Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لحظه حال

Channel

لحظه حال

@LAHZEHAL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,097subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001040938223
TypeChannel
Username@LAHZEHAL
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LAHZEHAL

Growth

7,0957,1067,100.55 August 2026 — 7,098 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,098 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,106 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,095 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,100 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,097 subscribers7,0975 August 202625 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,093–7,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 16:387,097-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:087,099-1
19 Aug 2026, 14:037,100+5
12 Aug 2026, 08:167,095-11
9 Aug 2026, 00:567,106+8
6 Aug 2026, 03:167,098no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:487,098first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 7,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held24 (6 June 202618 August 2026)
Views total12,968
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 05s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

384 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35091.1%
👍174.43%
🔥123.13%
🥰30.781%
👎20.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC221 viewsread 18 August 2026

برگزاری مراقبه گروهی ، تنفسی ، جهت پاکسازی انرژی های منفی. امشب ، ساعت 23 برگزار میشود. جهت شرکت ، در یک مکان کاملا راحت و امن باشید ، تا به راحتی بتونید تمرینات تنفسی رو همزمان با هم انجام بدیم. این جلسه در فری کنفرانس برگزار میشه، حتما اینترنت شما اوکی باشه. لطفا اطلاع رسانی کنید. لینک ورود به اتاق جلسه👇🏼👇🏼 https://join.freeconferencecall.com/mohamadrostamii

Signed Mohamad‌ rostami

17 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC527 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ﺍﮐﻨﻮﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﯿﺮﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﯾﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﯼ ! ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﯼ ﻫﻤﻪ ﯼ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﯽ ﺗﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ... ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﯾﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺮ، ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩ ! @LAHZEHAL

21

Signed Mohamad‌ rostami

8 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,470 views42 reactionsread 20 August 2026

از هیچ چیز نباید ترسید، زیرا چیزی نداریم که از دست بدهیم. هرچه را که بتوان از شما ربود ، فاقد ارزش است، پس چرا باید ترسید. سارقین واقعی این ها هستند: تردید ، ظن ، ترس، آنها امکان شاد بودن را نابود میکنند. @LAHZEHAL

31👍11

6 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,720 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

@LAHZEHAL هر انسانی حقیقتی را با خود بدنیا می آورد.هر انسانی پیامبر خداست، نه فقط مسیح،بودا،یا زرتشت.اینان میدانند که پیامبر خدایند,اما دیگران نمیدانند. لحظه ای که بدنیا می آیی حقیقتی را در وجودت به همراه می آوری و تا زمانی که این حقیقت را ابراز نکنی خرسند نخواهی شد. تا زمانی که پیام خود را به جهان نرسانی عمیقا احساس ناراحتی خواهی کرد, زیرا دینت را به هستی ادا نکردی. تو باید آواز قلبت را سردهی. باید رقص خود را اجرا

22

3 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,420 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

مدیتیشن گشایش قلب 🤍 جوشش عشق درونی🕊️ با هندزفری تجربه نمایید 🎧 @mehdiowliaie

5

2 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,760 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

کسی که مي ترسدحلاوت عشق را نميچشد. کسی که عشق را تجربه نکند،زندگی را تجربه نکرده است. کسی که عشق را تجربه نکند همه گنجهای دنیا برایش سودی نخواهد داشت. 📗 #کتاب_زبان_فرشتگان Osho @LAHZEHAL

14👎2

29 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 20 August 2026

لینک گروه مدیتیشن👇🏼 https://t.me/+b8mxPLzpk4MwMTY8

27 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,020 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026

@LAHZEHAL #اعتماد زندگی ات را برای آنچه قرار است از دست برود تلف نکن.به زندگی اعتماد داشته باش. تنها اگر اعتماد کنی، تنها در آن موقع است که میتوانی دانش ات را کنار بگذاری. تنها در آن موقع است که میتوانی ذهن را کنار بگذاری. و با اعتماد پهنه عظیمی گشوده میشود، در آن زمان این زندگی دیگر زندگی معمولی نیست، زندگی از وجود خداوند سرشار و لبریز میشود. وقتی قلبت معصوم باشد و دیوارها از بین رفته باشند، به بی نهایت وصل میشوی و

18

20 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,850 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

مدیتیشن رهایی و توکل به خداوند با هندزفری تجربه کنید 🕊️ 1405/4/29 @mehdiowliaie

4👍1

19 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC≈7,970 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

اینستاگرام 👇 https://instagram.com/mohamad_rostammii @LAHZEHAL

14👍1

12 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC≈2,300 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

مدیتیشن ارتباط با خداوند 🧘‍♀ @mehdiowliaie 👇

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @LAHZEHAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 531,004 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لحظه حال” (@LAHZEHAL), 7,097 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LAHZEHAL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.