Channel name was changed to «✨Ваш любимый ведущий✨ [REST]»
![Telegram profile photo for ✨Ваш любимый ведущий✨ [REST]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/0f/0f260fe3addd67c37b2c852b56936f4c439388836b7ad9d10c0209e9d2c0b12a.jpg)
Channel
✨Ваш любимый ведущий✨ [REST]
@DTNCaine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004324577992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DTNCaine |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DTNCaine |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 37 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 94.4%
- avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 34.9
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 629 |
| Reactions total | 58 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 37.9% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 34.5% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 19.0% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😈😯👋🫁😈😯👋🫁😈😯👋🫁 — Кажется, Кейн устал от рутины и хочет передохнуть! #rest <<Просьба временно не беспокоить!>>
❤1🔥1
🌟🌟❔❔❔🌟🌟 ... Н-ничего, ничего, я тебя понимаю. М-мх...🌟 *Кейн отвёл взгляд, нерешительный и слегка обиженный, но, в целом, понимающий. Он бы, возможно, отреагировал похоже, будь здесь несколько... Винсентов. Однако глаза встретились с чужими. Глазами того, кто был ему, Кейну, подобен. *Это странно — смотреть в собственные глаза, не имея рядом зеркала. Это пугает, и одновременно завораживает. От невидимое горло сжало…
❤1🍓1🔥1
🌟🌟❕❕❕🌟🌟 ... Ты что, не узнаешь меня?! Посмотри на него, а потом на меня! Да, мы похожи, но не настолько! Я выше, я ношу свою любимую жилетку и, в конце-то концов, очки! А он — нет. Мало того, я видел, как он... Левитировал! ☠️ Я уверен, что это всё какой-то баг, и мои, и не только, цифровые копии появились из ниоткуда. Здесь даже есть копии одного хирурга, о котором я наслышан, и-и много кого ещё, на самом деле! …
💘3💋1🔥1
🌟🌟🔠🔠❕🌟🌟 "Он проснулся! Он проснулся! О-он жив! Неужели?! Ура!" П-прости, пожалуйста... Я думал, что с тобой что-то случилось! Как ты себя чувствуешь? Ничего не болит? М-может, тебе помочь подняться? Ты очень долго был без сознания, дружище... Я и правда смел подумать, что ты на пути в мир иной! Прости мне эту слабость, если сможешь...⭐️
❤3
🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 Это место выглядит бесконечным. Оно... Странное. И все вокруг странные. Они выглядят одновременно знакомыми и... Чужими. ⭐️⭐️ Со связью здесь бедно. Туго. То есть, то нет, и вообще непонятно, где мы. Я не знаю, когда это сообщение отправится. Часы не идут. Я не знаю, который час, сколько времени прошло, но, по ощущениям, более суток... Но голода я не чувствую, как и жажды. Это... Радует? Винсент не поднимае…
❤5💘3
Posted without readable text
❤2🔥2🥰2💘1
Channel name was changed to «✨Ваш любимый ведущий✨ [EVENT]»
ㅤ⚠️::➖ы верите в теорию мультивселенных? а может альтернативных реальностей? Они существуют. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ㅤ🔠егодня обычный день, такой, чуть ярче чем прошлые серые будни. Вам поступило приглашение поучаствовать в закрытом бета-тесте VR программы без права на отказ, но кто захочет пропускать движуху? Все проходит хорошо, система работает исправно... ㅤ🔠о это было-бы не интересно, верно? В коде программы произошел сбо…
🤩 Лучше и сказать нельзя! Вы как всегда говорите о самом важном и близком широкому зрителю, о том, про что безусловно важно напоминать! Премного благодарю. Что ж, а на сегодня наше интервью окончено. До встречи на следующей неделе! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 *щелчок. Запись остановлена. Кейн поворачивается к собеседнику.* ... Винсент, приятель... Спасибо, что согласился на эту... Авантюру. Теперь нам обоим самое время отдохнуть…
💘1
🤩Ох, неожиданно, весьма неожиданно! Впрочем, я не имею права не согласиться с вашим мнением. Ведь и правда, именно чувства делают наше творчество... Творческим. По-настоящему живым и отзывающимся у аудитории. Особенно этот аспект важен, если мы смотрим на проблему с учётом ИИ... В общем, вы как всегда последовательны и гениальны в своих рассуждениях, мой друг, и прошу не скромничать! Однако, увы, у каждой беседы гени…
💘3🔥2❤1
🤩 Именно поэтому я и спросил вас, хотите ли вы рассказать больше. В конце-то концов, я уважаю ваше право на приватность точно так же, как и своё! И-и вообще, главное здесь то, что вы нашли ту сферу, в которой вам нравится развиваться! К слову, те, кто позже будет читать статью с текстовой версией этого интервью либо смотреть его в записи, смогут найти ссылки на ваши статьи. Я думаю, что ваши работы более, чем достойн…
❤1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DTNCaine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 831,319 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Vincent_Digital_Net · 212 postsCAINE’s KINGDOM
@caine_digitaliaweb · 461 postAmazing Digital Circus
@circus · 1,0641 post[ ИВЕНТ ] digit𝗮l « пр𝗼дж𝗲🄺т » ᐟ❱❱ㅤ
@digital_project0 · 911 postDigitalTown.Net [DTN]
@DigitalTownNet · 711 post« 𝐋𝕒𝚗𝖾 ძ𝐢𝖺𝕣𝚢 »
@LaneTADC67 · 231 postⲊⲣυⲇⲋⲩ'ⲋ ⲥⲉⲧⲕⲁ
@SpudsysSetka · 1481 post⇶ ˏˏ 〘 𝖢𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗌 ↺ 𝘯𝘦𝘵 〙
@tadc_CSnet · 1201 post˖ ࣪⊹the 𝑫𝑰𝑮𝑰𝑻𝑨𝑳𝑰𝑨 ! ᯤ࣪ 𖦹
@theDIGITALIA · 1151 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DTNCaine named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✨Ваш любимый ведущий✨ [REST]” (@DTNCaine), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DTNCaine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.