Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Learning Neurology

Channel

Learning Neurology

@LearningNeurology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

635subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001889426158
TypeChannel
Username@LearningNeurology
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LearningNeurology

Growth

62963563210 September 2026 — 629 subscribers11 September 2026 — 631 subscribers19 September 2026 — 635 subscribers10 September 202619 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 628–636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:19635+4
11 Sept 2026, 16:16631+2
10 Sept 2026, 00:22629first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2633.8%
1924.7%
🙏1316.9%
👏1215.6%
🥰33.90%
11.30%
💯11.30%
🤩11.30%
🤯11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 May 2026, 15:28 UTC399 views6 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

A summary of paraneoplastic Neurological syndromes along with their associated antibodies and primary cancers. Knowledge about these syndromes and their associated serological testing and malignancies is important for earlier detection, earlier start of immunotherapy, and appropriate cancer screening plan, which eventually can alter patient's outcome.

👍5👏1

2 Sept 2025, 09:59 UTC840 views13 reactionsread 10 September 2026

https://youtu.be/y50LwwQ7gCM This is a lecture I presented couple of days ago about nystagmus. I hope you find it useful. All thanks to Saudi Neurology interest club for the invitation and excellent organization. 🙏🏼🧠

🙏6🥰3👏2💯1🤩1

25 Aug 2025, 13:17 UTC769 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

A Women in her 60s brought with History of rapidly progressive cognitive decline within few months, visual/auditory hallucinations, myoclonus, and ataxia. What do you see in the brain MRI shown? What is your top Differential diagnosis? how to confirm it?

2

12 Aug 2025, 12:56 UTC641 views7 reactionsread 10 September 2026

The following is a nice case seen in general Neurology rounds. This is a man in his early 50s with unremarkable past medical history presented with transient episode of confusion lasted around 3 hours. He is back to his baseline upon evaluating him in ER. He went to pray and afterwards he started to forget recent things such as praying, seeing somebody, or basically anything that happened recently in the past. For

👏311👍1🤯1

5 Aug 2025, 15:40 UTC520 views6 reactionsread 10 September 2026

In the beginning, you can see a cluster of an electrical like, rapid jerks lasting a fraction of a second, which looked generalized, representing myoclonus. It was then followed by extensor posturing of the upper limbs, representing the tonic phase, associated with uprolling of the eyes and unresponsiveness. This was shortly followed by generalized rhythmic jerks as well, indicating clonic phase of the event. All of

🙏42

30 Jul 2025, 19:49 UTC540 views16 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

Any abnormal movement is frequently confused as seizure by many colleagues in the hospital. It is very common as Neurology practitioner to be called in the hospital or even ICU to see a patient with repetitive movement, asking you if it is a seizure, with subsequent decision regarding the need for initiation of anti-seizure medications. So what are the features that favor seizures over other differential? 1. Rhythmi

👍8👏53

19 Jul 2025, 22:46 UTC477 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Good day, The following case I saw in the past 2 weeks while covering the consultation service, hopefully you will enjoy reading through it. This is a young male in his early 20s, with past medical history remarkable for ESRD 4 years ago on hemodialysis, secondary to membranous nephropathy. He presented with ER with status epileptics requiring third line and intubation. It is worth mentioning that couple of months

👍2

2 Jul 2025, 08:25 UTC453 views0 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Poll

.

  1. A3%
  2. B13%
  3. C41%
  4. D22%
  5. E16%
  6. F6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LearningNeurology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Jul 2025, 08:25 UTCFinal Results32 voters

.

  1. A3%
  2. B13%
  3. C41%
  4. D22%
  5. E16%
  6. F6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jun 2025, 17:28 UTCFinal Results47 voters

Which of the following is the most common cranial nerve injured in case of ICA dissections?

  1. Facial nerve (VII)6%
  2. Vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII)11%
  3. Abducens nerve (VI)15%
  4. Hypoglossal nerve (XII)43%
  5. Oculomotor nerve (III)26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 7 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Family Physician
@FamilyPhysician_1 · 28,193
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Learning Neurology” (@LearningNeurology), 635 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LearningNeurology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.