Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Secret Channel

@LBTGFSTL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

324subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002339237909
TypeChannel
Username@LBTGFSTL
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LBTGFSTL

Growth

3247 Aug 2026, 15:36 — 324 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:20 — 324 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:368 Aug 2026, 07:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 323–325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:20324no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:36324first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
15
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5458876722814425424631.6%
🍓526.3%
421.1%
custom 5764864628366514096210.5%
custom 578278236004706499315.26%
custom 604170537831445785715.26%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LBTGFSTL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 14:52 UTC294 views0 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

💎 Toncoin → Gram The rebranding is in progress 🔥

Signed ꘜ Bardia

9 Jun 2026, 19:37 UTC344 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

⌚️ A fully native Telegram app for Apple Watch is out.

Signed ꘜ Bardia

1 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC343 viewsread 8 August 2026

💎 TON’s native currency is becoming Gram. 🤑 Gram was the original name of TON’s currency in the first white paper. 🌱 We’re returning to our roots — and starting a new chapter. ✈️ This rebranding will pave the way for what comes next. ⏳ The transition will take around 3 weeks. 💪 TON remains the name of the blockchain. 🪙 This is step 4 of 7 to Make TON Great Again.

Signed ꘜ Bardia

27 May 2026, 14:10 UTC337 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/telegram/status/2059635739566932202?s=46

Signed ꘜ Bardia

26 May 2026, 18:08 UTC288 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @netblocksPhoto

🫶 Welcome back #Iran! Metrics show a further rise in connectivity as mobile networks and other segments are reconnected to the global internet: • Filternet remains in place but can be worked around • WhatsApp now restricted, requiring circumvention • Some users still offline

1🍓1

Signed ꘜ Bardia

18 May 2026, 14:39 UTC408 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Ton.org is now live 👀 #MTONGA

🍓3

Signed ꘜ Bardia

13 May 2026, 05:24 UTC521 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🧱 Giveaway Finished 🧱 Total tickets: 46580 Winners list: 1. Chill Flame #27361 - @axify063735

3custom 54588767228144254242🍓1custom 60417053783144578571

Signed MRKT

11 May 2026, 19:41 UTC357 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

👑 Pavel Durov just highlighted another major step for TON’s ecosystem ✈️ This time the focus is developers — making it much easier and faster to build on TON. ⚙️ What is Acton? Acton is TON’s new developer tool that simplifies smart contract creation. Instead of using multiple separate tools, developers can now build, test, and deploy everything in one smoother workflow. 🤖 Biggest part: it’s AI-ready. That mean

Signed ꘜ Bardia

11 May 2026, 17:03 UTC244 views1 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🚪 Portals just removed buy/sell fees on Telegram Gifts 0% fees now. 🔥 Looks like the competition for the gift market is heating up. #MGGA #MTONGA #PORTALS

custom 54588767228144254241

Signed ꘜ Bardia

11 May 2026, 13:54 UTC208 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏴‍☠️Fragment just made things easier 🪙You can now buy Telegram Premium and Stars directly with USDT. No extra steps, no need to convert first — straight payment. Small update… but huge for TON / Telegram ecosystem adoption. #Fragment #MTONGA

Signed ꘜ Bardia

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LBTGFSTL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 465,718 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Secret Channel” (@LBTGFSTL), 324 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LBTGFSTL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.