@lolka2020 больше не является частью нашей команды.(Доступа к данному телеграму у него больше нету, и никогда не будет!) Извините, кого он успел обмануть, надеюсь на то были причины, верим что вернеться и всем оплатит
👍3

Channel
@LOLKA_NEWS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
331subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001522877979 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LOLKA_NEWS |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LOLKA_NEWS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 331 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 335 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 339 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 341 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 341 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2025 to 31 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LOLKA_NEWS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2025 to 31 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
@lolka2020 больше не является частью нашей команды.(Доступа к данному телеграму у него больше нету, и никогда не будет!) Извините, кого он успел обмануть, надеюсь на то были причины, верим что вернеться и всем оплатит
👍3
SCAM DIESEL t.me/diesel_birza t.me/youtube_verified @jasmin_verified SCAM На скриншотах все можете увидеть сами. Человек пустил канал, канал был живой более 2 суток (хотя гарантии даже по факту никакой нет и он был об этом предупрежден). Это уже не первый случай когда человек с большим траффиком устраивает подобную клоунаду. К слову долг который он отказывается оплатить - 160$. Стоит задуматься Переписку фул при…
Дополнительный скрин. (конец самой переписки)
так же добавить хочу что почти пол года назад скамнул на 800$
id: 1 378 348 465 Пишет, что хочет купить канал, договорился про цену и кидает хеш на оплату, но на самом деле он просто перевёл себе на другой кошелёк. Сразу удалил сообщения, как только я сказал, что транзакции нет. Пишет по-английски, якобы иностранец
👍1
LOLKA NEWS pinned Deleted message
id: 5 915 480 123 @f_guyi_bc пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
id: 6 642 328 295 @hunt3r774 пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
id: 7 738 582 624 @katanayt скам на 180 пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
id: 6 503 841 850 пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
id: 1 329 717 420 ех пойло пойло скок у тебя акков пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
id: 7 574 175 544 @saokin_mr пробивайте всегда id аккаунта , убирают или меняют юзернейм
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @LOLKA_NEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOLKA NEWS” (@LOLKA_NEWS), 331 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LOLKA_NEWS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.