Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI Kosina

Channel

AI Kosina

@KosinAi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956754526
TypeChannel
Username@KosinAi
DescriptionСгенерированные рисунки, с первого дня самостоятельной учебы
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/KosinAi

Growth

326 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:1632no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:4732first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
433
Videos
42
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2648.1%
🔥1833.3%
custom 5458707294944500893611.1%
custom 545891963812761539123.70%
👏23.70%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC19 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @novafictionPhoto

Красота! 🌟 ЧГ || WB || Ozon #из_печати

🔥41

17 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC20 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @subway_angels

Всем привет! Я с новостями 😽 Книга готова! Ее можно заказать и почитать в бумажной версии. 🪻В чем особенности нового издания «Шаман и звезды»: текст расширили и обновили, добавили больше лора и новых глав. Бонусом — главы из продолжения. Спасибо моим дорогим редакторам — Таше Гориновой, Наталье Farit_book и Марии Головей! 🪻Пожалуйста, поддержите выход книги: можно поставить звездочки на площадках, написать отзыв

17 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Очень горжусь и уже заказала себе

custom 54587072949445008932🔥1

14 Apr 2026, 14:37 UTC74 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneginaoneginaVideo

как вы помните, у меня есть совместная песня с мировой звездой и нобелевским лауреатом Владимиром Набоковым. называется «приглашение на казнь». вышла в марте а уже в эту пятницу выйдет новый трек, и он тоже будет весьма интересный. на этот раз — полностью моего авторства как думаете, о чем он будет? видео сделала Оля Косина

🔥4

28 Mar 2026, 10:12 UTC82 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Не смогла в этот день пройти мимо своих детских фотографий

8custom 54587072949445008934

20 Mar 2026, 12:09 UTC90 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥3👏2custom 54589196381276153912

20 Mar 2026, 07:54 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Спойлер к следующему сниппет. Создаётся впечатление, что я не делаю ничего, кроме сниппетов 🫣

2

20 Mar 2026, 07:54 UTC67 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneginaoneginaPhoto

«фит Евгении Онегиной и Владимира Набокова», — звучит гордо, особенно на волнах федеральной радиостанции. «приглашение на казнь» прозвучало на НАШЕм радио в программе «фАнотека». если кому-то интересна программа — послушать можно тут, про меня с 26:40. забавно, что, слушая программу и упав в ностальгию по подростковой любви к этой радиостанции, я вспомнила интересный факт. сама идея положить музыку на прозу и что

4

19 Mar 2026, 12:24 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

На самом деле у этого видео было вступление, но мне поздно сказали, что сниппет должен обязательно начинаться со слов, и вступление вырезали. Но я хочу, чтобы вы увидели его полностью, даже не смотря на то, что не хватает только пары секунд.

5

18 Mar 2026, 18:33 UTC57 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @oneginaoneginaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @KosinAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 938,656 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI Kosina” (@KosinAi), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KosinAi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.