Photo, posted without a caption
😁6

Channel
@KurdovDon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,244subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002348429193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KurdovDon |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 3 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KurdovDon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 1,244 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,261 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,266 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 1,266 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 47 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.02% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 6.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 4.92% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 15 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KurdovDon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 February 2025 to 15 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁6
Что тут можно сказать? Терпения и долгого, я не верю в быстрый прыжок, но по идее все что угодно может быть, в августе прошлого года обещали мост бтсТг, бтсТон как угодно его можно называть и по роадмапе он должен выйти в первом полугодие 25 года, может там и ту зе мун начнется #ton #мыслидеда
❤4😁1
тон +8% хрп +40% соль +30% Пища для размышлений
❤6🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤8
TON — блокчейн возможностей, которые вроде бы есть, а вроде бы и нет. Слежу за обстановкой: жду листинга Memhesh 28-го числа, наблюдаю за PAWS с его 100-миллиардным саплаем. Лично самые большие надежды возлагаю на PocketFi — если выйдут хотя бы по 2-3 цента, это уже будет праздник на блокчейне. Но чего-то явно не хватает. Возможно, какой-то игры, но не просто «тапалки», а чего-то с движем — чтобы можно было звать д…
🔥8👍1🫡1
https://t.me/SKLAD_ASTAHOVA_BOT/astahov?startapp=6044611455 Игра от Паши Астахова, делал ее он около полугода, потратил десятки тысяч зелёных, так что верю в него и в токен Астаховых. #ton #мыслидеда
👍3
Снг комьюнити дуреет с этой прикормки #ton #подарки #павелдуров
😁10
Если он выпустит ещё подарки сегодня, я стану его личным хейтером до конца жизни и никогда не прощу его
🤣7
Походу началось #ton #tonподарки #ПавелДуров
В день всех влюбленных, признаюсь в любви к своим любимым подписчикам! Не болейте, все будет у нас хорошо! 🥰📱🥰
❤4
Новые головоломки от хрокета, все знают хрокет, я считаю попытать удачу стоит, призовой 300 к хрокет это норм котлетка, рефка ниже https://t.me/xrocket/app?startapp=acci_zCpTgteLpgYwbKM
👍2❤1
Есть к чему стремиться, всем споки
😁5👍2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KurdovDon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“life change” (@KurdovDon), 1,244 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KurdovDon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.