Channel
@LaZyFuji_san
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002159870691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LaZyFuji_san |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LaZyFuji_san |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 153 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 154 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 156 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 157 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 157 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5417864028565293832 | 22 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5274102634125494223 | 21 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5298952855338641643 | 17 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5363843845471613237 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5424766668075187009 | 11 | 8.66% | |
| custom 5195248971601175630 | 9 | 7.09% | |
| custom 5276077172325375233 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 5.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5272003937010991328 | 5 | 3.94% | |
| custom 5289643140062407697 | 5 | 3.94% | |
| custom 6014572510832498182 | 2 | 1.57% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.787% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LaZyFuji_san. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
хотите летний фотос в Рем?⭐️
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩стафета от Хакито😴 🌟🌟🌟😘😭🌟🌟🌟 –🔤адо сделать коллаж с эстетикой персонажа, которого вы делали последним 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 эстафету передаю @Rin_drobivikk 💜 💜 @Vaaaaanyes
custom 51952489716011756305custom 52741026341254942235custom 53638438454716132373custom 52720039370109913282
🎥🎥🥹🤩стафета от жан🥹 🎥🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩адо сделать коллаж с эстетикой персонажа, которого вы делали последним,,🥹 🤩ередаю: 🎀коки 🎥🍼фуджи 🎀аруука
–как думаете на кого из Эвер Афтер хай мне стоит делать косплей?все персонажи безумно красивые,но хотелось бы определиться🤩 могу точно сказать,что будет закос на Эпл Уайт в ближайшее время👍 а еще извиняюсь за задержку поста в Сиджвин,я пока не в городе и не могу уложить паричок😢 #щп
–сегодня со мной и Мари чан на кагаяки сфоталось оочень много людей и была туча комплиментов,мне было очень приятно!!кто фотался со мной киньте фотки в комменты плис🤩 был сегодня с любимкой @darkMarichan 💛
custom 51952489716011756303❤🔥2custom 53638438454716132372
–спасибо за звездочку!!
💜💜💜💜💜👻👻👻 🖤🖤 💓💓💓💓💓💓💓 🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣 🖤🖤 🖤🖤 🖤🖤🥐 @darkMarichan ⚡️ 🧅 @shelter_newii 🤩 me 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #косплей #яэмико #скарамучча #райден РТ,РЕАКЦИИ🌟
custom 53638438454716132378custom 52989528553386416436🐳4custom 52720039370109913283custom 52896431400624076971
藤*ೃ༄𝘭𝘢𝘻𝘺 𝘍𝘶𝘫𝘪 𝘴𝘢𝘯𓍢ִ໋🎐͙֒ pinned a photo
–давайте побольше реактов и будет постик в Сиджвин🥵
–не намекаю,но в тик токе новые видосики🥺 www.tiktok.com/@fujiwiwiwi
👩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🐾 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 🖤🖤 –じゃあた、たびびとさん！ 🖤🖤🗝🗝 🖤🖤🗝🗝 🖤🖤 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #Ситлали #косплей #Фудживара РТ,РЕАКЦИИ🥺
custom 527410263412549422316custom 54178640285652938328custom 52760771723253752337custom 52896431400624076973🐳2custom 60145725108324981822❤🔥1custom 51952489716011756301
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥2custom 52760771723253752331
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @LaZyFuji_san. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
хотите летний фотос в Рем?⭐️
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РЕСТ!!藤*ೃ༄𝘭𝘢𝘻𝘺 𝘍𝘶𝘫𝘪 𝘴𝘢𝘯𓍢ִ໋🎐͙֒” (@LaZyFuji_san), 153 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LaZyFuji_san.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.