Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

« 𝐋𝕒𝚗𝖾 ძ𝐢𝖺𝕣𝚢 »

@LaneTADC67

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

23subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003412936876
TypeChannel
Username@LaneTADC67
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LaneTADC67

Growth

232423.510 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 24 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:18 — 24 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:11 — 23 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 22:1511 Aug 2026, 17:11
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:1123-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:1824no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:1524first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.2%
avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total516
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1235.3%
🦄1132.4%
👻720.6%
🐳25.88%
🕊25.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

— Привет-привет. Как ваши дела? У меня вот довольно неплохо. Правда, не так давно я ходила на довольно.. странное тестирование виар очков. И если честно, было так себе..😨 Вместо обещанного тестирования какой-то бесплатной игрушки, мы оказались в непонятном белом пространстве. Там ещё было много копий участвующих в тестировании, правда у меня была всего одна. Хотя, с какой-то стороны это даже хорошо... Организаторы вс

2 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

Девушка все это время стояла немного в стороне, стараясь особо не влезать в диалог куклы и своей копии. В конце концов сейчас её это не особо волновало. Но когда они решили осмотреться и пройтись по этому месту Лейн немного оживилась. — Тогда пошлите! Недолго думая Лейн взяла за руки девушек и повела их за собой ближе к шатру. Снаружи не было ничего интересного, только разбросанные предметы и много людей, поэтому Лей

28 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC37 viewsread 11 August 2026

Девушка кивнула в ответ на её краткий рассказ об их «доме». Лейн рассказ показался странноватым, но она ничего про это не сказала и почти сразу ответила кукле. — Интересно.. Я живу в обычном городе в Канаде. Учусь, работаю.. Ничего интересного в целом. Блондинка в очередной раз вздохнула и замолчала не особо углубляясь в подробности своей жизни. Легкое напряжение так и не испарилось, а нарушать тишину между ними никт

28 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

— Нет?.. Я живу в Канаде, а наш Кейн телеведущий. Но мне было бы интересно послушать про ваш цирк. Лейн ответила ей, немного удивившись. Она на самом деле и не думала о том, что кто-то может жить не в самом обычном городе, так что слова Лави немного сбили её с толку. 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Tags: #Rp #EVENT

💘1

27 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

— Красивое имя! Эм.. Думаю, мое ты уже знаешь. После этих слов Лейн постаралась искренне улыбнуться собеседнице, но к сожалению у неё не получилось выдавить из себя хоть какую-то улыбку. Когда Лави упомянула декорации, девушка немного замялась, не понимая про что вообще идет речь. Но она всё же решила поинтересоваться ими, чтобы хоть как-то поддержать разговор — Верхние декорации? Я не совсем понимаю про что ты.. 🎀🎀

💘1

27 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

— Да, думаю, ты права. Хорого, что у меня пока что только один клон. Девушка перевела взгляд на свою копию за спиной куклы, а после уже на неё саму. Для начала Лейн решила узнать как зовут её собеседницу. Нужно же хоть как-то к ней обращаться — Так... Как тебя зовут? 🤍 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Tags: #Rp #EVENT

27 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пока девушки обнимались Лейн в очередной раз оглянулась по сторонам. Людей много, но вот кто из них её знакомые? Нужно подойти к кому-то ещё.. — Ладно, не буду вам мешать Вздохнув она уже хотела уйти, но Лави остановила ее 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Tags: #Rp #EVENT

26 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

— Не думаю, что мы с тобой знакомы.. Не увидев поблизости никого из знакомых Лейн вздохнула и ответила кукле, так как выбора у неё особо не было. Да и если они и были знакомы, то не могла же она забыть её полностью. После нескольких секунд молчания девушка снова заговорила с девочками. Все де нужно было хотя бы узнать где они сейчас находятся. — Если я правильно понимаю, то вы тоже не знаете где мы?🤍 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Ta

💘2🐳1🦄1

26 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC30 viewsread 11 August 2026

Девушка резко обернулась когда кто то её окликнул. Присмотревшись, она увидела перед собой шарнирную куклу, которая даже не дав ей ничего сказать, уже за что-то извинялась перед ней упомянув её знакомого. — ..Что?- Не успела она договорить, как откуда то сверху свалилась.. Её копия? Отшатнувшись назад девушка отошла на пару шагов и оглянулась по сторонам в надежде увидеть кого-то из своих знакомых. 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Tags

26 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ... — П-подождите! Тестирование точно должно проходить ТАК?.. На почту мне писали про другое!!- ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎ ⠀︎⚫️д 🄴 𝓜 ы 𝓑𝐨𝐨бщ𝐞?! 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Tags: #Rp #EVENT

🐳1💘1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LaneTADC67. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,099,406 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“« 𝐋𝕒𝚗𝖾 ძ𝐢𝖺𝕣𝚢 »” (@LaneTADC67), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LaneTADC67.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.