Channel
@Laww21C
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
793subscribers
+50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001997247690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Laww21C |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Laww21C |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 793 | +47 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 746 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 743 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 743 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,835 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
14 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 በተመሳሳይ ፆታ ጋብቻ በመስረታቸው በቤንሻንጉል ጉምዝ ክልል በባምባሲ ከተማ በቁጥጥር ስር ዋሉ! ከማህበረሰቡ ወግ፣ ባህል እንዲሁም እምነት ያፈነገጡ ግለሰቦችን በቁጥጥር ስር በማዋል ምርመራ እየተደረገባቸው መሆኑ ተገለጸ። 📌 የመረጃው ዝርዝር፦ • ቦታ፦ በቤንሻንጉል ጉምዝ ክልል፣ ባምባሲ ከተማ። • ተጠርጣሪዎች፦ ታደለ እናውጋው እና በፀሎት እንየው የተባሉ ግለሰቦች በተመሳሳይ ፆታ ጋብቻ በመመስረታቸው በቁጥጥር ስር ውለዋል። • የፖሊስ ምላሽ፦ በማህበረሰቡ ጥቆማና ተጠርጣሪዎቹም የእምነት ቃላቸውን በሰጡት መሠረት ፖሊስ ተገቢውን የምርመራ ስራ መጀመሩንና በቀጣይ ውጤቱን ይፋ እንደሚያደርግ ገልጿል። (ምንጭ፦ የባምባሲ ከተማ አስተዳደር መንግስት ኮሙኒኬ…
🤬1😁1
በአዋጅ ቁጥር 322/1995 መሰረት የፌዴራል ከፍተኛ ፍርድ ቤት በተደራጀባቸው ክልሎች ያሉ የክልል ከፍተኛ ፍርድ ቤቶች በኢፌዲሪ ሕገ መንግስት አንቀጽ 78(2) እና 80(4) ድንጋጌ በተሰጣቸዉ የፌዴራል መጀመሪያ ደረጃ ፍርድ ቤት የዉክልና ስልጣናቸዉ በቀጥታ ያዩዋቸዉን የፌዴራል ጉዳዮች በይግባኝ የማየት ስልጣን ያላቸዉ የክልል ጠቅላይ ፍርድ ቤቶች ሳይሆኑ በክልሉ እንዲደራጁ የተደረጉት የፌዴራል ከፍተኛ ፍርድ ቤቶች ናቸው። ሰ/መ/ቁጥር 271003 (ሰኔ 25 ቀን 2018 ዓ.ም) https://t.me/Laww21C
እነ ሰራዊት ፍቅሬ ነገ አርብ ፍርድ ቤት በድጋሚ እንዲቀርቡ ትዕዛዝ ተሰጠ። ከፊንቴክ ኢንቨስትመንት ማጭበርበር ወንጀል ጋር ተያይዞ በተጠረጠሩ አርቲስቶችና የማስታወቂያ ባለሙያዎች በእነ ሰራዊት ፍቅሬ አጠቃላይ 7 ሰዎች ነገ ፍርድ ቤት እንዲቀርቡ ትዕዛዝ ተሰጠ። ትዕዛዙን የሰጠው የፌደራል ከፍተኛ ፍ/ቤት ልደታ ምድብ 2ኛ ልዩ ልዩ ወንጀል ችሎት ነው። የፍትህ ሚኒስቴር የተደራጁና ድንበር ተሻጋሪ ጉዳዮች ዳሪክቶሬት ዐቃቢህግ ተጠርጣሪዎቹ ከሳምንት በፊት "እግረኛው" በተሰኘ የማኅበራዊ ሚዲያ (ዩቱዩብ ) ላይ ቀርበው ማስረጃ ተሰምቶ ባልተጠናቀበት መዝገብ ላይ ዝርዝር መግለጫ መስጠታቸው አግባብ እንዳልሆነ እና በፍትህ አሰጣጥ ሂደቱ ላይ ተጽዕኖ የሚያሳድ…
#የምትክ ዳኛ ዋና ተግባራት እና ስልጣናት #በኢትዮጵያ የፍትሐብሔር ሥነ-ሥርዓት ሕግ ቁጥር 124፣ 125፣ 132-134 ድንጋጌዎች መሠረት፣ የምትክ ዳኛ (Commissioner) ዋና የሥልጣን ክልል ፍርድ ቤቱ የክርክሩን ፍሬ ነገር በበለጠ ሁኔታ ለማጣራት እንዲችል እውነታውን የማረጋገጥ እና መረጃዎችን የማሰባሰብ ተግባር ላይ ያተኩራል (ሰ/መ/ቁ. 222624)። ምትክ ዳኛው በፍርድ ቤት የሚሰጠውን የውክልና ሥልጣን መሠረት በማድረግ የቀረበለትን ጉዳይ በዝርዝር ለማጣራት የሚያስችሉ ሰፊ ሥልጣኖች የተሰጡት ሲሆን፣ በሹመት ትእዛዙ ላይ በግልጽ ሌላ መመሪያ ካልተሰጠ በስተቀር ተከራካሪ ወገኖችንና እነርሱ የሚያቀርቧቸውን ምስክሮች የመመርመር ሥልጣን አለው (ፍ/ስ/…
👍2😁1
የክፍት ሥራ ቦታ ማስታወቂያ ማስተካከያ የፍትህ ሚኒስቴር በሀምሌ 17 ቀን 2018 ዓ.ም ባወጣው ክፍት የሥራ ማስታወቂያ ላይ የተቀመጠው አጠቃላይ የትምህርት ውጤት (CGPA) መስፈርት ማስተካከያ ተደርጎበታል። በዚሁ መሠረት የሚፈለገው ውጤት፦ * ለወንድ አመልካቾች: 3.6 እና ከዚያ በላይ * ለሴት አመልካቾች: 3.25 እና ከዚያ በላይ ተደርጎ የተሻሻለ መሆኑን እየገለጽን፤ ተወዳዳሪዎች ይህንኑ አውቃችሁ ማመልከት የምትችሉ መሆኑን እናሳውቃለን።
❤2
21C Legal Affair pinned «🌟 UNLOCK THE FUTURE OF LAW WITH 21C LAW VS PRACTICE! 🌟 Are you ready to elevate your legal knowledge? Join our vibrant community on Telegram and gain access to a treasure trove of FREE legal resources that will empower you in your practice! 🔑 WHAT WE OFFER:👇…»
🌟 UNLOCK THE FUTURE OF LAW WITH 21C LAW VS PRACTICE! 🌟 Are you ready to elevate your legal knowledge? Join our vibrant community on Telegram and gain access to a treasure trove of FREE legal resources that will empower you in your practice! 🔑 WHAT WE OFFER:👇 • 📚 Comprehensive Legal Resources: Explore a vast collection of laws, regulations, and guidelines. • 🧠 Expert Insights: Stay updated with the latest legal trend…
👍1
21C Legal Affair pinned «❗️❗️ፀበል ⚖️ የሰበር ውሳኔ | የሰ.መ.ቁ. 227120 ታህሳስ 27/2015 #ዋና_ፍሬ_ነገር ከእምነት ተቋም (ፀበል) የተሰጠ የፀበል መቆየት ማስረጃ በሕግ ከታወቀ የሕክምና ተቋም የተሰጠ የሕክምና ማስረጃን አይተካም። ስለዚህ፣ ከተፈቀደው የሕክምና እረፍት በኋላ ከሥራ ለመቅረት የቀረበ የፀበል ማስረጃ በቂ ሕጋዊ ምክንያት ስላልሆነ፣ ከ5 ተከታታይ ቀናት በላይ ያለፈቃድ ከሥራ መቅረት ሕጋዊ ስንብትን…»
❗️❗️ፀበል ⚖️ የሰበር ውሳኔ | የሰ.መ.ቁ. 227120 ታህሳስ 27/2015 #ዋና_ፍሬ_ነገር ከእምነት ተቋም (ፀበል) የተሰጠ የፀበል መቆየት ማስረጃ በሕግ ከታወቀ የሕክምና ተቋም የተሰጠ የሕክምና ማስረጃን አይተካም። ስለዚህ፣ ከተፈቀደው የሕክምና እረፍት በኋላ ከሥራ ለመቅረት የቀረበ የፀበል ማስረጃ በቂ ሕጋዊ ምክንያት ስላልሆነ፣ ከ5 ተከታታይ ቀናት በላይ ያለፈቃድ ከሥራ መቅረት ሕጋዊ ስንብትን ያስከትላል። ✅ ውሳኔ: የሰራተኛዋ ስንብት ሕጋዊ ነው፤ የሥር ፍርድ ቤቶች ውሳኔም በሰበር ጸንቷል። https://t.me/Laww21C #React_on_posts
❤3
በኤሌክትሪክ አደጋ ምክንያት ለሚደርስ ጉዳት ተገልጋዮች ከአገልግሎት ሰጪው እውቅና እና ፈቃድ ውጭ በራሳቸው በሚዘረጉት የኤሌክትሪክ መስመር ለሚደርሰው ጉዳት አገልግሎት ሰጪው ተቋም ተጠያቂ አይሆንም። እንደ ኤሌክትሪክ አደጋ ባሉ የቴክኒክ ጉዳዮች ላይ የአደጋውን መንስኤ ለማወቅ በፖሊስ የሚደረግ የባለሙያ (Forensic) ምርመራ ከፍተኛ የማስረጃነት ዋጋ (High Probative Value) አለው። ይህንን የባለሙያ ምርመራ ውጤት ያለ በቂ ምክንያት ወደ ጎን በማለት ውሳኔ መስጠት መሠረታዊ የሕግ ስህተት ነው። አገልግሎት ሰጪው ኃላፊነት የሚኖርበት እሱ ራሱ በዘረጋውና ባለቤት በሆነበት መስመር ላይ ለሚደርስ ጉዳት ብቻ ነው። በተገልጋዮች ጥፋት ለሚደርስ አደጋ …
🚨 የውርስ ሕግ ወሳኝ የሰበር ውሳኔ! የልጅ ልጅ የአያቱን ውርስ ለመውረስ የሚችለው በምን ሁኔታ ነው? በፍትሐብሔር ሕግ ቁጥር 842(3) መሠረት የተተኪ ወራሽነት የሚሠራው የመካከለኛው ወራሽ (አባት/እናት) ከአውራሹ (ከአያት) ቀድሞ ሲሞት ብቻ ነው! ⚖️ በሰበር መዝገብ ቁጥር 110040 የተሰጠውን ሙሉ ሕጋዊ ትንታኔ እና አስገዳጅ ውሳኔ ከታች ያንብቡ👇 1. የጉዳዩ መነሻ አመልካቾች፦ ወ/ሮ አልታማሪያም አክሊሉ እና ሌሎች የጉዳዩ ሁኔታ፦ አመልካቾች የአያታቸውን (የወላጅ አባታቸውን እናት) የሀብት ወራሽነት ለማረጋገጥ ላቀረቡት ጥያቄ፣ የወላጅ አባታቸው የወራሽነት መብት አስቀድሞ ተረጋግጦ እንደነበር ገልጸዋል። የስር ፍርድ ቤቶች ውሳኔ፦ አመልካቾች ያ…
የጥፋተኝነት ድርድር” (plea bargaining) ማለት ምን ማለት ነው? Plea bargaining (የጥፋተኝነት ድርድር) ማለት በወንጀል ፍትህ ስርአት ውስጥ ተከሳሽ (defendant) ከአቃቤ ሕግ (prosecutor) ጋር ጥፋተኛ ነኝ ብሎ ከስምምነት ሲደርስ የሚፈጠር ሂደት ነው። አዲሱ የወንጀል ስነስርዓትና የማስረጃ ሕጋችንም አዋጅ ቁጥር 1410/2018ዓ.ም ከአንቀጽ 169-179 ባሉት ድንጋጌዎች ይህን ሀሳብ ይዞ ተከስቷል በአሜሪካ የወንጀል ፍትህ ስርአት ያለው ሚና የወንጀል ጉዳዮች ከ90% በላይ መደበኛ ክርክር ሳይደረግባቸው በጥፋተኝነት ድርድር(Plea bargaining) እልባት እያገኙ ነው በዚህም መሰረት የሚያስገኛቸው ትሩፋቶች:- 1ኛ. የቅጣት …
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Laww21C. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,381,230 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“21C Legal Affair” (@Laww21C), 793 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Laww21C.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.