Channel
@Kotyabeads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
238subscribers
+83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003700967304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kotyabeads |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kotyabeads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 238 | +83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 155 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 155 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,273 |
| Reactions total | 232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
232 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 43.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5332598551098727093 | 31 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5425043208134466508 | 12 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5235624876819098821 | 11 | 4.74% | |
| custom 5260425203397209331 | 9 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5366464681760286402 | 9 | 3.88% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 3.02% | |
| custom 5816733350672473720 | 4 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5235887681572971694 | 2 | 0.862% | |
| custom 5354820780607680286 | 2 | 0.862% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kotyabeads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем приветик 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Еще одна милота,на тест от ариашки🐨 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Сплела за пол дня,плетение было легкий,судьбу схемы не знаю ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Всем спасибо за внимание,у меня есть еще одна фигурка,давайте 35 реакций и пост😘
❤🔥3❤1
Signed 𝐿𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑘
на 15рк пост 😘
❤16custom 53325985510987270937custom 53664646817602864025custom 52604252033972093312❤🔥1
Signed чушка
Всем приветики 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Да это еще одна зайка,которую я плела еще в июле,но какая все таки милашка у меня вышла🎀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сплела за 2 дня,очень быстро,и наконец-то у меня вышли нормальные шарики 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Схема платная,но канал я потеряла 🤭 На этом все,у меня есть еще она готовая фигурка,пост с ней на 50 реакций 🙈
❤🔥9❤4
Signed 𝐿𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑘
🖤
❤15❤🔥6custom 54250432081344665084custom 53325985510987270931
Signed чушка
Ай бабуся балует звездочкой, спасибо 🫶🏻 Ой епта, и не только бабуся Спасибо любимки @Nk_biser @w_kirpich @youremydawn @wilpkism
❤10❤🔥5
Signed ࣪˖ ˙₊κστя⸼⊹࣭ ·
Здрахуйте Не ждали? А я тут как тут с парным постом ⭐Мой котей был парный с любимой Васей 🖤 ⭐Канальчик Васи ⭐Все оформляем подписочку Оценивайте наших котеев, и давайте много реакций, скоро еще один парный пост и пост с авторкой🫶🏻
❤13❤🔥6💘3custom 53325985510987270932custom 53548207806076802862custom 52356248768190988211custom 52604252033972093311custom 58167333506724737201
Signed ࣪˖ ˙₊κστя⸼⊹࣭ ·
Всем ку-ку 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Такая милашка у меня вышла,плела по платной схеме от любимой паприки🎀 ⏪⏩⏪⏩⏪⏩⏪⏩⏪⏩ Сплела за 2 дня,очень довольна результатом 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Схема платная ее можно купить на канале паприки🎀 На этом все,оцениваем милашку,и на 50 реакций новый пост!!🩷
❤🔥3❤2custom 53325985510987270932
Signed 𝐿𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑘
давайте многа реакций и я сплету биг версию в таком же окрасе !! от чушки
❤11❤🔥4💘4
Signed чушка
нА 15рк пост утром 🖤 upd : Я УЖЕ СФОТАЛА ТАМ ВСЁ ОЧЕНЬ КРУТА от чушки
custom 53325985510987270939custom 54250432081344665087custom 53664646817602864024❤1❤🔥1custom 52604252033972093311
Signed чушка
Чей мишка?🩷
❤10❤🔥3
Signed 𝐿𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑘
Ребят, вы прикиньте, у нее еще крылышки будут.. Это будет либо пиздец, либо очень ахуенно
custom 53325985510987270939custom 52356248768190988212custom 58167333506724737202❤🔥1
Signed ࣪˖ ˙₊κστя⸼⊹࣭ ·
Лапость Ну и короче днем переделаю переднюю, щас я слишком сильно хочу спать
❤6custom 52604252033972093313❤🔥1custom 52356248768190988211custom 52358876815729716941custom 53325985510987270931custom 58167333506724737201
Signed ࣪˖ ˙₊κστя⸼⊹࣭ ·
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Kotyabeads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 637,617 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Котя˖˚⋅₊” (@Kotyabeads), 238 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kotyabeads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.