Channel
@LOSTLINE_01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003919974481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LOSTLINE_01 |
| Created | 7 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LOSTLINE_01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 13 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325651712080361443 | 9 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5390870232124388657 | 8 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5460804690683903256 | 7 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5462939959444912710 | 6 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5465174867152216391 | 6 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5251665999849069852 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5393451614843467174 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5427139920974067532 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5391349962791483884 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5427160712910749477 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| custom 5253678539919597271 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5434014810700263280 | 2 | 3.23% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
.👁😱 : 🔠ēཡ ང🔤۷٤۲ ¿ 🎀 🦋 ➿ 🔪➿ 🦋 New cover by.. li!! 🦋 ➿ 🔪➿ 🦋 あたし なにも なにも してない いいこ いいこ あたし いいこ これが これが せかい こわれてる の にんげんさま あたし なにも なにも してない いいこ いいこ あたし いいこ こわれてる の にんげんさま true soyeon? ye sirr! ✈️:t.me/LOSTLINE_01 tt:lostline_oi
custom 52516659998490698521custom 54629399594449127101custom 54651748671522163911
Sticker, posted without a caption
спасибо огромное за анон!
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔹nøn t👁mē`🌟 🦋 ➿ 🔪➿ 🦋 .w🕋.ckm🎀🎀 🔤i: закрыто .• . 🔤ittao: закрыто.•. 🥹🥹 #🌺 #anontime #💋 наш тгк 🤍
custom 53256517120803614433custom 53908702321243886572custom 53913499627914838842
Sticker, posted without a caption
ꊐꏿꂵꀤꊮꁅ ꌗꏿꏿꊮ
custom 52516659998490698522custom 53256517120803614432custom 54651748671522163912
Sticker, posted without a caption
. . . 🌟WĤ🔤Ţ ? ? ? 💊ăuðiti0n : ; . . . søőn 💤⟩› (30 sub). ⁉️
custom 53908702321243886573custom 53934516148434671743custom 54608046906839032563custom 54651748671522163913custom 52516659998490698522custom 53256517120803614432custom 54271399209740675322custom 54629399594449127102
Sticker, posted without a caption
.👁😱 : 🔠ēཡ ང🔤۷٤۲ ۹۲٥༥ཥ?¿ 🎀 🦋 ➿ 🔪➿ 🦋 ___𝒸ℴ𝓂𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓈ℴℴ𝓃..‹🎀 ፐይልናይዩ
custom 54608046906839032564custom 53908702321243886573custom 54271399209740675323custom 54629399594449127103custom 52536785399195972712custom 53256517120803614432custom 53913499627914838842custom 53934516148434671742
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LOSTLINE_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 730,067 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❯❯̸⃟ℒᎾᏕƬℒ¡ℕ℮” (@LOSTLINE_01), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LOSTLINE_01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.