WATCH - 2000 Mules movie (Full HD) Request private channel access to view https://t.me/+zDmBHmPKYa40YTY5
Signed Patriot Networks Bot

Channel
@KrakenKrew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
584subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001251044249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KrakenKrew |
| Description | Sharing the truth! Shoving one Red Pill at a time down your throat! bit.ly/PatriotMap |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KrakenKrew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 584 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 584 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
WATCH - 2000 Mules movie (Full HD) Request private channel access to view https://t.me/+zDmBHmPKYa40YTY5
Signed Patriot Networks Bot
Got me all teary eyed 😢
Signed Kori Clayton
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CZzB87gFglB/?utm_medium=share_sheet
Signed Kori Clayton
Listen to what Nurse Nicole Sirotek has to say… REMDESIVIR IS KILLING PEOPLE IN HOSPITALS, NOT COVID. “If you ask me, this isn’t a hospital it’s a concentration camp!” 🔥🔥🔥
Signed Kori Clayton
Period!
Signed Kori Clayton
Pharmacist in turlock ca at Safeway put on notice. Understand this is for the schools and children as well. #madashellmomma #standuppeople This is venessa. Take these muther fuckers out now!
Signed Kori Clayton
https://youtu.be/hm0QA5myK-Q
Signed Kori Clayton
Is this why the Supreme Court ruled the way they did with FED FUNDED healthcare??? Folks... I think you are witnessing the death of the old Healthcare System and the BIRTH of a new one! What do you think?
Signed Kori Clayton
According to James O'Keefe's documents, COVID was originally a spike protein vaccine for bats that Fauci attached to the original SARS virus which caused it to become aerosolized and super contagious. Fauci worked closely with China to create this chimera. — ronaldwatkins.com
Signed Kori Clayton
The COVID vaccines are ineffective because they are just replicating the original "virus" that Fauci created. A replication of a synthetic chimeric vaccine attached to the original sars. There is no difference between COVID and the vaccinations. Catching COVID naturally is safer than receiving the vaccine, because the vaccine is injected directly into your veins whereas aerosolized COVID can be blocked by your nos…
Signed Kori Clayton
DARPA understands and reiterates that Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and interferon are all effective against SARS. — ronaldwatkins.com
Signed Kori Clayton
Here we learn that SARS-CoV-2 is not even a virus - it is a chimera. SARS-CoV-2 is a spike protein vaccine that was engineered to be attached to the original SARS virus. SARS-CoV-2 is a contagious bat vaccine that spreads via aerosol. — ronaldwatkins.com
Signed Kori Clayton
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KrakenKrew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@KrakenKrew named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KrakenKrew” (@KrakenKrew), 584 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KrakenKrew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.