Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐‘ณ"๐‘ณ๐‘ฐ๐‘บ ๐‘บ๐‘ฏ๐‘ถ๐‘พ ~ ๐‘ถ๐‘ฐ

@LLIS_show

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

70subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160539866
TypeChannel
Username@LLIS_show
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LLIS_show

Growth

707 August 2026 โ€” 70 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 70 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 69โ€“71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:4770no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3970first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Videos
30

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20m 52s
Average length
2m 59s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6742.1%
๐Ÿ”ฅ1610.1%
๐Ÿ’…106.29%
๐Ÿ˜95.66%
๐Ÿ‘85.03%
๐Ÿ’˜85.03%
โค74.40%
๐Ÿฅฐ63.77%
โšก53.14%
๐ŸŽ‰53.14%
๐Ÿ’‹53.14%
โ˜ƒ42.52%
๐Ÿ“21.26%
๐ŸŽ„21.26%
๐Ÿ’”21.26%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ21.26%
๐Ÿคฏ10.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 2 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Feb 2025, 14:03 UTC370 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ะะต ะฟะธัˆะธั‚ะต ะฟะพะถะฐะปัƒะนัั‚ะฐ ะฒ ะฑะพั‚ะฐ. ะฃ ะผะตะฝั ะฝะตั‚ ะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฐ ะบ ั‚ะพะผัƒ ะฐะบะบะฐัƒะฝั‚ัƒ. ะฏ ะทะฝะฐัŽ ั‡ั‚ะพ ะบั‚ะพ-ั‚ะพ ะฟะธัะฐะป ั‚ัƒะดะฐ ะฟะพ ะฟะพะฒะพะดัƒ ะฝะฐะบั€ัƒั‚ะบะธ, ั‡ะฐัั‚ะพ ั‚ะฐะบ ะดะตะปะฐัŽั‚. ะขะฐะบ ั‡ั‚ะพ ะพั‚ะฟั€ะฐะฒัŒั‚ะต ัะบั€ะธะฝั‹ ะฒ ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ, ะฟะพะถะฐะปัƒะนัั‚ะฐ.

2 Feb 2025, 13:55 UTC367 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ะ—ะฐะฒั‚ั€ะฐ ะฟั€ะพะฒะตะดั‘ะผ ะตั‰ั‘ ะพะดะฝะพ ะณะพะปะพัะพะฒะฐะฝะธะต, ั‚ะพะปัŒะบะพ ัƒะถะต ั LunReal. ะ—ะฐะฒั‚ั€ะฐ ั‚ะฐะบะถะต ะฑัƒะดะตั‚ ะพะฟั€ะตะดะตะปั‘ะฝ ะฟะพะฑะตะดะธั‚ะตะปัŒ, ะธ ะฑัƒะดะตั‚ ัˆะฐะฝั ะฟะพะปัƒั‡ะธั‚ัŒ ะฒั‚ะพั€ะพัŽ ะฟะพะฑะตะดัƒ. ะกะตะณะพะดะฝั ัะปะธัˆะบะพะผ ะผะฝะพะณะพ ะฟั€ะพะธััˆะตัั‚ะฒะธะน, ะดัƒะผะฐัŽ ะผะฝะพะณะธะต ะฟะพะฝะธะผะฐัŽั‚ ะพ ั‡ั‘ะผ ั.

โค5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

2 Feb 2025, 10:12 UTC395 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ะŸะพ ะพัˆะธะฑะบะธ ัะดะตะปะฐะปะธ 2 ั€ะฐะทะฐ LOVESICK. ะŸั€ะตะดะปะฐะณะฐัŽ ะพัั‚ะฐะฝะพะฒะธั‚ัŒ ะณะพะปะพัะพะฒะฐะฝะธะต ะธ ะฝะฐั‡ะฐั‚ัŒ ะทะฐะฝะพะฒะพ, ะฒั‹ ัะพะณะปะฐัะฝั‹?

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ‘6

2 Feb 2025, 06:03 UTCโ‰ˆ1,230 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฅ ??

  1. ๐‘ต๐’€๐‘ฟ๐‘ฐ๐‘จ11%
  2. ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘จ18%
  3. ๐‘ฎ๐‘ถ๐‘ซ๐‘ซ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘บ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ3%
  4. ๐‘จ๐‘บ๐‘ป๐‘น๐‘จ๐‘ณ2%
  5. ๐‘ฑ๐‘ฐ๐‘ณ18%
  6. ๐‘ฏ๐‘จ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ ๐‘ด๐‘ฌ6%
  7. ๐‘ณ๐‘ถ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘ฐ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ1%
  8. ๐‘น:๐‘ฟ๐‘ฐ๐‘ต25%
  9. ๐‘จ๐‘ผ๐‘น๐‘ฌ๐‘ณ๐‘ณ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ6%
  10. ๐‘ณ๐‘ถ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘ฐ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿคฏ1

1 Feb 2025, 14:03 UTC269 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ’Ÿโ€ฆ #๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ ๐‘ท๐‘ฌ๐‘น๐‘ญ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘ต๐‘ช๐‘ฌ โ€ข๐‘จ๐‘บ๐‘ป๐‘น๐‘จ๐‘ณ - ๐‘‹๐‘‚ โŸจ artist: @astralasra โŸฉ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4โค1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

1 Feb 2025, 13:50 UTC483 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ’Ÿโ€ฆ #๐Ÿ— ๐‘ท๐‘ฌ๐‘น๐‘ญ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘ต๐‘ช๐‘ฌ โ€ข๐‘ฑ๐‘ฐ๐‘ณ - ๐ท๐ด๐‘๐บ๐ธ๐‘…๐‘‚๐‘ˆ๐‘†๐ฟ๐‘Œ โŸจ artist: @joyuri_krash โŸฉ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐ŸŽ‰5โ˜ƒ4๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ˜3๐ŸŽ„2๐Ÿ’…2๐Ÿ’‹2

1 Feb 2025, 13:40 UTC209 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ’Ÿโ€ฆ #๐Ÿ– ๐‘ท๐‘ฌ๐‘น๐‘ญ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ด๐‘จ๐‘ต๐‘ช๐‘ฌ โ€ข๐‘จ๐‘ผ๐‘น๐‘ฌ๐‘ณ๐‘ณ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ - ๐‘Š๐ป๐ผ๐‘†๐‘‡๐ฟ๐ธ โŸจ artist: @aurellesoi โŸฉ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ˜ฑ2๐Ÿ’…1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LLIS_show. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Feb 2025, 06:03 UTCFinal Results249 voters

๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฅ ??

  1. ๐‘ต๐’€๐‘ฟ๐‘ฐ๐‘จ11%
  2. ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘จ18%
  3. ๐‘ฎ๐‘ถ๐‘ซ๐‘ซ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘บ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ3%
  4. ๐‘จ๐‘บ๐‘ป๐‘น๐‘จ๐‘ณ2%
  5. ๐‘ฑ๐‘ฐ๐‘ณ18%
  6. ๐‘ฏ๐‘จ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ ๐‘ด๐‘ฌ6%
  7. ๐‘ณ๐‘ถ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘ฐ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ1%
  8. ๐‘น:๐‘ฟ๐‘ฐ๐‘ต25%
  9. ๐‘จ๐‘ผ๐‘น๐‘ฌ๐‘ณ๐‘ณ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ6%
  10. ๐‘ณ๐‘ถ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฌ๐‘บ๐‘ฐ๐‘ช๐‘ฒ9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 2 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘ณ"๐‘ณ๐‘ฐ๐‘บ ๐‘บ๐‘ฏ๐‘ถ๐‘พ ~ ๐‘ถ๐‘ฐโ€ (@LLIS_show), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LLIS_show.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.