Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Landskamp

@Landskamp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003829514145
TypeChannel
Username@Landskamp
DescriptionKamporgan for Nasjonalt Nettverk og nasjonalsosialismen i Norge. NN: @NasjonaltNettverk Bli med i kampen: t.me/NasjonaltNettverk?direct
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 8 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Landskamp

Growth

1116 August 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 111 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:48111no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:25111first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4037.0%
3532.4%
🔥1816.7%
💯1413.0%
👎10.926%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 13:34 UTC347 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

28 Mai: Minnedag for Eva Helgetun Vi skal aldri glemme deg, Eva Helgetun. Du var en ung norsk jente som ble utsatt for noe av de mest grusomme og umenneskelige som finnes på denne planet. Monstrene som gjorde dette mot deg skal en dag få sin straff for sine ugjerninger – og det samme gjelder massemediene som bevisst valgte å begrave saken og legge lokk over den. Vi hviler ikke før vi forhindrer at slikt skjer igje

24

13 May 2026, 15:02 UTC397 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Nasjonalt Nettverk og Landskamps syn på politisk vold og terror Vi har sett hvordan raseriet til individer i bevegelsen har utviklet seg gjennom årene, der «ensomme ulver» prøver å få ut en politisk eller ideologisk beskjed til massene og endring på systemet via soloterror. Dette fungerer ikke. Nøkkelen er å tenke over hvem som tjener på det. Hva har systemet tjent? Så langt har systemet og våre forøvrige politisk

14🔥11👎1

8 May 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,150 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Landskamps mål og fokus Tidligere har Landskamp hovedsakelig vært en nyhetskanal der vi har videreformidlet saker massemediene ikke tør å ta opp. Men etter omorganiseringen av Nasjonalt Nettverk tar vi en ny vinkel. Vi beveger oss vekk fra å fokusere utelukkende på nyhetssaker, ettersom det allerede finnes flere aktører som gjør dette. Derimot ser vi at det i stor grad mangler objektiv informasjon om nasjonalsosial

💯1410🔥3

8 May 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,640 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Vi er tilbake! I september 2025 la vi ned Nasjonalt Nettverk og våre undergruppers offentlige virksomhet. Valget ble tatt ettersom eksterne omstendigheter satte våre aktivisters anonymitet i fare. Det ble derfor internt besluttet å trekke oss midlertidig tilbake. Etter å ha grundig vurdert vårt neste trekk i dette metapolitiske sjakkspillet, har vi nå kommet til den klare konklusjonen om å reorganisere Nasjonalt Ne

1611🔥4

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @Landskamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,561 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Landskamp” (@Landskamp), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Landskamp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.