Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔒 #𝟤𝟨.𝐋ɑׁ𝕣Ꭵᩧᧉ‌sׅ꯱ // 𝕗l͟͟ꭷꭷ𝖽

@LariessFld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003726166874
TypeChannel
Username@LariessFld
Descriptionㅤ 🍓ㅤ « сꭎȶᧉ‌ ℓ𐐼riᧉ‌ss » ⵌ ϐлɑдᧉ‌лицɑ : @SH0NYA — ꯱t𐐼‌ɾt : ( 𝟤𝟤. 𝟢𝟦. 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨 ) ❕
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 26 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LariessFld

Growth

509 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 50 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 11:45 — 50 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:1710 Aug 2026, 11:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:4550no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:1750first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
6
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5292224522781503017920.0%
custom 5291973056741287386613.3%
custom 5292291850688834561613.3%
custom 5307921932463668881511.1%
custom 529174739915955537348.89%
custom 529440635757793185548.89%
custom 529645896539833107448.89%
custom 530750549672961874348.89%
custom 530760555658271692636.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LariessFld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC38 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SealadeFld

. ִָ🍎ˑ 𑂘ᧉ‌ׅɑℓɑׁ𝕕ᧉ‌⭑𝕟ɑׁvᎥᩧᧁαtᎥᩧᨵׁׅׅ𝕟🍎 ࣪៹ ˖ ﹘ . ➿🎀➿ 🎀 ➿🎀➿ . ﹘ 또 다시 한번 ᨢִrᧉɑ𑀱ჩִᧉ ⭐️ ࣪ ˖ ִ ׄ ⌗ ꭈׁꭷℓᧉ‌ׅ꯴ 🐌 rυׁׅℓᧉ‌ઽ ۫ ׁ . ഒ ꒰ 🍎 ꒱ ‹‹ ℓᨵׁׅׅvᧉ‌ℓყ υ𝕟Ꭵᩧꭷnׅ꯱ !!🍒 ִִ۫ ⋆ ☕☕거친 박동은 🍓 𝕕ɑׁׅnᧁᧉ𐑾 𝟫𝟣 ៸៸ ꭈׁᧉ‌𑂘ɬ & cℓᧉ‌ɑׁׅ𝕟Ꭵᩧnᧁׁ 🍓 𝖲𝖫𝖣🎀 ࣪ ⊹ ˖ 🍓🍓 Ꭵᩧ𝕟iɬiɑׁℓ꯱ 𖥔 ɑdꭑᎥᩧnƨ😻 ☕🍎 겁낼 것 없이 c𑄹‌ოᧉ Ꭵᩧn ᯏ 🎀ρִׄαɬᧉ𝕟ե ೀ۫ 𝕕ᧉ‌ƨᎥᩧᧁׁn 🎀🍏 ᭝ 💿 ֺ ܸ ๑ ᨢִⱺⱺƨ𑀱 — 𑀱Ꭵᩧk ɬ𐐫k ݁ ᩧ ׅ

6 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC68 viewsread 10 August 2026

брибет а вы в курсе шо у меня уже открылся новый флуд?

30 Jun 2026, 18:03 UTC260 viewsread 10 August 2026

Всем привет, мои пупсички!! ЧИТАТЬ ПОСТ ДО КОНЦА если коротко, то лариес с сегодняшнего дня закрыты. Я планировала отправить ОГРОМНЫЙ пост о том, почему лариес (кариес) теперь закрыты, но мне показалось, что там было упомянуто много лишнего. Поэтому я просто сообщаю о закрытии. НО.. есть хорошая новость!! (для кого-то плохая). Уже скоро у меня появится новый флуд. Канал уже создан, была бы рада подписчикам. https://

29 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC118 viewsread 10 August 2026

скоро я буду разрывать со многими флудами союзы, поэтому готовьтесь. 😃 ещё возможно лариес ждёт закрытие

28 Jun 2026, 20:23 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

кал ищем нью быстрее пожалуйста все к нам

custom 52922245227815030173

28 Jun 2026, 17:01 UTC156 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

˖ ִ ۫ #.𝖫𝖱𝖲.𝐍ᧉ‌ω ꒰ !! ꒱ 𝐔nᎥᩧꭷn 🍓 ۫ ׅ. ׁ +О𝟤𝟨 💫 𝖫ɑׁ𝕣Ꭵᩧᧉ‌sׅ꯱ & ׅ꯱ɑׁ𐐫rᎥᩧ

custom 52917473991595553731custom 52919730567412873861custom 52922245227815030171custom 52922918506888345611custom 52964589653983310741custom 53076055565827169261custom 53079219324636688811

28 Jun 2026, 09:50 UTC112 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

˖ ִ ۫ #.𝖫𝖱𝖲.𝐍ᧉ‌ω ꒰ !! ꒱ 𝐔nᎥᩧꭷn 🍓 ۫ ׅ. ׁ +О𝟤𝟨 💫 𝖫ɑׁ𝕣Ꭵᩧᧉ‌sׅ꯱ & 𝐂υׁׅɬ౿

custom 52919730567412873861custom 52922245227815030171custom 52922918506888345611custom 52964589653983310741custom 53075054967296187431custom 53079219324636688811

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LariessFld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,268,019 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔒 #𝟤𝟨.𝐋ɑׁ𝕣Ꭵᩧᧉ‌sׅ꯱ // 𝕗l͟͟ꭷꭷ𝖽” (@LariessFld), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LariessFld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.