Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LCL Calls

@LCLcalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001948303938
TypeChannel
Username@LCLcalls
DescriptionYou can join our lounge community here: https://t.me/LegitCryptoLounge
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LCLcalls

Growth

317 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:0131no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2831first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
5
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3973.6%
917.0%
🤣23.77%
🫡23.77%
🤔11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2024 to 22 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2024, 19:25 UTC260 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Meet the @KiloRaidBot 🤖 The Kilo Raid bot can be utilised to help communities raid on X. You might have seen similar utility, but this comes with a difference… TheKiloDAO.ton will be buying projects using the bot with a % of revenue. The rest of revenue will go back towards KILO and its holders. Overtime the investments will be used to build TheKiloDAO.ton as well as dispersing airdrops to $KILO holders. In a nut

🔥2

13 May 2024, 10:37 UTC195 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Sup guys. I’m building out a TON specific channel. Which I plan to make very TON noob friendly. If TON is something your interested I’ll be sharing lots of early opportunities, latest initiatives from TON foundation, KILO updates over here. https://t.me/TobysTonJournal I appreciate anyone who subs 🫡 Should have a couple of good launches this week 👀

🔥5

7 May 2024, 20:33 UTC193 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Long time community member @Josh_number1 launched a project on TON. Safe play. Around $52k. New launch and you know it’s safe, quite volatile so find an entry. Would have called launch but I’ve been super busy 🤦‍♂️ show Josh some support! https://t.me/captainwhaleportal Sticker meta on telegram. Good narrative with stickers and whales. https://www.geckoterminal.com/ton/pools/EQDd9C7aEJE6gFMLzIyUAu_tDe70w6FocNIK6

🔥5

7 May 2024, 19:31 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Good evening guys 🫡 We had the alpha test of the Compbot here in $KILO. But we want to give a shout out to @TheCoinOnTon for being our Beta testers! Bullish sticker meta project with some bullish links to a big ETH project 👀 First project to use the bot and they are running a HUGE buy competition using our tech! Go check it out in action! More updates coming soon and then the rollout begins 💪

🔥4

4 May 2024, 20:58 UTC145 viewsread 11 August 2026

Alright, well there was a chance for 4x even though it was broken 🤣 LP looks like it was added wrong. Not much he can do to fix it really. Burning the 70% won’t fix the ratio. There’s a bit left in the LP pool and dev won’t profit from it. Not sure what his plans are next. But if you lost on it, drop me a DM.

4 May 2024, 18:54 UTC134 viewsread 11 August 2026

I think he did something wrong with LP by mistake. Not sure what, but I’ll dig through in a minute

4 May 2024, 18:28 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Wait on this… it’s safe dev, but I need to check something Trying to put the kids to bed at the same time 🤦‍♂️

🤣2🔥1

4 May 2024, 17:59 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Safe play on TON $20k https://t.me/captainwhaleton EQAfRwpThz8Ru9zn6F21q6vd_qvft1q9FqCboHpuYtctXhtU Don’t buy it, liquidity was added incorrect.

🔥2

30 Apr 2024, 23:20 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

The first competition bot on $TON… Still loads of games / modes we want to add but Utility bot 2 is under development!

3🔥2

30 Apr 2024, 23:19 UTC122 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

🚨Kilogram New Buy🚨 🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾🦾 💰Spent: 46.547775247 TON 🧳Bought: 1.05 KILO 📊Competition Spot: 3 💎Wallet: EQCz86...lPoFhW Leading Buys: 🥇80 TON - EQCiiZ...4bG42m 🥈50 TON - EQDHRe...a7etaO 🥉46.547775247 TON - EQCz86...lPoFhW Buy competition end at 46 hours: 15 minutes: 59 sec

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LCLcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LCL Calls” (@LCLcalls), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LCLcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.