پاڵپشتی❤️☀️💚✌️
❤5

Channel
@KurmanjEncyclopedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004440107965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KurmanjEncyclopedia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KurmanjEncyclopedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 114 | +13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 101 | +39 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 62 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 62 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,052 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 71.1% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 16.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 9.65% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KurmanjEncyclopedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
پاڵپشتی❤️☀️💚✌️
❤5
https://t.me/Melody_Gerilla1
لطفاً از کانال خبری دوست کُرد ما از روژاوا حمایت کنید.🙏🏻❤️ Please support the news channel of our Kurdish friend from Rojava.🙏🏻❤️
❤🔥5❤1
https://t.me/MiddleEastNews02
❤🔥6
🔸️ شاه عباس اول و مسئله ایلات؛ ⁉️_ چرا قدرتهای محلی باید کنترل میشدند؟ برای فهم سیاست انتقال برخی طوایف کرد به خراسان، باید ابتدا شخصیت سیاسی شاه عباس اول و شیوه حکومتداری او را شناخت. رودی مَته در بررسی حکومت شاه عباس نشان میدهد که یکی از مهمترین پروژههای این پادشاه، تبدیل دولت صفوی از یک حکومت متکی بر اتحاد قبایل به حکومتی متمرکزتر بود. صفویه در آغاز قدرت خود، به نیروی قبایل قزلباش و ایلات وابسته بود. هم…
❤4💯1
🔸️ از قلعه دمدم تا خراسان؛ سیاست شاه عباس اول در برابر قدرت ایلات کرد در تاریخ صفویه، رابطه میان حکومت مرکزی و نیروهای ایلی همواره یکی از مهمترین مسائل سیاسی بود. دولت صفوی از قدرت نظامی قبایل برای حفظ و گسترش قلمرو خود استفاده میکرد، اما همین نیروهای ایلی در صورت برخورداری از استقلال سیاسی زیاد، میتوانستند به چالشی برای اقتدار شاه تبدیل شوند. بر اساس پژوهش ارائهشده در کتاب Kurdish Studies (Brill، ۲۰۲۵)، یکی از…
❤4💯1
🔸️ مروری بر مهاجرت اجباری کردها به خراسان در دورهٔ صفویه با روی کار آمدن دولت صفوی و سیاستهای مذهبی این سلسله، ساختار جامعهٔ ایران دستخوش تحولات مهمی شد. خراسان بهعنوان ایالتی دورافتاده از مرکز، همواره درگیر تهاجمات ازبکها بود؛ همین موضوع باعث شد صفویان توجه ویژهای به تقویت مرزهای شمالشرقی کشور نشان دهند. یکی از حساسترین رخدادهای تاریخی این دوره، کوچاندن ایلات کرد از غرب ایران به خراسان بود. بر پایهٔ روایت…
💯4❤2
🔸️ کوچ اکراد به خراسان؛ از سیاست مرزی تا مهندسی قدرت در عصر شاه عباس اول انتقال گروههایی از طوایف کرد به خراسان در دوره شاه عباس اول، یکی از نمونههای مهم سیاست جمعیتی و نظامی دولت صفوی است؛ رویدادی که اگر تنها با واژه «تبعید» توضیح داده شود، بخش مهمی از واقعیت تاریخی آن نادیده گرفته میشود. این اقدام در حقیقت بخشی از برنامه گسترده شاه عباس برای بازسازی رابطه میان حکومت مرکزی، ایلات و مناطق مرزی بود. رودی مَته، پژ…
❤4💯1
🔸️ کوچ اکراد به خراسان؛ راهبرد شاه عباس برای مدیریت یک امپراتوری در محاصره دولت صفوی در آغاز قرن یازدهم هجری با شرایطی بسیار پیچیده روبهرو بود. ایران صفوی نه با یک دشمن، بلکه با چند جبهه تهدید مواجه بود: عثمانیان در غرب، ازبکان در شرق و رقابتهای داخلی میان نیروهای ایلی که بخش مهمی از قدرت نظامی کشور را تشکیل میدادند. رودی مَته در تحلیل خود از سیاستهای شاه عباس اول نشان میدهد که یکی از مهمترین دغدغههای این…
❤4💯1
🔰 مقدمه انتقال گروههایی از طوایف کرد به خراسان در دوره شاه عباس اول، یکی از مهمترین سیاستهای جمعیتی، نظامی و مرزی دولت صفوی به شمار میرود. این رویداد در بسیاری از روایتها صرفاً به عنوان «کوچ اجباری» یا «تبعید» معرفی شده، در حالی که پژوهشهای جدید نشان میدهد باید آن را در چارچوب سیاستهای دولتسازی، تمرکز قدرت، مدیریت ایلات و دفاع از مرزهای شرقی ایران تحلیل کرد. این مجموعه با تکیه بر پژوهشهای رودی مته، منابع…
❤4💯1
🏔 چرا و چگونه کردها به خراسان تبعید شدند؟ یکی از فصلهای کمتر شناختهشدهٔ تاریخ ایران، کوچ اجباری هزاران خانوار کرد از غرب ایران و مناطق کردنشین عثمانی به خراسان در دورهٔ شاهعباس اول صفوی است؛ رخدادی که امروز میراثش را در شهرهایی مثل قوچان، بجنورد، شیروان و درگز میبینیم. 🔹 زمینهٔ ماجرا از اواخر دورهٔ شاهطهماسب و در سلطنت محمد خدابنده، دولت صفوی ضعیف شده بود. ازبکان در شرق پیوسته به خراسان میتاختند و آن را غارت …
❤7💯1
▪️کوچ اکراد به خراسان؛ تبعید یا راهبرد نظامی صفوی؟ 🔹یکی از مهمترین رویدادهای تاریخ کردهای خراسان، انتقال گروههایی از طوایف کرد به مرزهای شرقی ایران در دوران شاه عباس اول است. اسکندر بیگ منشی، مورخ دربار صفوی، در تاریخ عالمآرای عباسی این اقدام را در چارچوب سیاستهای شاه عباس برای تأمین امنیت خراسان روایت میکند. 🔹در اواخر سده دهم و اوایل سده یازدهم هجری، خراسان بارها هدف حملات ازبکان قرار گرفت. جنگهای پیدرپی، ن…
❤6💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KurmanjEncyclopedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kurmanj Encyclopedia” (@KurmanjEncyclopedia), 114 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KurmanjEncyclopedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.