14 Apr 2026, 09:58 UTC116 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Канал по рекламе ботов поддержки и общения https://t.me/Liklastup
🍌2
Signed Свага
Channel
ЛклЕ | Проверка ботов поддержки
@LKLEPROVERK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003878997335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LKLEPROVERK |
| Description | Проверяем боты поддержки, на запрет проверок похуй, что нам скидывают то и проверяем. Наша Сфера относится к Ликлас! наши каналы: https://t.me/LIKLASDRTY https://t.me/+otphR4AI65RjZGUy https://t.me/LIKLAS0 по вопросам в сообщения каналу (они бесплатные) |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 9 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LKLEPROVERK |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 14 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 17
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 17.6% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
12 Apr 2026, 14:36 UTC125 viewsread 12 August 2026
Наш бот поддержки и общения @Mekpoppopop_bot Так же ищем туда админов писать в коммы
Signed Свага
12 Apr 2026, 08:02 UTC127 viewsread 12 August 2026
Просьба подписаться на самое главное инфо всего ликласа (https://t.me/+-ZpEPa0Q8uM4M2Yy)
Signed Свага
12 Apr 2026, 04:24 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Христос Воскресе
🌚2💯1🤣1
Signed Свага
11 Apr 2026, 11:40 UTC117 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
• наш канал по интервью
💯1
Signed Свага
11 Apr 2026, 09:26 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
| bot verification @krovavoe_ozero_bot | Проверяла бот #Розэ Админ #Райвель . Долго отвечает, но поддерживает согласно законам, если проблема повязана с чем то незаконным. Поддерживает, помогает с физическими травмами, по вопросам что делать с ранами. Оформление очень кстати и прикольное, за что плюс боту. Итог: Бот хороший, админ хороший, про других не знаю Бот: 9/10
💋3
11 Apr 2026, 08:17 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
bot verification @light_of_distantplanets_bot проверяла бот #свага Я общалась с админом #грешная Отличная поддержка, быстро ответили впрочем 10/10, хорошее приветствие. В инфо нет ничего лишнего, есть интерактивы от админов. Хотелось бы уточнить что данный админ #грешная является владельцем и её поддержка достойна вести целый бот. Итог: Советую бота, как по общению точно не знаю, но вот поддержка явно стоит того. …
❤2💯2
11 Apr 2026, 08:08 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Ждёте проверки? сегодня будет много
🍓2
9 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC113 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Пиздец, а не бот знаки препинания, алооо? Админ #тьма их потеряла. как вы поняли, это bot verification @Sunset_help_bot Проверяла бот #свага Бот хуйня, еще давно переписывалась с админом #ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱss (она была лучше, но не сильно) Поддержка отсутствие, «оу мне жаль тебя» «это грустно» кстати #тьма это влд бота (вроде как). Я упоротая или че? как такая безграмотность и неумение поддерживать вообще может браться за сферу …
🍓4❤3⚡2
9 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC82 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Пиздец, а не бот знаки препинания, алооо? Админ #тьма их потеряла. как вы поняли, это bot verification Бот хуйня, еще давно переписывалась с админом #ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱss (она была лучше, но не сильно) Поддержка отсутствие, «оу мне жаль тебя» «это грустно» кстати #тьма это влд бота. Я упоротая или че? как такая безграмотность и неумение поддерживать вообще может браться за сферу ботов ПОДДЕРЖКИ БЛЯТЬ. Короче хуйня собачья, на скр…
9 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Как же я хочу проверить реально нормальный бот, одни долбаёбы за ботами сидят в последнее время
💅2
9 Apr 2026, 12:58 UTC76 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
bot verification @archanlele_bot я общалась с админом #мира в конце подключилась #᧘ᥙ᧘ᥙ Ну короче ебейший бот, я общалась с админом по общению, впрочем не плохо вопросов нет, единственное нет тем для разговора, хотя у качественного и хорошего админа должны они быть (говорю как бывший владелец 7 ботов поддержки). Админ: 8/10, как раз таки за то что не знает о чем поговорить. #мира задавала дохуя вопросов которые по сут…
❤2🤡2⚡1🍌1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LKLEPROVERK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,022,533 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛклЕ | Проверка ботов поддержки” (@LKLEPROVERK), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LKLEPROVERK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.