4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 605–608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 06:19
605
-3
29 Aug 2026, 08:34
608
+2
21 Aug 2026, 12:06
606
no change
21 Aug 2026, 11:15
606
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 605 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
20 (18 May 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
110
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
115
78.8%
🔥
20
13.7%
🍓
4
2.74%
👍
4
2.74%
☃
2
1.37%
😭
1
0.685%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
역량을 발휘하다 إظهار/إبراز القدرات والإمكانيات
예:
-소셜 미디어는 개인의 창의적인 역량을 발휘하기 좋은 공간이다.
تُعد وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي مساحة ممتازة لإبراز الإمكانيات الإبداعية للفرد.
-꾸준한 연습을 통해 실전에서 제 역량을 제대로 발휘하고 싶습니다.
أرغب في إظهار قدراتي بالشكل المطلوب في الميدان العملي من خلال التدريب المستمر.
-----------
#지알
일석이조 ضرب عصفورين بحجر واحد
الأصل الصيني:
一 (한 일): واحد
石 (돌 석): حجر
二 (두 이): اثنان
鳥 (새 조): طائر / عصفور
[독서 훈련 تدريب القراءة]
해상왕 장보고는 신라 사람들이 해적에게 붙잡혀 노비로 팔리는 것을 막기 위해 청해진을 설치하여 해적을 물리쳤다. 그뿐만 아니라 신라와 당나라, 일본 사이에서 해상 무역을 통해 막대한 부를 쌓는 일석이조의 성과를 거두었다.
أنشأ "تشانغ بو-غو" (ملك البحار) حامية "تشونغ هاي جين" لصد القرصنة، وحماية شعب مملكة شلا من الوقوع في أسر القرصنة وتباع كعبيد. ولم يكتفِ بذلك فحسب، بل حقق أيضاً إن…
확증편향
확증편향은 자신의 생각을 뒷받침하는 정보만 믿고, 반대되는 정보는 무시하는 심리 현상
'التحيز التأكيدي'ظاهرة نفسية تجعل الشخص يصدق فقط المعلومات التي تدعم رأيه ويتجاهل المعلومات المخالفة.
▫️البحث عن المعلومات التي تؤيد رأيه.
▫️وتجاهل أو التقليل من أهمية المعلومات التي تخالفه.
예:
확증편향 때문에 다른 사람 의견을 안 듣는 거야.
بسبب التحيز التأكيدي أنت لا تستمع لآراء الآخرين.
SNS를 너무 많이 보면 확증편향이 심해질 수 있어.
إذا استخدمت وسائل التواصل كثيرًا قد يزداد التحيز التأكيدي لديك.…
🔸️기절하다:
فقدان الوعي التام او الاغماء
والتركيز هنا على الحالة العقلية والوعي.
주사를 맞고 기절하는 사람이 있어요.
هناك أُناس يُغمى عليهم بعد تلقي الحقنة.
﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏
🔹️쓰러지다:
السقوط او الانهيار
عند السقوط الجسدي على الأرض أو السرير بسبب التعب، الدوار، أو حتى للجمادات.
하루 종일 공부해서 집에 오자마자 침대에 쓰러졌어요.
_
#지알
🔺️성급하다:
تسرُّع وطيش بالقرارات أو الأحكام تستعجلين قبل ما تفكرين عدل
>متسرع بالقرارات والأفكار بدون تفكير كافي
내가 성급하게 판단한 것 같아,미안해ㅜ
🔺️조급하다:
استعجال ناتج عن قلق أو توتر
تكونين مضغوطة وتستعجلين
>متوتر ومستعجل (بسبب القلق والخوف).
조급해하지 마,아직 시간 많아.
🔺️서두르다:
استعجال حركي/فعلي
مثلاً مستعجلة تبدلين حتى لا تتأخرين على الموعد
>يستعجل ، يسرع مشيته أو شغله حتى يلحق
서두르지 말고 천천히 준비해.
🔺️급하다:
مستعجل / طارئ
>لأن الوقت ضيق، أو …
🟣공허하다:
فراغ نفسي وروحي
شعور بالخواء، انعدام المعنى، أو الوحدة الداخلية.
밤에 혼자 있을 때 가끔 공허함을 느껴.
_
🔵비어 있다 (비다):
فراغ مادي ملموسا
مثلاً: الغرفة فارغة، الكاس فارغ، الثلاجة فارغة.
이 자리 비어 있어요?
_
🟢허전하다:
شعور بنقص أو غياب شيء/شخص
تحسين بالنقص لأن اكو شخص جان وياج وراح، أو مكان ناقصة قطعة اثاث مثلا.
네가 집에 가니까 너무 허전하다.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZkHU3Ps-a7/?igsh=bTNwMmV4cGpmcnJt
شنو الفرق بين 는것처럼 و 는듯이 رغم انو الاثنين ادوات تشبيه؟🫣🥸
❤3🔥2🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Learningkoreanwm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇰🇷 Korean Language | 한국 🇰🇷 @korean_language_kpop_dorama · 64,227 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“한국어 배우기 𝑬𝒂𝒔𝒚&𝑭𝒖𝒏” (@Learningkoreanwm), 605 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Learningkoreanwm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.