Channel
@LBPconf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
128subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001934351352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LBPconf |
| Created | 7 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LBPconf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 128 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 130 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
222 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 36.9% | |
| 💘 | 32 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 9.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 8.11% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 6.76% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 5.41% | |
| 😨 | 10 | 4.50% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 4.05% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.15% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.15% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 2.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.901% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.45% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.45% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 14 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
привееттт!!! очень люблю лбп!! познакомился с ним, когда мне в 2019 году брали третью плойку и к ней шла вторая часть лбп. мне оочеень зашла игруля, прошел еще какое-то дополнение к ней, которая играется через мувы, с сеттингом каменного века. потом мне мама взяла третью часть, ибо видела, как мне зашла игра :D но пройти до конца я ее так и не смог, ибо при загрузке на уровень приставка полностью зависает и ей …
💘24❤7❤🔥5👍1
Мяммямямямямя я скачал лбп 😈😈 неанон зико #тейк / Lbp_conf_bot
❤22❤🔥5🔥4💘1🥰1😁1
а лбп3 на пс4 работает??? #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
👍3
у меня есть вопрос, как вы познакомились с франшизой Литтл Биг Плэнэт? я вот про этих вязаных няшек узнал через вроде как Диллерона... или может через канал Копилки с играми... не анон Руслан(aka Pseudos) #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
🔥11❤1
🪮: тейки?? /бездавл #щп / @Lbp_conf_bot
зацените чо откапал) у меня еще диск лбп где то валяется, буду кайфовать неанон зико #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
🎉8❤5💘3❤🔥1🔥1
Я В ТРИХУЕ РУФД ЛБП СУЩЕСТВУЕТ 🪮:живём как можем #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
😁6❤4💘1
что такое литл биг планет, увидел вашу конфу в другой и меня это заинтересовало #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
❤4
признавайтесь кто хочет так же #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
❤19💊5🔥2💘1
какой ваш любимый уровень в лбп3???? я обожаю уровни тогла, свупа и одсока!! особенно тогла... и еще если взять из гнилевуда я обожаю уровень, где мы наполняем генератор коктейлями.... там просто гениальное музыкальное сопровождение и в целом стилистика уровня #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
❤7
хочу рассказать свою историю не взаимной любви с лбп💔 я часто зависал вместе со своим троюродным старшим братом, у нас разница всего в один год, и вот, однажды он показал мне эту игру я был в восторге настолько, что помню её спустя годы и вот, мы играли с ним вместе время от времени, как вдруг в один момент перестали общаться из-за того что мой дядя развёлся с его мамой именно поэтому он со мной больше не здорова…
😢7💘1
самый недооцененный персонаж франшизы по вашему мнению #тейк / @Lbp_conf_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LBPconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,012,268 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LBPconf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Little Big Planet Confession” (@LBPconf), 128 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LBPconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.