Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📣北·中·南辣妹客評Gleezy:ymx379 賴896mr

Channel

📣北·中·南辣妹客評Gleezy:ymx379 賴896mr

@LINE1uk668

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

987subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001544787930
TypeChannel
Username@LINE1uk668
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LINE1uk668

Growth

987994990.57 August 2026 — 992 subscribers7 August 2026 — 991 subscribers14 August 2026 — 993 subscribers20 August 2026 — 994 subscribers26 August 2026 — 987 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 986–995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 22:43987-7
20 Aug 2026, 15:11994+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:58993+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:41991-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:47992first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.81%
avg views ÷ 987 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.8
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held5 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total484
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC123 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

差點錯過了 本來打算只玩一節的你 看到妹妹直接玩20000兩節 太刺激啦 兩個小時的床戰 辛苦啦 幸福啦 哈哈哈 妹妹還沒到就想打聽台北 高雄的小模正妹 超級期待下次給你安排更不一樣的體驗哦 ❤️ 藝名:琳琳 資料:158cm 45kg Dcup 20歲 暑假報班系 超級可愛 童顏巨乳 【#南部】 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 🔜 約妹群組導航站🔙 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 📱沐玄LINE:896mr ✈️約妹私密 :@facan258 ⭐Gleezy🆔:ymx379 🚨【新手外約小知識】 🍵【正妹班表專區】 📝【北中南客評】 👼【沐心情小黑屋】 🔞【成人轟趴外流群】 🔞【老司機網美淫濕】 🎁【簽到福利群】 🚗全臺灣老司機黑暗總站入口✈️ 🥰【一鍵解鎖更多老司機群】🥰 🔗茶坊論壇: www.alin123.com/ ⭐約妹私沐玄:https://gleezy.net/ymx379 ⭐妹妹報班群:https://c.g

5 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC99 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

開門紅 給自己也放鬆了 特推氣質人妻 哥哥們有興趣可以私信沐玄哦 藝名:慧慧 資料:165cm47kgCcup27歲 服務項目:愛愛 親親 LG 69 按摩 特征:高挑 皮膚白嫩 光滑 氣質 大眼 個性健談 會勾引人哦 #服務評價:很不錯 好評 雖然很簡單 但是能感受到你在這兩節的時間裡 體驗到不一樣的服務 跟妹妹互動過程的快樂 不是每個人都能言善語 更多是身體上的放鬆感受不一樣的快樂 【#南部】 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 🔜 約妹群組導航站🔙 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 📱沐玄LINE:896mr ✈️約妹私密 :@facan258 ⭐Gleezy🆔:ymx379 🚨【新手外約小知識】 🍵【正妹班表專區】 📝【北中南客評】 👼【沐心情小黑屋】 🔞【成人轟趴外流群】 🔞【老司機網美淫濕】 🎁【簽到福利群】 🚗全臺灣老司機黑暗總站入口✈️ 🥰【一鍵解鎖更多老司機群】🥰 🔗茶坊論壇: www.alin123.com/

31 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ymx127Photo

好可愛 好好玩開心吧 謝謝你月底最後一天來捧場😘

31 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC60 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

今日單親媽媽被解鎖啦 價位便宜 又氣質 服務超級無敵騷哦 很適合新手 跟喜歡服務型的哥哥們 藝名:子欣 資料:167cm 47kg Ccup 28歲 服務:愛愛 親親 69 LG 口爆 上搖 BJ 無套吹······ 特價:$6000 【#南部】 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 🔜 約妹群組導航站🔙 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 📱沐玄LINE:896mr ✈️約妹私密 :@facan258 ⭐Gleezy🆔:ymx379 🚨【新手外約小知識】 🍵【正妹班表專區】 📝【北中南客評】 👼【沐心情小黑屋】 🔞【成人轟趴外流群】 🔞【老司機網美淫濕】 🎁【簽到福利群】 🚗全臺灣老司機黑暗總站入口✈️ 🥰【一鍵解鎖更多老司機群】🥰 🔗茶坊論壇: www.alin123.com/ ⭐約妹私沐玄:https://gleezy.net/ymx379 ⭐妹妹報班群:https://c.gleezy.top/TWbb888 ⭐高端妹妹群:h

30 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

服務主動 慾望強的妹妹 喜歡的人多嗎哈哈哈 想體驗被妹妹榨乾的感覺嗎 今日南部就來了一個特價妹哦 藝名:馨馨 身高:162 罩杯:46 罩杯:D 年齡:23-24歲 #服務評價: 馨馨服務真的很不錯 主動 會撩 純天然真乃 很挺 經常做包養 奶頭都是粉粉的 皮膚白嫩 真的很性感哦 建議妹妹不要那麼騷 喜歡清純的客人慎點😂 【#南部】 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 🔜 約妹群組導航站🔙 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 📱沐玄LINE:896mr ✈️約妹私密 :@facan258 ⭐Gleezy🆔:ymx379 🚨【新手外約小知識】 🍵【正妹班表專區】 📝【北中南客評】 👼【沐心情小黑屋】 🔞【成人轟趴外流群】 🔞【老司機網美淫濕】 🎁【簽到福利群】 🚗全臺灣老司機黑暗總站入口✈️ 🥰【一鍵解鎖更多老司機群】🥰 🔗茶坊論壇: www.alin123.com/ ⭐約妹私沐玄:https://gleezy.net/ymx379

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @LINE1uk668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 120,356 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📣北·中·南辣妹客評Gleezy:ymx379 賴896mr” (@LINE1uk668), 987 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LINE1uk668.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.