Channel
@KonjunktionTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
692subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001313709048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KonjunktionTelegram |
| Created | 28 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KonjunktionTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 692 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 696 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 696 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,801 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
59 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 25 | 42.4% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 35.6% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 3.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Es ist nichts anderes als die Spielverlängerung des Schuldgeldsystems über neue Kanäle. Dass sich parallel dazu zahlreiche "Politiker aller Herren Länder" sowie andere "Gutmenschen" selbstredend die Taschen vollmachen, muss wohl nicht extra erwähnt werden. Wo stand die Ukraine nochmals vor dem Jahr 2022 im Korruptionsindex? Irgendwo auf Platz 125? ⬇️⬇️
💥💸 200 Milliarden Dollar. Der Chef der ukrainischen Nationalbank, Andrij Pyschnyj, gibt bekannt, dass die Ukraine seit 2022 fast 200 Milliarden US-Dollar direkte Budgethilfe von westlichen Partnern erhalten hat. Zur Einordnung: 💰 Das entspricht durchschnittlich rund 550 Millionen Dollar – jeden einzelnen Tag seit Kriegsbeginn. 💰 Oder mehr als 22 Millionen Dollar pro Stunde. Dabei handelt es sich nicht um Kredite…
🤮3
Auch wenn es viele vielleicht (?) nicht mehr hören/lesen können, befasst sich der morgige Artikel mit Anthony Fauci und seinen "Nichtaussagen" vor dem US-Senatsausschusses für Innere Sicherheit. Aus dem morgigen Beitrag ein kleiner Ausschnitt: Fauci berief sich über 100 Mal auf sein Aussageverweigerungsrecht. Das ist kein Zeichen von Vertrauen in seine eigene Unschuld. Es ist ein Zeichen von Angst. Er weiß, dass e…
💯2
5%-Hürde - https://damussmanerstmalumzweieckendenken.de
Konjunktion - konjunktion.info pinned a photo
Neuer Lesestoff - Systemfrage: "Unsere Demokratie" als privates Monopoly-System Es ist an der Zeit, jegliche Vorstellung darüber ad acta zu legen, dass das, was man die „USA“, „Deutschland“ oder die „EU“ nennt, eine Art von freien und demokratischen Länder bzw. Institution zu bezeichnen. Das sind sie keineswegs, sondern alle werden vollständig von der „privaten“ Federal Reserve Bank, respektive der EZB, von national…
💯4
Anbei noch das im heutigen Artikel mit behandelte Dokument der US-Regierung unter dem "Retter" Trump.
Konjunktion - konjunktion.info pinned a photo
Neuer Lesestoff - Digitalisierung und Tokenisierung: Die "Große Aneignung" aller privaten Vermögenswerte Die Tokenisierung ist ein Thema, über das ich seit Jahren immer wieder geschrieben habe, doch die Beschleunigung dieses skandalösen massiven staatlichen Diebstahls schreitet nun blitzschnell voran und wird von den Machthabern hinter den Kulissen offen zugegeben. Eine der Spinnen im Netz, Larry Fink, Vorstandsvors…
🤬3💯1
. 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪 1949 lag der Rhein so trocken, dass Schiffe auf dem Steinbett saßen – und niemand rief die Klimakatastrophe aus. Ein Reminder aus dem Bundesarchiv! Kann man den Dürre-Gläubigen NPC'S mal vorzeigen! Ein Film aus dem Bundesarchiv zeigt den Sommer 1949: breite Sand- und Steinbänke, Schiffe auf Grund, Fährenrampen wie Steilwände, Pegel, die für so niedrige Stände nicht ausgelegt waren. Der Tiefstand unterbot …
🤡1
Konjunktion - konjunktion.info pinned a photo
Neuer Lesestoff - NDAA 2027: Der geplante Zusammenschluss des US- und israelischen Militärs hat die erste Hürde genommen Ich hatte Anfang Juni über den geplanten Zusammenschluss des US- und israelischen Militärs mittels des NDAA 2027-Gesetzes berichtet. Nun ist das Ja des US-Repräsentantenhaus für die Genehmigung dieses Gesetzes bzgl. der Verteidigungsausgaben für 2026 (National Defense Authorization Act) unterzeich…
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KonjunktionTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 642,824 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Konjunktion - konjunktion.info” (@KonjunktionTelegram), 692 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KonjunktionTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.