Если вы устали “работать над собой”, но всё ещё не видите результата — добро пожаловать.
На канале раскладываю по полочкам, где застряла энергия и почему не приходят деньги, отношения или лёгкость.
@Oksanikys https://t.me/master_oksanikys
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 361–363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 06:33
362
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:33
362
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.53%
avg views ÷ 362 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.3
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
45.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
16 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
436
Reactions total
163
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
431
Videos
118
Links
243
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
163 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5328312053478202282
45
27.6%
custom 5420315771991497307
40
24.5%
custom 5438496463044752972
40
24.5%
custom 5429353942255410691
17
10.4%
💯
9
5.52%
🤩
9
5.52%
🙏
3
1.84%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
МУЖЧИНА
Если вы видите мужчину первым, это может означать, что у вас доминирует рациональное начало и склонность проявлять пассивную позицию в отношениях.
Такой человек может быть порой крайне сдержан и испытывать трудности в общении. Такому типу людей бывает трудно выражать свои эмоции открыто и быть честным, внутренние ограничения периодически порождают чувства одиночества и изоляции в отношениях.
Если вы увидели …
А что, если проблема вовсе не в кнопках?
После вчерашнего поста я поймала себя на одной мысли.
Мы можем сколько угодно учиться нажимать на правильные кнопки.
✔️ Не раздражаться.
✔️ Просить о помощи.
✔️ Благодарить мужа.
✔️ Находить время для себя.
✔️ Быть спокойной и ресурсной.
Но...
А что, если рука всё равно снова тянется к одной и той же кнопке?
🔴 Кнопке "Я сама"
🔴 Кнопке "Меня никто не понимает"
🔴 Кнопке "Ну…
От хаоса к гармонии. Где находится настоящий "пульт управления"?
Раньше мне казалось, что женственность — это про красивые платья, мягкий голос, уют в доме... Но чем больше я работаю с женщинами и наблюдаю за собой, тем сильнее понимаю: всё это лишь внешние проявления.
Настоящая женственность начинается совсем в другом месте.
Она начинается в тот момент, когда женщина понимает:
Я уже не ищу себя где-то вовне.
Я — ж…
Сегодня у меня день рождения 🥳 🎉
И знаете… с каждым годом я всё меньше переживаю из-за цифры в паспорте.
Наоборот.
Есть ощущение, что жизнь не заканчивается, а открывает новый уровень.
Сейчас я нравлюсь себе гораздо больше, чем в 25 или даже в 30 лет. Не потому, что стала идеальной. До идеала, как говорится, ещё далеко 😄
Просто сегодня я лучше знаю себя.
Я перестала пытаться всем угодить.
Перестала бояться начин…
Бывает, что жизнь словно решает проверить тебя сразу по всем фронтам.
Когда говорят: "Беда не приходит одна", раньше я внутренне сопротивлялась этой фразе. А сейчас понимаю: иногда действительно накрывает сразу несколько сфер жизни.
И в такие моменты самый бесполезный вопрос:
"За что?"
Гораздо важнее спросить себя:
"Для чего мне это сейчас?"
И как пройти этот путь так, чтобы не потерять себя?
Не провалиться в унын…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @KwantovRazbor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 599,709 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Квантовые Разборы|Подсознание” (@KwantovRazbor), 362 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KwantovRazbor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
