Channel name was changed to «Yi Sang - Student pointilist-Rest»

Channel
Yi Sang - Student pointilist-Rest
@LCgramYISangPointilist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003611228043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LCgramYISangPointilist |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LCgramYISangPointilist |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 26 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 104.8%
- avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 27.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.76%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 109 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
────────── · · • «Наши жизни — лишь отдельные точки, сливающиеся в единую грусть только издалека». ・°・———–—––❀°• :point: •°❀—–——–—・°・ ⚫️ - Слёзы воска текут ручьём от яркого и тёплого пламени свечи во тьме ночной. Звучит весьма романтично, не так ли? Но, честно говоря, использование данных свечей ➖ весьма любопытный способ придать картинам новый свет. 🖌 Тепло свечи дарует новый взгляд как на произведения, так …
Скоро будет переоформление...
👍1
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Несмотря на мое широкое понимание мира, обретенное с приходом в искусство, одного мне понять не дается: как люди, ведомые лживой силой и молящиеся на слова «плоть слаба, а машины бессмертны», способны променять прекрасное человеческое тело на холодную сталь металла? Каким бы сильным ни казался металл, ему не удастся стать таким же гибким и универсальным, как прекрасное, подобное ц…
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Я рад, что вам так понравилось, мисс Фауст... Моя чаша тоже полна прекрасным чаем, который успокаивает душу и наполняет мой разум полем цветов разных идей. Разве это не замечательно? Возможно, нам стоит устраивать вечера, подобные этому, почаще. ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - О пламя, что приносит в наши дома уют и тепло, греет нашу еду и сжигает тела наших врагов! Но это лишь одна сторона медали; другая же способна погубить нас самих, наше имущество и духовные ценности - всё, что нам дорого. Всё может сгореть в геенне огненной и никогда не вернуться. А всепоглощающий, темный как смоль дым заставляет всех разбегаться в панике, оставляя за собой вместе …
- Ты хороший. На полке два пирожка. Твой – посередине ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Чего же вы ожидаете от меня? Пусть я и приму сию похвалу, взяв изделие. Но почему именно посередине? Разве столь важен порядок пирожков? ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
💋1
- А что было такого замечательного? ✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Пусть мое желание распространяться о своей личной жизни и прошлом невелико, но тот день был прекрасен, как весеннее солнышко. Тогда я еще создавал посредственное искусство, пытаясь найти истинную точность. В один прекрасный день я добился успехов: меня смогли оценить по достоинству и пригласили на красную дорожку к доценту. В тот самый день мне…
🍓1
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Мисс Фауст, ваши упрёки милы как всегда. Но первый разлив делается лишь для аромата... - Переходя в чистый зал. Что же, зал и вправду более эстетичный, и для вас второй разлив создан для души и вкуса. Пробуйте быстрее, пока не остыл! Какой прекрасный вкус, мягкий аромат... ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - На удивление, всё в более-менее приличном состоянии. Чувствуете ли вы это, мисс Фауст? Как столь приятный запах разносится по столь гнилому месту — столь сладкий запах белого чая? Нежный, светлый. Пусть кружки не столь приглядны, но главное - их содержимое. ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Сколь бы ни были радужны мои надежды, мисс Фауст, я все еще хочу удостовериться в работоспособности чайника и плиты. Даже при наличии воды нам стоит ее прокипятить. ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
✎﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ - Давайте, это была бы замечательная идея. Надеюсь она потечет как неогарский водопад. ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LCgramYISangPointilist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,083,018 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yi Sang - Student pointilist-Rest” (@LCgramYISangPointilist), 26 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LCgramYISangPointilist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.