Channel
@LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
87,223subscribers
-396 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001964172126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 87,223 | -73 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 87,296 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 87,282 | -63 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 87,345 | -114 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 87,459 | -86 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 87,545 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 87,558 | -80 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 87,638 | +78 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 87,560 | -59 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 87,619 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (4 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,658 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 आप सभी की तैयारी के लिए मैं अपनी तरफ़ से जितनी मदद कर सकता हूँ, करने की कोशिश करता हूँ — Books, Batches, Daily Current Affairs और भी बहुत कुछ। 📖 🤩 अब बदले में आपसे बस छोटी-सी मदद चाहिए ? अगर आपको हमारा App पसंद आ रहा है तो प्लीज़ App पर जाकर हमें 5 ⭐️ Rating दे दीजिए। आपकी एक Rating हमारे लिए बहुत बड़ी Motivation है। ❣️ 🤩 App Link ⬇️ ️ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.oaxwje.bryhfg
Latest PDF Books Telegram Channel में सभी टीचर के Paid Books फ्री में मिलेंगे, इसलिए सभी स्टूडेंट इस चैनल को जरूर ज्वॉइन करें। ✅👇
* ✅️ आपका कौन सा विषय कमजोर है.✍️ *
𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐘𝐐𝐬 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝗔𝗯𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘃 𝗦𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗸 1. अखिल भारतीय सेवाओं का सृजन राज्यसभा द्वारा किया जाता है। The creation of All India Services is done by the Rajya Sabha. 2. सबसे भारी धातु ओसमियम है। The heaviest metal is Osmium. 3. विश्व का सबसे बड़ा महाकाव्य महाभारत है। The largest epic in the world is the Mahabharata. 4. आसियान संगठन की स्थापना 8 अगस्त 1967 को हुई थी। ASEAN was established on 8 August 1967. …
Daily Live Mock Test Series is Free Now 👇👇 https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book
🔺 11000+ प्रश्नों के Set दे रहे है बिलकुल फ्री, और अभी तक आप सो रहे हो,मौका जाने वाला है, 🎯 जल्दी ज्वाइन करें..... 🔥 [☞ 𝗝𝗢𝗜𝗡➠ यहाँ पर Click करें ☞ 𝗝𝗢𝗜𝗡➠ यहाँ पर Click करे](https://t.me/+X6TmFi8Dd9E2ZjU1)
Aap kya ho ?
👆👆 Quiz is Live....
Daily Live Mock Test Series is Free Now 👇👇 https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book
𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐏𝐘𝐐𝐬 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝗔𝗯𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘃 𝗦𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗸 1. दसवीं पंचवर्षीय योजना 1 अप्रैल 2002 को प्रारम्भ की गई। The Tenth Five-Year Plan was started on 1 April 2002. 2. जहाँगीर के दरबार का सबसे प्रमुख चित्रकार उस्ताद मंसूर था। The most prominent painter in Jahangir’s court was Ustad Mansur. 3. भारत में चल न्यायालय (Mobile Court) सर्वप्रथम हरियाणा में स्थापित किया गया। The first Mobile Court in India was established in …
🔖 Lucent पढ़ो, लेकिन सिर्फ पढ़ना काफी नहीं! 🔥 😵 अब हर Chapter का Test लगाओ और अपनी तैयारी परखो! 🚀 Lucent’s Chapterwise Test Series — Hamari Taiyari Official App पर! 💪 पढ़ो → Test लगाओ → Performance सुधारो → Selection पाओ! 🔥 ₹499 की Test Series अब सिर्फ ₹99 में! 📲 अभी App Download करो और Practice शुरू करो!👇👇 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.oaxwje.bryhfg
Daily Live Mock Test Series is Free Now 👇👇 https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book https://t.me/Apna_PDF_Book
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 570,220 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Law AIBE Judiciary PDF CLAT Exams” (@LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam), 87,223 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LAW_AIBE_Judiciary_PDF_CLAT_Exam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.