@sindredo @Ainstyinge @tharil68 @biggypee @squadwore @CryptoK3vin @Fadi12312 @grammypee @Hillymann @hetomick @geemick @Flyyhigh2 @chilkyy @speedygonzaluez @lillamap @Fearlesspee @Heemano @mindkem @Namelesshero12 @teylor45598 @immagonnafly @abinash1239 @ThaiMaiSju @catjustcat5 Maxim Please make sure to join my main channel @Mushapeplays ❤️

Channel
LUXURY CALLS 101
@LUXURYCALLS101
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001581959263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LUXURYCALLS101 |
| Description | ONLY PAID CALLS UNLESS YOU ARE A HUGE CRYPTO PROJECT! WE ARE ABOUT 100% ORGANIC GROWTH! NO BOTS DM @diamondhands0428 or @blazin69 for call! |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 30 September 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LUXURYCALLS101 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 34
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🧹🧹 Blair Witch ERC 🧹🧹 In 1999, the popular movie ‘’ the Blair witch project ‘’ took the world by storm. The realistic and terrifying movie scenes shall live in history forever. however, most wondered was the tale of the 3 student filmmakers who disappeared in the woods true ? 🧹666,666 supply 🧹5/5 taxes 🧹 dev is active and communicating via tg/twitter 🧹liquidity is locked for 6 months 🧹contract renounced 🔥🔥ON A JUI…
🧹🧹 Blair Witch ERC 🧹🧹 In 1999, the popular movie ‘’ the Blair witch project ‘’ took the world by storm. The realistic and terrifying movie scenes shall live in history forever. however, most wondered was the tale of the 3 student filmmakers who disappeared in the woods true ? 🧹666,666 supply 🧹5/5 taxes 🧹 dev is active and communicating via tg/twitter 🧹liquidity is locked for 6 months 🧹contract renounced Medium: h…
Only 290$ Mc
DragonGodinnu Safe team , Just launched community is active ,lock LP Telegram: https://t.me/DragonGodinnu https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x5737d9700bc0ffc4d082e8fe70343a805e731e34 NFA/DYOR
Go do it now!
If you haven’t already subbed
We almost at 800 members! Just 3 away
Just been busy growing out @Mushapeplays
Hey guys sorry I haven’t updated in a bit
Orange Tang Inu launched this week, on a dip right now. DONT KNOW THE DEV SO AS ALWAYS 🔥🔥 DYOR AND NFA 🔥🔥 Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xe1724230c952b3acd68156BceD31E873C08bfaF5 Liquidity locked 2 months, contract renounced. Experienced dev and team. CA: 0xe1724230c952b3acd68156BceD31E873C08bfaF5 TELEGRAM: https://t.me/OrangeTangInu WEBSITE: https://www.orangetanginu.net/
NFA! Jeets are out! Full send. Dev from what I heard previous project went to 2M . https://t.me/OrangeTangInu https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xe1724230c952b3acd68156bced31e873c08bfaf5 🔥🔥 AS ALWAYS DYOR AND NFA!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LUXURYCALLS101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 19
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 19
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@LUXURYCALLS101 named 19 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LUXURY CALLS 101” (@LUXURYCALLS101), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LUXURYCALLS101.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.