Channel
@KulaAnnouncement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001641556358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KulaAnnouncement |
| Description | Kula is a decentralised impact investment firm. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KulaAnnouncement |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 239 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 239 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 967 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 86.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The clearest signal in any token structure is what the people at the top kept for themselves. Kula's founding team holds 4.146% of $KULA. The communities the projects serve hold more than four times that, which means nobody at Kula can outvote the regions it operates in. That is deliberate, and it is what makes the governance model more than a stated intention. Learn more about $KULA at kula.com https://x.com/ku…
$3,000 $USDT. 100 winners. $30 each. There's still time to get in on the $KULA summer kickoff quest. Buy more than $10 of $KULA on @MEXC, complete the entry requirements on @zealy_io, and hold for 30 days. That's the whole thing. No convoluted rules, no hoops. Summer's not over yet 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2077755013359624606
❤4
The six are independent and composable. Each can be adopted on its own, and they extend existing standards such as ERC-3643 and ERC-7943 rather than replacing them. All are released under CC0. Public domain from day one, because shared infrastructure only works if nobody owns it. If tokenisation is going to bring trillions of dollars of assets onchain, this is the layer that has to work first. If you're a develop…
Last week we announced that our team at Kula has proposed six Ethereum standards: ERC-8325 to ERC-8330, now in Review. Here is what each one does, and the gap it exists to close. 🧵👇 https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2084614200794493138?s=20
Community tokens are usually a line item in a marketing budget. At Kula they are a voting bloc, with ~17.9% of $KULA held by the regions the projects operate in, split across a 13% community allocation, a 4% airdrop and 0.852% reallocated. Governance sits where the impact lands, so the communities living with a project's consequences are the ones voting on how it is funded and run. Learn more about $KULA at kula.co…
Happy August RWA family ☀️ It's the last month of summer, but only the start of campaign season for Kula! And what better way to kick it off that a $KULA quest 👇 https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2084204286465003631?s=20
A reminder that yesterday we announced that Kula has proposed six new Ethereum standards aimed at bringing title tokenisation onchain. If you're a developer, enthusiast or otherwise interested in Ethereum development, all six standards are currently open for feedback. For more details, real the full release below 👇 https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2083180880848207966?s=20
Happy Friday $KULA family Don't forget, our Summer Kickoff Quest is still ongoing. Enter below for a chance to turn $10 into $40 by participating in our queast on @zealy_io Go go go! https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2077755013359624606
Today we announce that our team has proposed six Ethereum standards, ERC-8325 to ERC-8330, currently in Review. What are they? Between them they cover the interfaces nobody has standardised, from the link between a token and its underlying asset through to the legal documents behind it, transfer rules jurisdiction by jurisdiction, compliance events across an asset's life, impact data, and valuation reporting. Why …
Our latest quest is ending SOON Most crypto communities gather around a chart. This one gathers around hydropower in Nepal, water systems in Zambia and electric mobility in Kenya. Join the $KULA community TODAY to earn Zaps on @zealy_io. Go go go. https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2080605484013298122
Most tokens keep the majority of supply close to the market. Kula does the opposite. ~71% of $KULA is committed to the work itself: capitalising the RegionalDAOs that hold the hydropower in Nepal, the limestone in Zambia, the electric mobility rollout in Kenya. It releases at 10% a year, because that is the pace real assets get built at, not the pace a market wants. Supply pointed at the ground, not the chart. Le…
❤1
Only 2 days left to earn rewards by joining the $KULA community. ⏰ Head over to our quests on @zealy_io to earn $USDT or Zaps now! 💰 https://x.com/kula_dao/status/2081755740247650585?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KulaAnnouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 205,441 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KULA Announcement” (@KulaAnnouncement), 239 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KulaAnnouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.