Channel
@Kou_star
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
219subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002070038576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kou_star |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kou_star |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 219 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 220 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 221 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 221 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
143 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5206502842478638898 | 42 | 29.4% | |
| custom 5303359891216289332 | 24 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5449800250032143374 | 23 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5461175092958483314 | 20 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5192879906295397710 | 16 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5469744063815102906 | 14 | 9.79% | |
| custom 5224257782013769471 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5303414815258071633 | 2 | 1.40% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 14 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Результаты конкурса: Победители: 1. 𓆩𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𓆪 (@Roma_Province) 2. Александр (@AlexanderBizz) Проверить результаты
custom 54611750929584833143custom 52242577820137694712
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
так, заканчиваем скорее и делаю новый!
custom 51928799062953977103
Signed Kᅠ
😃🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤😃 🥳ИТОГИ НА 70 ТАПОВ 😏УСЛОВИЯ @cheesecake_snowball НА ОТПИСКУ 15 МИНУТ- @Deerfik
custom 520650284247863889811custom 53033598912162893325custom 54611750929584833144custom 54498002500321433742
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Kᅠ
Результаты конкурса: Победители: 1. jam1rka (@BRJAMIRA9) 2. 𝔏𝔦𝔠𝔳𝔦? бᴀн ᴧᴄ (@Licvi_Official) Проверить результаты
custom 54611750929584833145
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
⭐️
custom 53033598912162893325custom 54498002500321433742custom 52065028424786388981custom 54697440638151029061
Signed Kᅠ
🔥конкурс на 65 звёзд
Signed Kᅠ
держите пока такой, а то я сейчас занята не могу делать еще что то
Signed Kᅠ
⚡️НЕБОЛЬШОЙ КОНКУРС⚡️ 1️⃣ место: Букетик💐 2️⃣место: Мишка🧸 условия: переслать 1 др/ТГК быть подписанным итоги в 19.00 по МСК,удачи!🌌
custom 54498002500321433747custom 53033598912162893322custom 52065028424786388981
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
ещё хотим? реакций👇
custom 520650284247863889827custom 546974406381510290610custom 54498002500321433745custom 53033598912162893323custom 53034148152580716332custom 54611750929584833142
Signed Kᅠ
отписать 15 минут -> @Deerfik
Signed Kᅠ
Результаты конкурса: Победители: 1. 𝚂𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝙳✨𝚣𝚒𝚡 (@DozixFromUniverse) 2. 🪬🛡️Юра (@SamuraiUrakryt) 3. Sergei (@YOBYDI) Проверить результаты
custom 53033598912162893323custom 54611750929584833142
Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Kou_star. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,444,390 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Kou_star named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“﹫𝙆𝙤𝙪.𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴🏙” (@Kou_star), 219 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kou_star.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.