LOA Official AirDrop Channel pinned «Should we start a new round of airdrop?»

Channel
LOA Official AirDrop Channel
@LOAofficialairdrop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
996subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001536874217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LOAofficialairdrop |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 1 January 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LOAofficialairdrop |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 996 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 999 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 1,001 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 1,002 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,003 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,003 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Should we start a new round of airdrop?
- YESSSSSS91%
- NOOOO9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Congratulation all AIRDROP reward has been paid!!!! Should we start a new round???
cheerssss
@Archytus0895 @HakanBuekmez @Sy_Muslih jracedera09 @poloman gambuloop shkin_0021 roeljayganet @arvandy999 kembal @pplasww @jacobcutie @ronaldocr7zzz aquisiolopw qmandubul @dreamsmitriy ErwinH_TV @edwardldr @H4ndr0id laproundomm pammanlop ozziqop Jerez Jhon @rokky31 @benmoshimoshi manuslop swop_000 @darknite00 @dos_akets @newplayer99 winner for airdrop 3.0 price will be send within 48 hours :)
On going still :)
LOA Official AirDrop Channel pinned «Hi guys!🚀 Airdrop 3.0, CM jun promised fast reward is here! ❗❗ 300usd to share among 30 winners🤑🤑!! ongoing for 48 hours 🕐 https://forms.gle/g3aSPzHLP4syo53Q9 3 task 1) Twitter retweet 2) coinmarketcap watchlist 3) twitch follow once done, write down…»
Hi guys!🚀 Airdrop 3.0, CM jun promised fast reward is here! ❗❗ 300usd to share among 30 winners🤑🤑!! ongoing for 48 hours 🕐 https://forms.gle/g3aSPzHLP4syo53Q9 3 task 1) Twitter retweet 2) coinmarketcap watchlist 3) twitch follow once done, write down username and upload it to the form! You can submit the form multiple time to increase your odds to win but please sure no repeat submission. But if we caught repea…
Airdrop 2.0 winners 10 winners is selected Will verify the submission, if it’s valid Will receive reward within 24 hours :) P4MES @loz_kiu @Batuyes Laxiumen @mrjovin @johmdel My Tia Lakuzmen @daiquang1981 Moretowinxx22
Airdrop is still on going
LOA Official AirDrop Channel pinned «Hi guys!🚀 Airdrop 2.0, CM jun promised fast reward is here! We know that's huge delay about our previous airdrop reward🙇🏼♂️ But fear not! I am here to promise you guys fast and quick reward once the airdrop is finished. Airdrop 2.0 starts today🥳🥳!!! First…»
Hi guys!🚀 Airdrop 2.0, CM jun promised fast reward is here! We know that's huge delay about our previous airdrop reward🙇🏼♂️ But fear not! I am here to promise you guys fast and quick reward once the airdrop is finished. Airdrop 2.0 starts today🥳🥳!!! First airdrop❗❗ 300usd to share among 10 winners🤑🤑!! ongoing for 48 hours 🕐 www.bit.ly/3HqJdzo 2 task 1) add 2 friends into our main TG 2) add 2 friends into LoA di…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LOAofficialairdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we start a new round of airdrop?
- YESSSSSS91%
- NOOOO9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2022 to 8 January 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 22
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 22
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@LOAofficialairdrop named 22 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOA Official AirDrop Channel” (@LOAofficialairdrop), 996 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LOAofficialairdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.