30 Apr 2026, 02:59 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
Channel
Lancaster County Republicans
@LCRPNE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001666321887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LCRPNE |
| Description | The previously official Telegram feed of the Lancaster County Republican Party of Nebraska. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LCRPNE |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 54 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 89
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 24
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 32s
- Average length
- 2m 46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
13 Mar 2026, 03:30 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
25 Oct 2025, 02:22 UTC77 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
“Not Connected to the Internet” — The Greatest Election Lie Ever Told For years, Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen and county election officials have repeated the same rehearsed line whenever questions about our voting machines arise: “They’re not connected to the internet.” But contracts, network documentation, and federal partnerships reveal a very different reality. What officials call “not connected” is l…
25 Oct 2025, 02:22 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) — and neither are CrowdStrike’s Falcon endpoint tools or the Cradlepoint routers embedded in county tabulation networks. 🔗 https://www.essvote.om/blog/our-customers/award-for-election-innovation-nased/ Worse still, Cradlepoint routers are made in China, shipped to Taiwan for relabeling, and then repackaged on U.S.-flagged ships to skirt FISMA import rules. These routers sit insi…
25 Sept 2025, 21:58 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Bob Evnen failed to produce the requested records.
24 Sept 2025, 02:38 UTC211 viewsread 10 August 2026
Bob Evnen: Dodging Transparency at Every Turn When Nebraskans entrusted Bob Evnen with overseeing the state’s elections, they expected integrity, transparency, and accountability. Instead, what they’ve received is a masterclass in stonewalling, secrecy, and rogue behavior. The pattern is undeniable. 1. The Rogue Kenya MOU Earlier this year, Evnen signed a backroom memorandum of understanding with Kenya’s governme…
24 Sept 2025, 02:38 UTC142 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
26 Aug 2025, 05:19 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectionEducationPhoto
Here is a quick list of how banning mail in ballots would impact states that are 100% mail in, as well as states that allow some form of mail in voting.
26 Aug 2025, 05:19 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectionFraud20_org
Mail-in Ballots Erica has put together a great diagram illustrating everything that can go wrong with ballot harvesting. (Find more diagrams by Erica on her channel "Election Education Materials". She also created a mail-in ballot board game to educate people about the perils of mail-in voting). - Mail-in voting encourages threats, coercion, bribery and facilitates the erosion of privacy (which seems to be a majo…
26 Aug 2025, 05:18 UTC35 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @KanekoaTheGreatPhoto
Putin: "The previous U.S. elections were rigged through mail voting." "They bought ballots for $10, filled them in, and without any supervision from observers, they threw them into mailboxes." In 2005, the Federal Election Reform Commission, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter, concluded, "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud." In 2012, the NYT wrote, "All the evidence of stolen…
26 Aug 2025, 04:03 UTC198 viewsread 10 August 2026
Bob Evnen’s Pattern of Secrecy: From Silenced Ethics Complaints to Election Cover-Ups Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen wants voters to believe he’s the guardian of “gold standard” elections. But the truth paints a very different picture. From secret deals and buried ethics complaints to stonewalling public records requests and misleading the public about ballot counting, Evnen has established a disturbing patte…
25 Aug 2025, 14:26 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @LCRPNE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lancaster County Republicans” (@LCRPNE), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LCRPNE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.