(btw eth gas like $7 so follow my Twitter if you haven’t Twitter.com/kylecalled)
👍6
Signed Kyle 🤺

Channel
@KyleCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
918subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778474971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KyleCalls |
| Description | Call channel. None of these are financial advice. Do your own research before investing. Join the discussion lounge https://t.me/+nSpTlo-Tpd1hMWI5 Contact @klowlry2 for paid promo/inquiries |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 13 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KyleCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 918 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 918 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
90 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 45.6% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2022 to 1 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(btw eth gas like $7 so follow my Twitter if you haven’t Twitter.com/kylecalled)
👍6
Signed Kyle 🤺
Hi 2023
👍12❤3
Signed Kyle 🤺
Ngl ngl bsc looking like a dead chain
🤯16😁6👍4❤3🎉3
Signed Kyle 🤺
New lounge too join up - t.me/FudRoom
👍2
Signed Kyle
KyleCalls pinned «I made a channel for eth calls for people who buy eth stuff. this one will be used for bsc https://t.me/icallrugs»
I made a channel for eth calls for people who buy eth stuff. this one will be used for bsc https://t.me/icallrugs
🤯5❤1
Signed Kyle
Apparently some like gigachad larp play rn real mcap is like 700k @VeryBanking https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xcefb8c93406b8c77771242d66ee9d5cec452cb71 https://twitter.com/nzdefi/status/1595623107644911616?s=46&t=B8RRr8nn_kUa4FoUBjlOtQ For ze info
👍1
Signed Kyle
I think this has like a 19% chance of reversing. Prob gotta hold this for a bit not a one hour 10x and dump. 140k https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xA7dE94227Eb6828497f4343B9923959E41Ae9CD1
🎉2🤯2🤩1
Signed Kyle
Gamble call really vitalik tweet, it burned so place your bets Tg- idk 80k mcap https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x1be175f524f3B7f24219b7c3a9b8006002ABb62C Edit: hit 250k decent gamble
👍1
Signed Kyle
File, posted without a caption
🎉2
Signed Kyle
Tweeted by inu https://t.me/BurnInuERC20 https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xD35130089B6c1612DBFC69F7A6a85D28bF8AF23A 38k Edit: x2 only hoooooly
👍6
Signed Kyle
Bought this. Memeable. Hopefully it sends https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xc21d3743c2b2b8d3a01c025becabeb1a4b8e232e @FLORKTOKENPORTAL 175k Edit: yeah gg
👍2
Signed Kyle
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KyleCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,324,179 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KyleCalls named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KyleCalls” (@KyleCalls), 918 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KyleCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.