Dieser Hurensohn soll am selben Galgen baumeln wie Drosten.

Channel
Scholten News
@L_Scholten
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001267524185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @L_Scholten |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/L_Scholten |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.4%
- avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 88 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,600
- Videos
- ≈7,420
- Links
- ≈14,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Und die restlichen 20 Prozent haben auch nur einen deutschen Pass.
Bücherverbrennungen waren per se keine schlechte Idee, es kommt nur auf die richtige Auswahl an. "Das Kapital" brennt ähnlich gut wie der Koran.
Sollte er da wirklich zahlen müssen, übernehme ich das gerne. Einfach bei mir melden. Ehrensache.
Homburg zur Busfahrer-Story: „Zufällig vorbeikommender Busfahrer erlegt Semtex-Drohne per Fußtritt! Sämtliche Leitmedien finden das glaubhaft. Aber auch NIUS und Apollo fallen auf den absurdesten Nonsens herein, seit Chinesen die Straßen von Viren reinigten. Hintergrund: Einige fürchten, Berlin wolle den Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall ausrufen, mit noch krasseren Lockdowns. Das ist unplausibel, denn Kriegsvorber…
Ich möchte diesen Hochverräter an einem Galgen baumeln sehen, zwischen Robert und Annalena. Und Bärbel. Und Karl. Und Nancy. Und Lisa. Hach, die Liste ist verdammt lang...
Dieser verschissene islamistische Kommunisten-Bastard ist übrigens dagegen, dass sich Menschen bei der Teilnahme an der US-Präsidentenwahl ausweisen. Aber um in seinem scheiß kommunistischen Supermarkt einen Apfel zu kaufen, müssen sie sich ausweisen. Kommunistenschweine tun halt Kommunistenschweinedinge.
In Deutschland gibt es mehr als 400.000 Volljuristen. Dass nur etwa 0,25 Prozent davon so doof sind, ernsthaft zu glauben, ein solches Verbotsverfahren hätte auch nur den Hauch einer Aussicht auf Erfolg, ist eigentlich ein gutes Zeichen, denn es spricht für eine außerordentlich geringe Idiotendichte in diesem Berufsstand. Wobei nicht auszuschließen ist, dass diese 0,25 Prozent vielleicht gar nicht so doof sind, sond…
Falsch! Faschismus, Sozialismus, Kommunismus und Demokratie ist alles derselbe totalitäre Dreck, nur jeweils mit einer anderen Erzählung. Das Gegenteil von alldem ist FREIHEIT!
Oder er muss ein paar geniale Ideen haben, dicke Eier und persönliche Risikobereitschaft. Wobei ihm das in der EU und insbesondere in Deutschland auch nichts hilft, weil er scheitern würde an einer schwerstkriminellen Bande von intellektuell Minderbemittelten, Ungebildeten, Faulenzern, Strauchdieben, Größenwahnsinnigen, Dilettanten, Taugenichtsen, Hochstaplern, Vollversagern, Durchgeknallten, Skrupellosen und machtg…
Mein Wunsch wäre eine Welt ohne dumme Weiber, die gequirlte Scheiße reden.
Noch besser wäre gewesen, er hätte angeordnet, diese Privatangelegenheit einiger weniger Einzelner grundsätzlich nicht mit vom Steuerzahler unter Androhung tödlicher Gewalt erpresstem Geld zu unterstützen, zu keiner Zeit und unter keinen Umständen. Denn es ist - wie gesagt - eine reine Privatangelegenheit. Aber gut - nobody is perfect. Auch nicht der Donald. Steuern sind Raub!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @L_Scholten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scholten News” (@L_Scholten), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/L_Scholten.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.