Channel
@LeSavoirEtreHumain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
804subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001826967665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LeSavoirEtreHumain |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LeSavoirEtreHumain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 804 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 810 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 811 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 December 2025 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 159 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
86 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 57.0% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 23.3% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nous pouvons vérifier/voir si la façon de penser du peuple est correcte en regardant comment fonctionne notre société, plus il y a d'erreurs de fonctionnement de notre société (par exemple : des semblables qui dorment dans nos rue) plus il y a d'erreurs dans la façon de penser/de réfléchir/de comprendre le sens de la vie/du fonctionnement des lois de la nature, et il est impossible de respecter le sens des lois de la…
👍3❤2💯1
Ceux qui fixent les règles l'ont bien compris !! De fil en aiguille, toujours avec l'obsession de rechercher pour comprendre encore un peu plus, je remarque qu'il y a un côté naïf chez nous (je m'inclus largement dedans, car je ne suis pas épargné malgré que j'en parle...) ce côté naïf de croire que les gens qui prennent les décisions de fonctionnement de notre société à notre place pensent comme nous, il est clai…
🏆1
Les conclusions du rapport sont interpellantes seulement !!! Ça c'est de leur point de vue, du notre c'est totalement inadmissible... Ils s'engagent pour protéger le peuple, ils prêtent serments d'ailleurs, heureusement tous ne sont pas comme ça, mais il y en beaucoup beaucoup trop qui le sont... ça ne devrait pas pouvoir exister... Une preuve de plus/une pièce du puzzle en plus qui permet de comprendre le problème…
😱1
Le temps 🕐 A l'école on nous a appris le temps, l'heure, les années, l'histoire. Les conjugaisons dont le premier temps c'est le présent, su, appris très rapidement, il es simple, fluide, naturel. Et là viens les autres temps, le passé, le passé antérieur, le passé composé et le futur, le futur plus que parfait, l'imparfait.... Non mais sérieusement rien que ces noms pose question..🤔 Et l'heure, cette heure qui go…
👍7❤2🙏1
Voici comment animer un atelier de désintoxication de la langue de bois pour apprendre à décrypter la Novlangue qu'utilise l'élite pour avoir autorité sur nous ! Pourquoi ne parlons-nous plus d'exploité mais uniquement de défavorisés ? Ainsi il y a que des gens qui n'ont pas de chances et il n'y a pas d'exploiteurs !!! Prenons le temps de comprendre les rouages de la rhétorique du langage que nous utilisons et que …
❤3
Interview très intéressante : les bons et les mauvais sont partout... Le discernement est l’outil indispensable pour ne pas se faire avoir (et pour ne pas se mentir à soi‑même aussi !). L’élection donne le pouvoir à ceux qui le veulent, alors que ce sont ceux qui ne veulent pas du pouvoir qui savent prendre les bonnes décisions qui défendront le bien commUN, parce que le trait le plus visible de l’humain juste est …
👏3❤2👍1
Bon-soir, Voici un deuxième volet intitulé : le masque des mots. Plus nous savons nommer, moins nous pouvons être pris pour une nouille sur patte 😅 Bonne lecture et joyeuse prise de conscience ⚛️
👍4🙏1
Bon-jour, Je suis occupé d'écrire un livre, un mélange de mon vécu et des recherches que je fais depuis 2012 à maintenant. Voici un des chapitres dont je suis occupé dessus. Tu peux me donner ton avis en commentaire ou me répondre en privé, tout avis critique est le bien venu 🙂 Belle jour-née et que tout aille bien.
👍6🙏3
Est-ce que si nous limitons les personnes morales (qui ne sont pas des personnes et encore moins morales que ce ne sont des personnes) nous règlerions pas un nombre incalculable de problèmes ? Faudrait-il encore manifester dans les rues si les règles du pouvoir/les lois de fonctionnement de notre société nous protégeaient des abus de pouvoir, empêcheraient la légalisation des OGM, que la majorité ne serait plus au t…
❤3👏3👍2
Video, posted without a caption
👍6❤4👏1
Video, posted without a caption
👍3❤2
Malcolm X disait : "Méfiez-vous des médias, parce qu'ils vous feront aimer les oppresseurs et détester les oppressés." Je me demande pourquoi l'option de ne pas payer nos impôts est privilégié à celle de trouver un moyen de décider collectivement ce que nous faisons avec nos impôts ? Normalement les transports en communs, les écoles, les hôpitaux et bien d'autres services devraient êtres gratuits, sinon il est logiq…
👍8💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LeSavoirEtreHumain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 266,426 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Objecteur de conscience ⚛️” (@LeSavoirEtreHumain), 804 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeSavoirEtreHumain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.