Channel
@Le_Sel_de_la_Terre
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
625subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002033955770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Le_Sel_de_la_Terre |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Le_Sel_de_la_Terre |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 625 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 627 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 628 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 628 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
249 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 194 | 77.9% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 14.5% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.81% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.61% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.803% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.803% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚L'article sur les sacres secrets du Cardinal Josyf Slipyj est désormais accessible gratuitement en ligne ! Dans le numéro 136 du Le Sel de la terre, Théophane Doussau propose un article intitulé « Le précédent “Slipyj” : des sacres secrets sans l’aval de Rome ». L’auteur revient sur un épisode historique et ecclésiologique particulièrement intéressant, qui éclaire les tensions entre nécessité pastorale, fidélité à…
👍8❤2
En ce 4 août, fête de saint Dominique, nous rendons hommage au fondateur de l’Ordre des Prêcheurs, serviteur passionné de la Vérité. À travers l’étude, la prière et la prédication, saint Dominique a laissé à l’Église un héritage intellectuel et spirituel d’une fécondité exceptionnelle. Dans Le Sel de la Terre, plusieurs articles reviennent sur sa figure et sur son œuvre, notamment : - Saint Dominique, serviteur de…
❤16👍3❤🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6🙏1
❓Excommuniés ? ➡️ Si injuste soit-elle, l’excommunication proférée contre Mgr Lefebvre en 1988 et contre la FSSPX en 2026 est-elle valide d’après sa propre logique canonique ? L’abbé Gerald E. Murray, prêtre américain de l’archidiocèse de New York a soutenu une thèse en droit canonique en 1995 à l’Université pontificale grégorienne de Rome sur la validité de l’excommunication de Mgr Lefebvre et de ses fidèles. L’a…
❤25
✝️ Les sacres sans mandat du cardinal Slipyj ne se comprennent pas à partir de la seule lettre du droit. Le Sel de la Terre propose une nouvelle étude sur les sacres sans mandat du Cardinal Slipyj, en 1977, sacres qui n'ont pas encouru de sanction (ni de levée). Jean Paul II consacra même un autre évêque avec l’assistance du cardinal Slipyj, censé être excommunié ipso facto. L’article montre que tous les contre-arg…
❤13👏4
Photo, posted without a caption
❓Des sacres pour l'Église ? Le Sel de la Terre vous propose de vous replonger dans le raisonnement de Mgr Lefebvre qui l'a conduit à l'opération survie de 1988 pour comprendre ceux de 2026. Qu'est-ce que l'état de nécessité ? Y a-t-il une église conciliaire ? A quoi sont destinés les futurs évêques ? La consécration sans mandat est-elle schismatique ? Les pères dominicains répondent à toutes ces questions dans le …
❤7🤩2🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12👍2
🚨 Le Sel de la terre n°136 est enfin sorti ! Ce nouveau numéro, particulièrement dense et actuel, propose plusieurs études de fond : 📚 Des sacres pour l’Église : à l’occasion des sacres de la FSSPX, l’éditorial propose une synthèse sur les sacres sans mandat et la question de l’état de nécessité. Dans le même thème, Théophane Doussau propose une étude sur le précédent du Cardinal Slipyj, qui effectua des sacres sec…
❤15👍2👏1
Le Père Louis-Marie (O.P.) présente son étude sur l'origine des évangiles. "Quatre Évangiles solidement attestés" est un ouvrage d'apologétique historique qui répond à une question fondamentale de la foi chrétienne : la canonicité des Évangiles. Face aux interrogations sur le choix des quatre textes retenus par l'Église, le Frère Louis-Marie, O.P. articule une démonstration factuelle et rigoureuse. https://youtu.b…
❤13👍4
Connaissez-vous Notre-Dame du Sacré-Cœur ? Marie occupe une place unique dans le mystère du Sacré-Cœur de Jésus : C’est elle 👉 qui conduit au Christ, 👉 qui nous introduit dans son amour, 👉 qui nous apprend à répondre à cet amour par la confiance, la réparation et la fidélité. Cette dévotion est relativement récente, et s’est surtout développée au XIXe siècle, même si elle s’enracine dans la spiritualité du Sacré-Cœ…
❤14🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Le_Sel_de_la_Terre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Le Sel de la Terre” (@Le_Sel_de_la_Terre), 625 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Le_Sel_de_la_Terre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.