6.56% | |
| custom 5987561577472072718 | 16 | 6.56% | |
| custom 5987737164325068387 | 16 | 6.56% | |
| custom 5990291591829396459 | 14 | 5.74% | |
| custom 5208546795939970711 | 11 | 4.51% | |
| custom 5307605127085981676 | 8 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5307747625510926792 | 1 | 0.41% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
тики тики тики тики
custom 52426588650188499552
Со всеми союзами разрыв. Патент за нами 🤩
🌞 | Как вы могли заметить, наш проект уже долгое время не выходил на связь и находился в состоянии реста. Несмотря на то, что мы обещали эпичное возвращение, сегодня вынуждены сообщить совсем другие новости. Мы приняли решение завершить ведение «Le’aw Tirey». Этот проект подарил нам множество теплых воспоминаний, познакомил с замечательными людьми, позволил приобрести новый опыт и пройти путь, который навсегда остан…
custom 524265886501884995513custom 54047217593520366089custom 59875615774720727186custom 52085467959399707112custom 52425987870163151422custom 53233499231423240091custom 59877371643250683871
🌞 | Набор в проект «Le’aw Tìrey» вновь открыт! Для вступления — @LeawTireyBot 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 @LeawTirey ✔️
custom 54047217593520366089custom 51997771169666563336custom 59902915918293964595custom 59875615774720727183custom 52425987870163151422custom 52426588650188499552custom 53233499231423240091custom 53258943304879609381
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🥹 Наш лайф-канал :: @LeawTireyLife
custom 51997771169666563335custom 53258943304879609385custom 52085467959399707112custom 53233499231423240092custom 53462373872508859112custom 59877371643250683872custom 54047217593520366081
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
File, posted without a caption
custom 51997771169666563334custom 59877371643250683874custom 53233499231423240093custom 52085467959399707112custom 53258943304879609382custom 53462373872508859112
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🤩🤩🔤𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 ¡ ও 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 ⭐🤩🥂🤩Администрация ролевого проекта под названием «Le’aw Tìrey» приветствует всех, просматривающих данный пост! Мы заявляем патент на всё, касающееся нашего проекта : название, концепцию и оформление как текстовое, так и организационное. С этой знаменательной для нас даты — [ 19.03.2026 ] — выше перечисленное закрепляется за нашим владением. Категорически запрещается нарушать патент, вследстви…
custom 53076051270859816765custom 53462373872508859115custom 54047217593520366084custom 52085467959399707112custom 52425987870163151422custom 52426588650188499552custom 59875615774720727182custom 59877371643250683872
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🤩🤩🤩🔤𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 🥹 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 🤩🤩🥹🌟 🥹 🔤🔤𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘺𝘢 🔤 🔤𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘳 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 🔤@helllIen🔤 🥹🥹🔤🌟🥹 🔤🔤𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨 🔤 🔤𝘸𝘯𝘦𝘳 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 🔤𝘯𝘰 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦🔤 🤩🤩🤩🌟🤩 🔤🔤𝘦𝘺𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘪 🔤 🔤𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 🔤𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯🔀🔀⭐ 🔤@scvddl 🔤 🤩🤩🤩🤩🔤🔤-𝘋𝘰𝘨🔤 🔤𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 🔤𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯 💙💙 🔤@mtsuur 🔤 🪧🪽🤩🔤🔤 🔤𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 🔤𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯 💙💙💙 🔤🔤 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 — За вступлением обращаться в бота, закрепленного в навигационном посте ( @LeawTireyBot ), большая просьба не писать администрации по этому поводу. — Набор в администрац
custom 51997771169666563335custom 53258943304879609384custom 59902915918293964594custom 52425987870163151422custom 53233499231423240092custom 53462373872508859112custom 54047217593520366082custom 52426588650188499551
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LeawTirey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 739,857 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LeawTirey named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“закрыто|𝘓𝘦’𝘢𝘸 𝘛𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘺” (@LeawTirey), 99 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeawTirey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.