Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КРИПТА | ЖЕЛЕЗНАЯ СТАВКА | БИЗНЕС

Channel

КРИПТА | ЖЕЛЕЗНАЯ СТАВКА | БИЗНЕС

@Kripta_Ironbet

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,865subscribers

-99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001504800723
TypeChannel
Username@Kripta_Ironbet
DescriptionКанал создан блогером/журналистом Андреем Алистаровым. Обсуждаем криптовалюту, учимся отличать фейковую крипту от настоящей и просто о бизнесе Помощник, оплата рекламы строго через @stivst YouTube канал: https://www.youtube.com/ironbet
Created19 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kripta_Ironbet

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Kripta_Ironbet/2068 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC@alistarov_andrew/9403 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@Kripta_Ironbet/2072 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC@alistarov_andrew/94217 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@alistarov_andrew/95019 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC@Kripta_Ironbet/2087 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@stop_scam/41593 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC@Kripta_Ironbet/2068 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@stop_scam/419417 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC@Kripta_Ironbet/2072 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@stop_scam/445125 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC@Kripta_Ironbet/2089 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@alistarov_andrew14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@alistarov_andrew (8–6)
@stop_scam9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@stop_scam (9–0)
@ironbetru9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (8–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 30 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 April 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @alistarov_andrew. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,86514,01113,9386 August 202613 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,843–14,033 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 03:0513,865-4
9 Nov 2026, 21:0413,869+1
8 Nov 2026, 10:0513,868-11
7 Nov 2026, 05:5713,879-3
6 Nov 2026, 03:1613,882-4
5 Nov 2026, 01:1713,886+1
4 Nov 2026, 03:5613,885+6
3 Nov 2026, 04:0713,879-6
2 Nov 2026, 06:0913,885-4
1 Nov 2026, 04:2913,889-9
31 Oct 2026, 05:4813,898-7
30 Oct 2026, 08:4613,905-3
29 Oct 2026, 07:4713,908-2
28 Oct 2026, 04:5113,910-7
27 Oct 2026, 05:2713,917-5
26 Oct 2026, 04:3713,922-13
25 Oct 2026, 05:3813,935-6
24 Oct 2026, 03:4713,941-1
23 Oct 2026, 01:2813,942-3
22 Oct 2026, 00:2713,945first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 13,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.781%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held46 (13 April 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total40,080
Reactions total313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
735
Videos
237
Links
422

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,641 reactions across 46 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁56234.2%
🔥47028.6%
👍32519.8%
❤1458.84%
👏513.11%
🤯301.83%
😢171.04%
🤩160.975%
😱130.792%
🤔90.548%
🥰20.122%
🎉10.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 46 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kripta_Ironbet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,710 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Алистаров дал большое интервью самому цитируемому изданию Татарстана — «Бизнес Онлайн» Читать: https://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/715287 Редакция БО: «Мы решили записать это интервью, чтобы ретроспективно, с позиции нынешнего объема фактов по делу Finiko оценить, в чем был ее феномен, как и почему в деле появились высокопоставленные фигуранты и как их появление вообще изменило картину. Во время разговора мы так…

👍11🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,750 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @alistarov_andrewPhoto

Таксист РАЗВЕЛ нас в Корее и попал в РАЗОБЛАЧЕНИЕ https://youtu.be/UMD7bul_RnQ Как нас удивили таксисты в Сеуле, разводняк на ровном месте. В этом выпуске гуляем по Южной Корее, рядом с Сеулом (Бучхон, Пучхон) из-за прохождения чекапа организма пришлось остановиться в дешевом отеле, за 4000 руб. Далее переезд в Pulman, шоппинг и странный но качественный чекап (колоноскопия и гастроскопия). Собирались снять обычный …

🔥21👍5❤3

2 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,730 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Нашёл СКАМ-ЦЕНТР в Камбодже:Кто управляет пирамидой С8 https://youtu.be/SyxKNOnHWRI Основатель финансовой пирамиды "С8", некий Нейтон Джонс, дает сигналы по торговле криптовалютой российским вкладчикам. Но есть нюанс: крипта выдуманная, биржа LumenX тоже и даже основатель оказался обычным студентом таджиком, по имени Фахим Гадомамадов, который попал в рабство закрытого китайского скам-центра на границе между Камбод…

👍15🔥9❤4

30 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,980 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Вот фейк который даже меня по ошибке добавил))

😁27🤯3❤1

30 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈3,670 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍10🤔4🔥2

26 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈3,360 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥5🤔2❤1

26 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈4,050 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Стрим у моего друга на канале про создание агента iA чтобы вы смогли проводить небольшие расследования, мы тут: https://www.youtube.com/live/9JYk71PJ0SQ?si=0s1JHFpVMB4kXPvY

🔥13

25 Oct 2026, 20:08 UTC≈3,870 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Подсунуть подделку и забрать 8 000 000 рублей. Именно так пытались развести моих друзей из «Швейцарской Лавки», которые занимаются продажей и скупкой оригинальных часов и украшений. Им предложили редкие Audemars Piguet — модель, выпущенную тиражом всего 200 экземпляров. Только вот часы оказались качественной подделкой. Ребята профессионалы: подвох распознали, сделка не состоялась. В этой сфере есть удобная для мош…

😁11❤3🤔1

25 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC≈2,840 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Времени объяснять нет, обновите iOS, начали воровать крипту на уязвимости старой прошивки. Еще не начало набирать массовость, сообщаю вам на самой ранней стадии. Пропишись @stop_scam

👍11👏2🔥2😁2

25 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTC≈3,280 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @alistarov_andrewPhoto

Новый vlog: МАША ВЫИГРАЛА ДЖЕКПОТ В МАКАО. Смотреть: https://youtu.be/hLUoHV9poTQ Наше путешествие по Китаю привело нас в Макао. «Лас-Вегас востока» именно так его называют в народе. Обзор потрясающего отеля Conrad. Прогулки, шоппинг и самое удивительное, что могло произойти, это самый крупный выигрыш Марии за все время, со времен игр в Сочи. Мы шли проигрывать, просто чтобы растянуть удовольствие, но произошло то,…

🔥17👏4👍2❤1

19 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC≈3,770 views41 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

КАК СУХОПЛЮЕВ КИНУЛ ГАФАРОВА https://youtu.be/CyE-2s3bHB4 Сухоплюев кинул Гафарова. Интервью человека в маске, с который перед побегом взаимодействовал Вова. Разбираем крипто кошельки Thunderbolt Union. И узнаем подробности мошенничества на матче Кайрат - Реал Мадрид. 7 июня 2026 года Эрик Гафаров написал, что они ищут Вову Сухоплюева с семи утра. А что было до этого? Андрей Алистаров нашел кассу пирамиды Thunderb…

🔥29👍6❤5🤔1

16 Oct 2026, 15:02 UTC≈5,070 views73 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Нива сделала ответ Тесле

😁55👏7🔥4🤯3🤩2❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @Kripta_Ironbet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Kripta_Ironbet as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTCAnonymous Poll667 voters

Кто на каких биржах торгует?

  1. Binance21%
  2. Bybit57%
  3. MexC12%
  4. BingX17%
  5. Bitget19%
  6. OKX21%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алистаров | Расследования
@stop_scam · 57,268
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?!
@BogdanGdeX · 25,427
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Crypto Family Public
@CryptoFamilyPublic · 28,893
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 121,620
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
САТОШИ NEWS
@satoshinews · 29,435
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
GENESIS
@trend_gen · 54,665
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 84,558
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Биржевой Монарх
@BMonarch_official · 42,878
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КРИПТА | ЖЕЛЕЗНАЯ СТАВКА | БИЗНЕС” (@Kripta_Ironbet), 13,865 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kripta_Ironbet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.