«Король Неверленда» Никки Сент Кроу 10/10 🌟 Эту книжку я перечитывала. Она совсем крошечная, но я проглотила её снова с тем же удовольствием. Да, это клише. И что? Здесь нет смысла искать что-то невероятное. К ней стоит приходить за лёгким чтением, атмосферой и вайбом. Первые двести страниц - мы ходим по кругу, смотрим на героев, которые выясняют отношения, искрят взглядами и... пару раз очень качественно предаютс…

Channel
Кусатель книг
@Kysatel_knig
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002663285710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kysatel_knig |
| Description | Здесь я буду делиться отзывами на покусаные книги и не только 🔥 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kysatel_knig |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 37 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.8%
- avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 100.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (30 April 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 112
- Videos
- 56
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
114 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 46.5% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 16.7% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 9.65% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 7.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Август - время догонять лето. Привет 🤡 Давно не виделись. Честно говоря, это лето выдалось не таким, как я планировала. Вместо продуктивных месяцев и горы прочитанных книг - две операции и борьба с депрессией, которая, признаюсь, до сих пор дает о себе знать. Было тяжело, и я позволила себе выпасть из жизни блога, чтобы просто побыть собой и восстановиться. И вот, я моргнула - и июнь превратился в август. Почти ни…
🔥3❤2🥰2
Дженифер Линн Барнс " Братья Хоторны" 8/10 🌟 Здесь сюжет ловко подкидывает новые повороты, и ты вместе с главными героями пытаешься собрать пазл из подсказок, фамильных секретов и хоторновского безумия. Атмосфера богатства, старинных особняков и вечной игры меня притягивает. Но при этом всю книгу меня не покидало ощущение, что она идёт очень ровно. Загадки интересные, да, напряжение держится, но вот чтобы сердце сж…
❤3👍1🔥1
И снова челлендж, на этот раз от @takoenazvaniekanala "Я, если бы была...." *букетом *песней *сериалом *книгой *месяцем *местом Это для меня было очень сложно. Я не понимаю, как можно выбрать какой-то один сериал/книгу/песню? Это как спросить: кого ты больше любишь больше - маму или папу? Но я очень постаралась,и вот, что у меня вышло
❤5👍1🔥1
У @pikachunexochy вышло интересное видео - Книжный челлендж по цветам Ну и я не смогла устоять от такого! Поэтому мы с No shelf control, SSK | Книги с листа и Открыт.Ка из Крыма сделали свою подборку книг! И теперь передаём книжную эстафету дальше: ✨ Когда–то была значимой. ✨ Чашка счастья: книги, кофе и материнство ✨ Алёна Tviti 🖤 ✨в объективе екатеринбурженки Ждём ваших книжечков, будем любоваться и пополня…
❤8🔥8🥰5
Уилки Коллинз "Женщина в белом" 10/10 🌟 Слог, идея, построение сюжета - мне понравилось всё. Это классная история, которая не ощущается тяжеловесной, хотя это приличный кирпич, а внутри него - многослойная интрига и загадка. Я растворилась в книге, а это то чувство, ради которого я и читаю. Если говорить честно, был момент, где я почти уснула. Когда юрист пустился в описание родственных связей и правил наследования…
❤8👍1🔥1
Как меня видит Pinterest! Приняла эстафету от @takoenazvaniekanala И передаю @Moriellka_blog и @no_shelf_control
❤6😁6🥰3
Подведение итогов МАРТА 2026 🤡 Немного статистики: ▪️12 книг ▪️4136 страниц ▪️10 дней без чтения ▪️На выходных читала больше всего ▪️Дни без чтения - середина недели (усталость, не успеваю) Топ-3 книг месяца: 🌟 "Рапунцель" Марисса Мейер 🌟 "7 мужей Эвелин Хьюго" Тейлор Дженкинс Рейд 🌟 "Книжный магазин воспоминаний" Сон Ючжон Выводы: • читать каждый день - хочу, но пока не получается • 12 книг - это отличный резул…
❤8👏3🥰2
Вы когда-нибудь пытались поймать идеальный момент для поста? Я, когда: всегда. Я думаю "ну вот щас я отфоткаю все, напишу посты, выложу", а потом хоп и на дворе ночь, спать пора... И переносится это все на завтра. Вот такой вот из меня недоблогер😁 Из новостей: На прошлой неделе у меня была небольшая операция. Ничего серьёзного, но первые дни было тяжко. Я целыми днями спала, не могла ни есть, ни пить. Просто выпал…
❤7👍2🥰2
Стряхиваю пыль с канала, что бы поделиться интересным! 🕸🌫🧽 Этим летом я вместе с LiveLib и Литрес запускаю кое-что очень классное! С 1 июня по 31 августа мы будем читать книги в рамках Летнего Книжного вызова — большой книжной активности для всех, кто хочет провести это лето вместе с хорошими историями. Вместе с амбассадорами Книжного вызова я собрала для вас книги, которые особенно хочется читать летом на любой вку…
👍6❤🔥4❤3🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
😁3❤1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Kysatel_knig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,107,352 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@no_shelf_control · 1582 postsМягкие заметки ☕️
@takoenazvaniekanala · 882 postsSSK | Книги с листа
@livlapissk · 2581 postЧашка счастья: книги, кофе и материнство
@mamalizaiegor · 9871 postС любовью, Мори
@Moriellka_blog · 3,6851 postОткрыт.Ка из Крыма
@otkrytkaizkryma · 1221 postКнижный mood 📖
@pikachunexochy · 2701 postАлёна Tviti 🖤
@tviti_books · 7,7001 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Kysatel_knig named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кусатель книг” (@Kysatel_knig), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kysatel_knig.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.