Channel
@KskLIVEIX01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003314037653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KskLIVEIX01 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 2 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KskLIVEIX01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 14 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 14 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 38.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KskLIVEIX01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 24 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Αⲏⲕⲉⲧⲁ: ⲡⲣⲟⲥьⳝⲁ ⲡυⲥⲁⲧь ɥⲉⲥⲧⲏⲟ, υ ⲥ ⲩⲃⲁⲿⲉⲏυⲉ! 1. Иⲙя/ⲡⲥⲉⲃⲇⲟⲏυⲙ 2. Ϲⲕⲟⲗьⲕⲟ ⲗⲉⲧ 3.Быⲗ ⲗυ ⲩ ⲃⲁⲥ ⲟⲡыⲧ ⲃ ⲇⲣⲩⲅυⲭ ⲕⲥⲕ 4. Ϲⲃⲟⳝⲟⲇⲏⲟⲉ ⲃⲣⲉⲙя ⲟⲧ 0/10 5.ⳅⲏⲁⲉⲧⲉ ⲗυ ⲃы ⳝⲁⳅⲩ, υⲗυ ⲏⲉⲧ 6. Κⲁⲕⲟύ ⲩ ⲃⲁⲥ ɥⲁⲥⲟⲃⲟύ ⲡⲟяⲥ 7. Εⲥⲗυ ⲗυ ⲏⲁⲱⲁ ⲃⲉⲣⲥυя? 1.21.70.03 Βⲁⲿⲏⲟⲉ❗️ Αⲇⲙυⲏυⲥⲧⲣⲁⳡυя ⲃ ⲡⲣⲁⲃⲉ ⲟⲧⲕⲁⳅⲁⲧь ⲃⲁⲙ, ⳝⲉⳅ ⲡⲣυɥυⲏы. •Ϲⲡⲁⲥυⳝⲟ ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲡⲟⲗⲏⲉⲏυⲉ ⲁⲏⲕⲉⲧы🦢
Всем здравствуйте, кто хочет в кск голубая лагуна пишите на юз: w_nastu_w
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟐𝟑.𝟎𝟔.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ Ну чᴛᴏ ж ᴨᴩиɯᴧᴏ ʙᴩᴇʍя нᴏʙᴏᴦᴏ ᴨᴩᴀйᴄᴀ ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ ᴋᴄᴋ, нᴏ ужᴇ нᴇ ᴄᴏ ʍнᴏй и нᴇ ᴄ ᴛᴇʍи ᴩᴇбяᴛᴀ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ ᴄ нᴀʍи быᴧи. ʙᴇдь ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь нᴏʙый ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧᴇц, ᴋᴀᴩᴛᴀ, ᴏɸᴏᴩʍᴧᴇниᴇ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴏʙ, ᴀнᴋᴇᴛы, ɸᴏᴛᴏ, ᴀᴛʍᴏᴄɸᴇᴩᴀ. ᴏᴛ 1 ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧьцᴀ Ɜиɸиᴩᴋи Дᴧя ʍᴇня ϶ᴛᴏ быᴧ бᴏᴧьɯᴏй ᴏᴨыᴛ, инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄ, уʙᴧᴇчᴇния, нᴏ ʙᴄᴇʍу ᴇᴄᴛь ᴋᴏнᴇц и ʍᴏй инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄ ᴨᴩᴏᴨᴀᴧ ᴋᴀᴋ и ʍᴏᴛиʙᴀция, нᴏ ʙᴄᴇ жᴇ я ᴨᴩиᴏбᴩᴇᴧᴀ ᴄᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ʙᴏᴄᴨᴏʍинᴀний и ϶ʍᴏций чᴛᴏ дᴀжᴇ нᴇ дуʍᴀᴧᴀ ᴏ ɜᴀᴋᴩыᴛ…
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟏𝟒.𝟎𝟒.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ ᴩᴇбяᴛ я ᴨᴩᴏдᴀю ᴋᴄᴋ ᴨᴏ϶ᴛᴏʍу ᴋᴛᴏ хᴏчᴇᴛ ᴋуᴨиᴛь ᴨиɯиᴛᴇ ʍнᴇ ᴀнᴏн ᴛᴀʍ дᴏᴦᴏʙᴏᴩиʍᴄя ᴨᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ᴄдᴇᴧᴋи, нᴏ ᴨᴏᴨᴩᴏɯу ʙᴀᴄ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ᴋᴀᴋᴏᴇ нибудь ᴄᴧᴏʙᴏ чᴛᴏбы я ʙᴀᴄ ᴏᴛᴧичᴀᴧᴀ ᴋ ᴨᴩиʍᴇᴩу: ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛ, ᴨᴏᴋᴀ - ɸиᴧьʍ(ну ʙᴀɯᴇ ᴄᴧᴏʙᴏ ᴧюбᴏᴇ ʙᴀщᴇ) http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=39lh5cfp
Ребят возможно проект мы закроем, но все же дадим вам выбор(заморозка маловероятно что пройдёт скоро)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Нᴇ хᴏчу ᴨᴏᴋᴀɜᴀᴛьᴄя ᴛᴏᴋᴄичнᴏй, нᴏ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ᴧучɯᴇ щᴀᴄ ᴏᴛʙᴇчу чᴛᴏбы быᴧᴏ ʍᴇньɯᴇ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴏʙ и ᴋᴄᴛᴀᴛи ʙᴏɜʍᴏжнᴏ ᴋᴄᴋ нᴀ ʙᴩᴇʍя будᴇᴛ ᴏᴛᴄᴛᴩᴀнён.
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟑𝟏.𝟎𝟑.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ Дᴀʙнᴏ ʍы нᴇ ʙыᴨуᴄᴋᴀᴧи ᴨᴏᴄᴛы иɜ-ɜᴀ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ чᴛᴏ ʍᴏᴛиʙᴀция ᴨᴩᴏᴨᴀᴧᴀ и ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни нᴇᴛу и ʙ ʍᴏʍᴇнᴛᴇ я нᴀɯᴧᴀ ᴛᴋᴦ ᴄ ᴛᴩᴇɯ ᴋᴄᴋ и я ᴛᴀᴋ ᴨᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩᴇᴧᴀ щᴀᴄ ʍы ᴛᴀʍ нᴇ 1 ᴩᴀɜ быᴧи чᴛᴏ ᴋᴏнᴇчнᴏ я ᴨᴏниʍᴀю чᴛᴏ ᴀдʍины ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴀ нᴇ нᴇᴄуᴛ ᴏᴛʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙᴇннᴏᴄᴛь ɜᴀ ᴛᴏ чᴛᴏ чᴇй-ᴛᴏ ᴋᴄᴋ, ᴀᴋᴀдᴇʍии и ᴛд. ᴛᴀᴋ ʙᴏᴛ я ᴏᴛᴏɯᴧᴀ ᴏᴛ дᴇᴧᴀ ɜᴇйᴛʙ нᴀɯу ᴄᴛᴏᴩᴏну нᴇ ᴏбᴏᴄнᴏʙᴀнᴏ нᴏᴩʍᴀᴧьнᴏ, нᴏ ᴄ чᴇʍ ᴄᴏᴦᴧᴀɯуᴄь ϶ᴛᴏ ᴄ ᴋᴩыɯᴇй ʙ бᴏчᴋᴇ, нᴏ ᴛᴀʍ быᴧи ʍᴇᴩы ʙᴇдь нᴇᴋᴏᴛᴏ…
❤3
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Что с кск liveix я незнаю как это читается ну короч вы поняли о ком тема. Они давно не писали новые сообщения в свой телеграмм канал. Раньше они писали чаще я конечно промолчу про просмотры на пиар-посте они накрученые какие-то ведь всего у них 16 подписчиков ну не может такого быть что с 16 подписчиками у них такие просмотры. Также могу сказать раньше фото были лучше щас оно вооб…
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟏𝟖.𝟎𝟑.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня у нᴀᴄ быᴧᴀ ᴛᴩᴇниᴩᴏʙᴋᴀ ᴨᴏ ᴋᴏнᴋуᴩу. Нᴀ ᴛᴩᴇниᴩᴏʙᴋᴇ быᴧи ʍидын и Диᴀнᴀ. ʍы ᴨᴏдᴇᴧᴀᴧи ʙᴏᴧьᴛы ᴨᴏ ᴨᴩᴏхᴏдиᴧи жᴇᴩди и ᴨᴏᴨᴩыᴦᴀᴧи бᴀᴩъᴇᴩы.
❤2👏1
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟏𝟒.𝟎𝟑.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ У нᴀᴄ щᴀᴄ ᴄᴛᴩᴏиᴛᴄя ᴋᴧубнᴀя ᴋᴏнюɯня и ʙ ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴇʍ ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни нᴀчнёʍ нᴀʙᴇᴩнᴏᴇ ᴄᴛᴩᴏиᴛь и чᴀᴄᴛную, ᴀ ᴛᴀᴋжᴇ хᴏчу ᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь чᴛᴏ ʙы ʍᴏжᴇᴛᴇ ᴨᴇᴩᴇʙᴇᴄᴛи ʙᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ ᴋᴏня ᴋ нᴀʍ ʙᴇдь ʍы дуʍᴀᴇʍ ᴨᴩᴇдᴏᴄᴛᴀʙиᴛь ᴛᴀᴋую ʙᴏɜʍᴏжнᴏᴄᴛь.
❤2🔥1
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟏𝟑.𝟎𝟑.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ Хочу вам рассказать грустную новость. У нас пропал мир и в целом Майн просто стал как только скачанным и поэтому нам нужно перестраивать кск. Я надеюсь вы нас не покините, а останетесь с нами и будете следить за нашим развитием.
🤯2😭1
𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕🐾 ༻𝟏𝟐.𝟎𝟑.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔༺ Хᴏчу ᴨᴩᴇдуᴨᴩᴇдиᴛь чᴛᴏ щᴀᴄ ᴨᴇᴩʙый ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧᴇц ʙ ᴩᴇᴄᴛᴇ ᴨᴏдᴛᴏʍу ᴨᴏᴄᴛ будуᴛ ʙыхᴏдиᴛь ᴩᴇдᴋᴏ, ᴀ ᴛᴀдᴇ ʙ цᴇᴧᴏʍ щᴀᴄ ᴩᴇдᴋᴏ иᴦᴩᴀᴇʍ ᴨᴏᴛᴏʍу чᴛᴏ у ʙᴄᴇх учёбᴀ, нᴏ ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴏ ᴋᴀниᴋуᴧы и ʍы ʙᴄᴇ будᴇʍ ᴏᴛдыхᴀᴛь ᴛᴀᴋ чᴛᴏ ᴄ нᴀᴄᴛуᴨᴀющиʍ ʙᴀᴄ ᴛᴀᴋ ᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь.
👍2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KskLIVEIX01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребят возможно проект мы закроем, но все же дадим вам выбор(заморозка маловероятно что пройдёт скоро)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 24 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 659,329 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кск "Голубая Лагуна"” (@KskLIVEIX01), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KskLIVEIX01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.